[Current aspects of stone therapy]. / Aktuelle Aspekte der Steintherapie.

More than 30 % of all admissions to an urologic clinic are for the treatment of urinary stones. In almost all cases, the treatment is minimally invasive employing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Technical advances in endourology and a growing expertise in ESWL led to a decline in ESWL and an increase in endoscopic techniques. In comparison with ESWL, the endoscopic techniques are more invasive but in most cases achieve a stone free state faster. With the introduction of diagnosis related groups (DRG), the economic aspect of stone therapy is gaining in importance. Stone prevention leads to a cost reduction in the health care system, justifying the use of an appropriate stone metaphylaxis. This review article presents the current recommendations for interventional urinary stone therapy and lists the options of conducting both medical and economically rational therapy.

[Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in comparison with conventional nephrectomy]. / Transperitoneale und retroperitoneale laparoskopische Nephrektomie im Vergleich zur konventionellen Nephrektomie.

We report on our clinical experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy in 35 patients. We have performed a total of 18 transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies (TLN) for benign renal disease. After the introduction of a hydraulic dissecting device, we have since performed 17 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies (RLN). These data were compared with those in 19 consecutive open nephrectomies (N). All groups were comparable in terms of indication. The mean operative time for benign disease was 206.5 min for TLN, 211.2 min for RLN and 117 min for N. Analgesic medication requirement per patient was 2 days for TLN, 1 day for RLN and 4 days for N, while the postoperative hospital stay averaged 7 days for TLN, 6 days for RLN and 10 days for N. Our results demonstrate the advantage of a laparoscopic approach over open surgery and also reveal the distinct benefit of a retroperitoneal approach. However, due to the small number of indications this procedure should be restricted to a few urologic centers.

Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach.

OBJECTIVES: Different techniques have been introduced to perform laparoscopic nephrectomy using either the transperitoneal or the retroperitoneal route. However, to date only few data exist comparing the results and morbidity of these procedures as well as with the standard technique of open nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This paper compares the clinical results of 18 transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies (TLN) for benign renal disease with 17 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies (RLN) and 19 consecutive open nephrectomies (Nx). All groups were comparable in terms of indication. The analysis of clinical data included operative time, morbidity, length of analgesic use and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean operative time for benign disease was 206.5 for TLN, 211.2 for RLN and 117 min for open nephrectomy. Analgesic medication requirement per patient was 2 days for TLN, 1 day for RLN and 4 days for Nx while the postoperative hospital stay averaged 7 days for TLN, 6 days for RLN and 10 days for Nx. The time of convalescence was 21 days after RLN, 24 days after TLN versus 40 days after open nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate an overall clear advantage of a laparoscopic approach when compared to open surgery and also reveals distinct benefits of a retroperitoneal approach.