Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 142(23): e432-e447, 2020 12 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147996

RESUMO

In 2010, the American Heart Association published a statement concluding that the existing scientific evidence was consistent with a causal relationship between exposure to fine particulate matter and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and that fine particulate matter exposure is a modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Since the publication of that statement, evidence linking air pollution exposure to cardiovascular health has continued to accumulate and the biological processes underlying these effects have become better understood. This increasingly persuasive evidence necessitates policies to reduce harmful exposures and the need to act even as the scientific evidence base continues to evolve. Policy options to mitigate the adverse health impacts of air pollutants must include the reduction of emissions through action on air quality, vehicle emissions, and renewable portfolio standards, taking into account racial, ethnic, and economic inequality in air pollutant exposure. Policy interventions to improve air quality can also be in alignment with policies that benefit community and transportation infrastructure, sustainable food systems, reduction in climate forcing agents, and reduction in wildfires. The health care sector has a leadership role in adopting policies to contribute to improved environmental air quality as well. There is also potentially significant private sector leadership and industry innovation occurring in the absence of and in addition to public policy action, demonstrating the important role of public-private partnerships. In addition to supporting education and research in this area, the American Heart Association has an important leadership role to encourage and support public policies, private sector innovation, and public-private partnerships to reduce the adverse impact of air pollution on current and future cardiovascular health in the United States.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , American Heart Association , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Política Pública , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 189(5): 512-9, 2014 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24400619

RESUMO

Recent changes in the global climate system have resulted in excess mortality and morbidity, particularly among susceptible individuals with preexisting cardiopulmonary disease. These weather patterns are projected to continue and intensify as a result of rising CO2 levels, according to the most recent projections by climate scientists. In this Pulmonary Perspective, motivated by the American Thoracic Society Committees on Environmental Health Policy and International Health, we review the global human health consequences of projected changes in climate for which there is a high level of confidence and scientific evidence of health effects, with a focus on cardiopulmonary health. We discuss how many of the climate-related health effects will disproportionally affect people from economically disadvantaged parts of the world, who contribute relatively little to CO2 emissions. Last, we discuss the financial implications of climate change solutions from a public health perspective and argue for a harmonized approach to clean air and climate change policies.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Mudança Climática , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/economia , Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Mudança Climática/economia , Desastres/economia , Desastres/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ambiental , Saúde Global , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Saúde Pública , Doenças Respiratórias/economia , Doenças Respiratórias/mortalidade , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle
4.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 21(3): 365-376, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426826

RESUMO

Indoor sources of air pollution worsen indoor and outdoor air quality. Thus, identifying and reducing indoor pollutant sources would decrease both indoor and outdoor air pollution, benefit public health, and help address the climate crisis. As outdoor sources come under regulatory control, unregulated indoor sources become a rising percentage of the problem. This American Thoracic Society workshop was convened in 2022 to evaluate this increasing proportion of indoor contributions to outdoor air quality. The workshop was conducted by physicians and scientists, including atmospheric and aerosol scientists, environmental engineers, toxicologists, epidemiologists, regulatory policy experts, and pediatric and adult pulmonologists. Presentations and discussion sessions were centered on 1) the generation and migration of pollutants from indoors to outdoors, 2) the sources and circumstances representing the greatest threat, and 3) effective remedies to reduce the health burden of indoor sources of air pollution. The scope of the workshop was residential and commercial sources of indoor air pollution in the United States. Topics included wood burning, natural gas, cooking, evaporative volatile organic compounds, source apportionment, and regulatory policy. The workshop concluded that indoor sources of air pollution are significant contributors to outdoor air quality and that source control and filtration are the most effective measures to reduce indoor contributions to outdoor air. Interventions should prioritize environmental justice: Households of lower socioeconomic status have higher concentrations of indoor air pollutants from both indoor and outdoor sources. We identify research priorities, potential health benefits, and mitigation actions to consider (e.g., switching from natural gas to electric stoves and transitioning to scent-free consumer products). The workshop committee emphasizes the benefits of combustion-free homes and businesses and recommends economic, legislative, and education strategies aimed at achieving this goal.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Poluição do Ar , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Gás Natural , Monitoramento Ambiental , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , Poluição do Ar/análise , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Material Particulado/análise
6.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ; 31(1): 1-20, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32952154

