Bidirectionality of antiseizure and antipsychotic treatment: A population-based study.

PURPOSE: To study the prevalence and directionality of comorbid epilepsy and psychosis in Norway. METHODS: The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) provided individual-based information on all antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs (APDs) dispensed during 2004-2017. Subjects were ≥18 years of age at the end of the study period. Diagnosis-specific reimbursement codes from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases/2nd edition of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICD-10/ICPC-2) combined with ATC codes were used as indicators of diagnosis. Subjects had collected ASMs for epilepsy or APDs for psychosis at least four times, at least once issued with an ICD-10 code from the specialist healthcare service. Directionality was analyzed in subjects receiving both treatments. To reduce prevalent comorbidity bias, we employed a four-year comorbidity-free period (2004-2007). The use of specific ASMs and APDs was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 31,289 subjects had collected an ASM for epilepsy at least four times, 28,889 an APD for psychosis. Both the prevalence of treatment for epilepsy and of treatment for psychosis was 0.8%. Further, 891 subjects had been treated for both conditions; 2.8% with epilepsy had been treated for psychosis, and 3.1% with psychosis had been treated for epilepsy. Among 558 subjects included in the analyses of directionality, 56% had collected the first APD before an ASM, whereas 41% had collected an ASM first. During the last year prior to comorbidity onset, levetiracetam, topiramate, or zonisamide had been used for epilepsy by approximately 40%, whereas olanzapine and quetiapine were most used in patients with psychosis, and clozapine in 13%. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients with prior antipsychotic treatment at onset of epilepsy is higher than previously acknowledged, as demonstrated in this nation-wide study. Apart from a shared neurobiological susceptibility, the bidirectionality of epilepsy and psychosis may be influenced by various environmental factors, including the interaction of pharmacodynamic effects. APDs may facilitate seizures; ASMs may induce psychiatric symptoms. In patients with combined treatment, these potential drug effects should receive ample attention, along with the psychosocial consequences of the disorders. A prudent multi-professional approach is required.

SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents in Norway: confirmed infection, hospitalisations and underlying conditions. / Sars-CoV-2 hos barn og ungdom i Norge: påvist smitte, sykehusinnleggelser og underliggende tilstander.

BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents are at lower risk of disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. We describe the incidence of confirmed infection and hospitalisation of children and adolescents under the age of 20 in Norway, and specifically among those with underlying conditions. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The Norwegian Directorate of Health has collaborated with the Norwegian Institute of Public Health on the establishment of a data extraction system to monitor the coronavirus outbreak. Data from the specialist health service (Norwegian Patient Registry, NPR), and the primary health service (Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care, NRPHC) are linked to data on positive SARS-CoV-2 tests from the Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases (MSIS). This covers all persons living in Norway as of 1 March 2020, with data on confirmed infection up to and including 13 May 2020 and on hospitalisations up to and including 30 April 2020. RESULTS: Of 8 125 persons with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in the whole population, 493 (6.1 %) were under 20 years old. The median age of the under-20s was 15 years, and 252 (51 %) were girls. 3 % were hospitalised. No deaths were registered among patients aged under 20 in Norway. We found a somewhat larger share with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in the group with diseases of the neuromuscular system. INTERPRETATION: Few children and adolescents have had SARS-CoV-2 confirmed, and only a very few have been hospitalised. Underlying conditions may result in a lower threshold for testing, and hence a higher incidence of confirmed infection in this group, although higher risk cannot be excluded.

