Economic Impact of European Liver and Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA) Recommendations for Hepatitis B Prophylaxis After Liver Transplantation.

The European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, ELITA, promoted a Consensus Conference involving 20 experts across the world which generated updated guidelines on HBV prophylaxis in liver transplant candidates and recipients. This study explores the economic impact associated with the implementation of the new ELITA guidelines. To this aim, a condition-specific cohort simulation model has been developed to compare new and historical prophylaxis, including only pharmaceutical cost and using the European perspective. The target population simulated in the model included both prevalent and incident cases, and consisted of 6,133 patients after the first year, that increased to 7,442 and 8,743 patents after 5 and 10 years from its implementation. The ELITA protocols allowed a cost saving of around € 235.65 million after 5 years and € 540.73 million after 10 years; which was mainly due to early HIBG withdrawal either after the first 4 weeks or after the first year post Liver Transplantation (LT) depending on the virological risk at transplantation. Results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses. The money saved by the implementation of the ELITA guidelines would allow healthcare decision makers and budget holders to understand where costs could be reduced and resources re-allocated to different needs.

2020 position statement and recommendations of the European Liver and Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA): management of hepatitis B virus-related infection before and after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis of HBV recurrence is critical after liver transplantation in HBV patients. Despite new prophylactic schemes, most European LT centres persist on a conservative approach combining hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ides analogues (NA). AIM: This setting prompted the European Liver Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA) to look for a consensus on the prevention of HBV recurrence. METHODS: Based on a 4-round Delphi process, ELITA investigated 16 research questions and established 50 recommendations. RESULTS: Prophylaxis should be driven according to 3 simplified risk groups: Low and high virological risk patients, with undetectable and detectable HBV DNA pre-LT, respectively, and special populations (HDV, HCC, poorly adherent patients). In low-risk patients, short-term (4 weeks) combination of third-generation NA+ HBIG, or third generation NA monotherapy can be considered as prophylactic options. In high-risk patients, HBIG can be discontinued once HBV DNA undetectable. Combined therapy for 1 year is advised. HBV-HCC patients should be treated according to their virological risk. In HDV/HBV patients, indefinite dual prophylaxis remains the gold standard. Full withdrawal of HBV prophylaxis following or not HBV vaccination should only be attempted in the setting of clinical trials. Organs from HBsAg+ve donors may be considered after assessment of risks, benefits, and patient consent. They should not be used if HDV is present. In poorly adherent patients, dual long-term prophylaxis is recommended. Budget impact analysis should be taken into account to drive prophylactic regimen. CONCLUSIONS: These ELITA recommendations should stimulate a more rational and homogeneous approach to HBV prophylaxis across LT programs.

One-year vaccination against hepatitis B virus with a MPL-vaccine in liver transplant patients for HBV-related cirrhosis.

Conflicting results have been reported on vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a prophylaxis against viral recurrence after liver transplantation. We investigated the efficacy of 1-year, monthly vaccination using an adjuvant 3-deacylated monophosphoryl-lipid-A (MPL) recombinant S vaccine initially administered together with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) in 18 patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis. All received 12 vaccine doses (HBsAg, 20 mcg plus MPL, 50 mcg): the initial six doses (phase I) were administered within 7days after intravenous HBIg (2000IU), while the last 6 (phase II) following HBIg withdrawal. All patients received lamivudine during the study. Anti-HBs titers were determined before each dose and then for 1year after vaccination. After phase I anti-HBs titers were greater than 100IU/l in all patients and in three (16.6%) were greater than 500IU/l. After phase II 10 patients (55.5%) achieved anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l and five (27.7%) greater than 500IU/l. One year after vaccination eight patients (44.4%) maintained anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l, with a median titer of 234IU/l (102-1205), and 2 (11.1%) greater than 500IU/l. One-year extended monthly vaccination with a MPL-adjuvant recombinant vaccine induces a sustained protective anti-HBs response in approximately half of transplant recipients.