RESUMO

Wildfire smoke is an increasing environmental health threat to which children are particularly vulnerable, for both physiologic and behavioral reasons. To address the need for improved public health messaging this review summarizes current knowledge and knowledge gaps in the health effects of wildfire smoke in children, as well as tools for public health response aimed at children, including consideration of low-cost sensor data, respirators, and exposures in school environments. There is an established literature of health effects in children from components of ambient air pollution, which are also present in wildfire smoke, and an emerging literature on the effects of wildfire smoke, particularly for respiratory outcomes. Low-cost particulate sensors demonstrate the spatial variability of pollution, including wildfire smoke, where children live and play. Surgical masks and respirators can provide limited protection for children during wildfire events, with expected decreases of roughly 20%  and 80% for surgical masks and N95 respirators, respectively. Schools should improve filtration to reduce exposure of our nation's children to smoke during wildfire events. The evidence base described may help clinical and public health authorities provide accurate information to families to improve their decision making.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Incêndios Florestais , Criança , Exposição Ambiental , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Fumaça/efeitos adversos
7.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 180(10): 1023-9, 2009 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19897774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 1997 American Thoracic Society (ATS) statement "A Framework for Health Care Policy in the United States" outlined core principles for the Society's activities in the public health arena. In the succeeding 10 years, profound changes have taken place in the United States health care environment. In addition, the 2005 publication of the Society's Vision highlighted some differences between the original Statement and our current priorities. Therefore, the Health Policy Committee embarked on a re-analysis and re-statement of the Society's attitudes and strategies with respect to health and public policy. This Statement reflects the findings of the Committee. PURPOSE: To outline the key aspects of an internal ATS strategy for the promotion of respiratory and sleep/wake health and the care of the critically ill in the United States. METHODS: Committee discussion and consensus-building occurred both before and after individual members performed literature searches and drafted sections of the document. Comments were solicited on the draft document from ATS committee and assembly chairs and the Executive Committee, resulting in substantive revisions of the final document. RESULTS: Specific strategies are suggested for the ATS in the arenas of research, training and education, patient care, and advocacy so as to enhance the delivery of health care in the fields of respiratory medicine, sleep medicine, and critical care. CONCLUSIONS: The American Thoracic Society's Mission, Core Principles, and Vision provide clear guidance for the formulation of specific strategies that will serve to promote improved respiratory health and care of the critically ill in the United States.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Respiração , Sono/fisiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Vigília/fisiologia , Política de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos
8.
Clin Chest Med ; 41(4): 771-776, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153694

RESUMO

Catastrophic wildfires are increasing around the globe as climate change continues to progress. Another risk factor for large wildfires in the western United States is a legacy of fire suppression that has allowed overgrowth of underbrush and small trees in forests where periodic lightning-sparked wildfires are part of the natural ecosystem. Wildfire smoke contains CO2, CO, NOx, particulate matter, complex hydrocarbons (including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), and irritant gases, including many of the same toxic and carcinogenic substances as cigarette smoke. The public need clear and consistent messaging to understand that wildland fire smoke poses a health risk.


Assuntos
Saúde Pública/normas , Incêndios Florestais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
9.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147302

RESUMO

Studies evaluating the health impacts of climate change, predict that the frequency and intensity of wildfires will increase as climate change creates longer, warmer, and drier seasons. Although respiratory morbidity in the immediate aftermath of wildfires is well documented for pediatric populations, other acute and chronic health effects from wildfires for pediatric populations are less well known. This manuscript addresses questions that arise for families, healthcare providers and school districts in areas affected by wildfires and reviews key messages that healthcare providers may provide to pediatric patients and families to minimize adverse health effects from exposure to the smoke and ash from wildfires.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/prevenção & controle , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Incêndios Florestais , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , California , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Lactente , Instituições Acadêmicas , Fumaça/prevenção & controle
10.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 16(12): 1478-1487, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31774324

RESUMO

Air pollution is a grave risk to human health that affects nearly everyone in the world and nearly every organ in the body. Fortunately, it is largely a preventable risk. Reducing pollution at its source can have a rapid and substantial impact on health. Within a few weeks, respiratory and irritation symptoms, such as shortness of breath, cough, phlegm, and sore throat, disappear; school absenteeism, clinic visits, hospitalizations, premature births, cardiovascular illness and death, and all-cause mortality decrease significantly. The interventions are cost-effective. Reducing factors causing air pollution and climate change have strong cobenefits. Although regions with high air pollution have the greatest potential for health benefits, health improvements continue to be associated with pollution decreases even below international standards. The large response to and short time needed for benefits of these interventions emphasize the urgency of improving global air quality and the importance of increasing efforts to reduce pollution at local levels.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ambiental/normas , Saúde Global , Nível de Saúde , Mudança Climática , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos
11.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 15(Suppl 2): S114-S117, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29676643