Underlying conditions in adults with COVID-19. / Underliggende tilstander hos voksne med covid-19.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases, cancer, type-2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were initially noted as the most common diseases among individuals who were hospitalised for COVID-19. However, the evidence base is weak. The objective of this study is to describe how selected diseases were distributed among adults with confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-19 positive tests) and among those hospitalised for COVID-19 compared to the general population. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We used data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care and the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases for adults from the age of 20 and older for the period 1 March 2020-13 May 2020. RESULTS: Of all those who tested positive for COVID-19, 7 632 (94 %) were aged 20 years or older, and 1 025 (13.4 %) of these had been hospitalised. Among those hospitalised with COVID-19, there was a higher proportion of individuals with cardiovascular diseases (18.3 % versus 15.6 %), cancer (6.9 % versus 5.4 %), type-2 diabetes (8.6 % versus 5.2 %) and COPD (3.8 % versus 2.7 %) than in the general population as a whole after adjusting for age. The proportion of hospitalised patients with asthma, other chronic respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, ongoing cancer treatment, complications related to hypertension, obesity and overweight, neurological disorders and cardiac and renal failure was also higher than in the general population. There were few differences between persons who had tested positive for COVID-19 and the general population in terms of underlying conditions. INTERPRETATION: Among those hospitalised for COVID-19, there was a higher proportion of patients with underlying illnesses than in the general population. This may indicate that these patients tend to have a more severe course of disease or that they are more likely to be hospitalised compared to healthy individuals. The results must be interpreted with caution, since the sample of COVID-19 individuals is non-random.

Upper secondary school leaving celebrations and final exams - consultations in general practice and emergency care. / Russefeiring og eksamenstid ­ bruk av fastlege og legevakt.

BACKGROUND: Increased use of antibiotics and a higher rate of injury in May for 19-year-olds have been described earlier. We examined whether 19-year-olds also demonstrate greater use of general practitioner services at the time of russefeiring ­ celebrations in connection with completion of upper secondary school. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study is based on data from the Directorate of Health's system for the control and payment of reimbursements to healthcare providers (KUHR) for all consultations in the general practitioner services for age group 18 ­ 20 years in the period 2012 ­ 15. The number of consultations per month and age group were analysed using Poisson regression, with 19-year-olds in March as a reference group. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was the outcome measure. RESULTS: All calendar years showed a sharp increase in the number of consultations among 19-year-olds in May in all calendar years compared with other calendar months and the cohorts above and below. The incidence rate ratio for consultations with GPs and emergency departments was 1.40 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.38 ­ 1.41) and 2.07 (95 % CI 2.02 ­ 2.13). The increase was greatest for respiratory infections (IRR 3.64, 95 % CI 3.55 ­ 3.73). The incidence rate ratio for injuries was 1.21 (95 % CI 1.16 ­ 1.27). The increase commenced in the three weeks before 17 May (Constitution Day) and persisted in the following two weeks. INTERPRETATION: The sharp increase in the number of consultations for 19-year-olds in the general practitioner services is associated timewise with celebrations in connection with completion of upper secondary school (russefeiring). More frequent contact with these services lasts well into the ensuing examination period.

Burden of medically attended influenza in Norway 2008-2017.

BACKGROUND: The burden of influenza in Norway remains uncertain, and data on seasonal variations and differences by age groups are needed. OBJECTIVE: To describe number of patients diagnosed with influenza in Norway each season and the number treated in primary or specialist health care by age. Further, to compare the burden of seasonal influenza with the 2009-2010 pandemic outbreak. METHODS: We used Norwegian national health registries and identified all patients diagnosed with influenza from 2008 to 2017. We calculated seasonal rates, compared hospitalized patients with patients in primary care and compared seasonal influenza with the 2009-2010 pandemic outbreak. RESULTS: Each season, on average 1.7% of the population were diagnosed with influenza in primary care, the average rate of hospitalization was 48 per 100 000 population while the average number of hospitalized patients each season was nearly 2500. The number of hospitalized influenza patients ranged from 579 in 2008-2009 to 4973 in 2016-2017. Rates in primary care were highest among young adults while hospitalization rates were highest in patients 80 years and older and in children below 5 years. The majority of in-hospital deaths were in patients 70 years and older. Fewer patients were hospitalized during the 2009-2010 pandemic than in seasonal outbreaks, but during the pandemic, more people in the younger age groups were hospitalized and fatal cases were younger. CONCLUSION: Influenza causes a substantial burden in primary care and hospitals. In non-pandemic seasons, people above 80 years have the highest risk of influenza hospitalization and death.