Low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin given "on demand" in combination with lamivudine: a highly cost-effective approach to prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus infection in the long-term follow-up after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cost of long-term prophylaxis with high-dose human hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) after liver transplantation is extremely high. The aim of the present study was to assess consumption rates of high (5,000 IU) and low (2,000 IU) doses of HBIg given intravenously "on demand", and determine their cost-effectiveness compared with conventional fixed monthly schedules. METHODS: The study included 11 male patients (mean age 53 years) who received transplants for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis 29 to 96 months earlier, all receiving lamivudine (100 mg/day) prophylaxis. Each patient received three consecutive intravenous infusions of 5,000 IU HBIg, followed by three 2,000 IU infusions. HBIg consumption was assessed by serial measurement of serum hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer at 2-week intervals. HBIg was readministered only when HBsAb titers dropped below 70 IU/L (i.e., "on demand"). RESULTS: Mean HBsAb peak titers after high and low HBIg doses were 1,641 +/- 385 and 848 +/- 216 IU/L, respectively (P <0.0001). Mean time to reach an HBsAb titer less than 70 IU/L was 79.5 +/- 38.2 days versus 61.6 +/- 32.1 days, respectively (P =NS). Interindividual variation coefficients were 23 +/- 18% and 32 +/- 26% (5,000 IU and 2,000 IU, respectively). Using the on demand approach, maintenance of a protective anti-HBs titer required an average number of 4.0 (5,000 IU) and 5.6 (2,000 IU) HBIg administrations per year, respectively (P =NS). CONCLUSIONS: Individual HBIg consumption profiles are highly variable. A low-dose (2,000 IU) on demand HBIg administration schedule is highly cost-effective and provides more than 50% savings compared with conventional high-dose monthly schedules.

Percutaneous laser ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous laser ablation for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 9 male cirrhotic patients (mean age 50 years, range 45-60 years) with 12 biopsy proven nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma (mean diameter 2.0 cm, range 1.0-3.0 cm) treated by laser ablation before liver transplantation between June 2000 and January 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Laser ablation was carried out by inserting 300 nm optical fibers through 21-Gauge needles (from two to four) positioned under ultrasound guidance into the target lesions. A continuous wave Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminium Garnet laser was used. Transarterial chemoembolization prior to liver transplantation was performed in two incompletely ablated tumors. RESULTS: No procedure-related major complications were recorded. During the waiting time to liver transplantation local tumor progression after ablation occurred in 3 nodules (25%). At histological examination of the explanted livers complete necrosis was found in 8 nodules (66.7%, all treated exclusively with laser ablation), partial necrosis >50% in 3 nodules (25%), and partial necrosis <50% in 1 nodule. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhotic livers awaiting liver transplantation, percutaneous laser ablation is safe and effective for the management of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Massive hepatic angiomyolipoma in a young woman with tuberous sclerosis complex: significant clinical improvement during tamoxifen treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Isolated liver angiomyolipomas (AMLs) occur in about 40% of TSC patients. Because of their slow growth, these tumors are often asymptomatic. Since AMLs express estrogen and progesteron receptors we suggest the possible benefits of tamoxifen for the treatment of liver AMLs. METHODS: We report the case of a 26-year-old female affected by tuberous sclerosis (TSC2) with cerebral, renal and hepatic involvement admitted to the Liver Unit for severe malnutrition, anorexia and abdominal pain. MRI showed a grossly enlarged liver, causing severe gastric compression. The liver was entirely filled with multiple nodular lesions of different sizes. Liver biopsy showed tumoral tissue with microscopic and ultrastructural features of angiomyolipoma. All liver function tests were repeatedly normal. Prior to considering the patient for partial hepatectomy, she was administered tamoxifen (20mg b.i.d). RESULTS: After 6 months of tamoxifen treatment a greatly improved quality of life and a significant weight gain were observed. After 12 months the clinical conditions further improved and the MRI showed a significant reduction of the largest lesion with a liquid central area and a diminished compression of the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: This is to our knowledge the first report in which tamoxifen has been successfully used in a TSC patient with multiple liver angiomyolipomas.