RESUMO

The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and the temperature of the earth's surface have been rising in parallel for decades, with the former recently reaching 400 parts per million, consistent with a 1.5°C increase in global warming. Climate change models predict that a "business as usual" approach, that is, no effort to control CO2 emissions from combustion of fossil fuels, will result in a more than 2°C increase in annual average surface temperature by approximately 2034. With atmospheric warming comes increased air pollution. The concept of a "climate gap" in air quality control captures the decreased effectiveness of regulatory policies to reduce pollution with a hotter climate. Sources of greenhouse gases and climate-forcing aerosols ("black carbon") are the same sources of air pollutants that harm health. California has adopted robust climate change mitigation policies that are also designed to achieve public health cobenefits by improving air quality. These policies include advanced clean car standards, renewable energy, a sustainable communities strategy to limit suburban sprawl, a low carbon fuel standard, and energy efficiency. A market-based mechanism to put a price on CO2 emissions is the cap-and-trade program that allows capped facilities to trade state-issued greenhouse gas emissions allowances. The "cap" limits total greenhouse gas emissions from all covered sources, and declines over time to progressively reduce emissions. An alternative approach is a carbon tax. California's leadership on air quality and climate change mitigation is increasingly important, given the efforts to slow or even reverse implementation of such policies at the U.S. national level.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , Mudança Climática , Gases de Efeito Estufa , California , Humanos , Liderança , Material Particulado , Políticas
12.
Environ Health Perspect ; 123(4): 285-92, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With 40% of the world's population relying on solid fuel, household air pollution (HAP) represents a major preventable risk factor for COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Meta-analyses have confirmed this relationship; however, constituent studies are observational, with virtually none measuring exposure directly. OBJECTIVES: We estimated associations between HAP exposure and respiratory symptoms and lung function in young, nonsmoking women in rural Guatemala, using measured carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations in exhaled breath and personal air to assess exposure. METHODS: The Randomized Exposure Study of Pollution Indoors and Respiratory Effects (RESPIRE) Guatemala study was a trial comparing respiratory outcomes among 504 women using improved chimney stoves versus traditional cookstoves. The present analysis included 456 women with data from postintervention surveys including interviews at 6, 12, and 18 months (respiratory symptoms) and spirometry and CO (ppm) in exhaled breath measurements. Personal CO was measured using passive diffusion tubes at variable times during the study. Associations between CO concentrations and respiratory health were estimated using random intercept regression models. RESULTS: Respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, wheeze, or chest tightness) during the previous 6 months were positively associated with breath CO measured at the same time of symptom reporting and with average personal CO concentrations during the follow-up period. CO in exhaled breath at the same time as spirometry was associated with lower lung function [average reduction in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec) for a 10% increase in CO was 3.33 mL (95% CI: -0.86, -5.81)]. Lung function measures were not significantly associated with average postintervention personal CO concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide further support for the effects of HAP exposures on airway inflammation. Further longitudinal research modeling continuous exposure to particulate matter against lung function will help us understand more fully the impact of HAP on COPD.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Incêndios , Fenômenos Fisiológicos Respiratórios/efeitos dos fármacos , Madeira , Adulto , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Monóxido de Carbono/análise , Culinária , Feminino , Humanos , Material Particulado/análise , População Rural , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Environ Health Perspect ; 120(5): 715-20, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22538066

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Extreme hot weather conditions have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but risks are not evenly distributed throughout the population. Previously, a heat vulnerability index (HVI) was created to geographically locate populations with increased vulnerability to heat in metropolitan areas throughout the United States. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether areas with higher heat vulnerability, as characterized by the HVI, experienced higher rates of morbidity and mortality on abnormally hot days. METHODS: We used Poisson regression to model the interaction of HVI and deviant days (days whose deviation of maximum temperature from the 30-year normal maximum temperature is at or above the 95th percentile) on hospitalization and mortality counts in five states participating in the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network for the years 2000 through 2007. RESULTS: The HVI was associated with higher hospitalization and mortality rates in all states on both normal days and deviant days. However, associations were significantly stronger (interaction p-value < 0.05) on deviant days for heat-related illness, acute renal failure, electrolyte imbalance, and nephritis in California, heat-related illness in Washington, all-cause mortality in New Mexico, and respiratory hospitalizations in Massachusetts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the HVI may be a marker of health vulnerability in general, although it may indicate greater vulnerability to heat in some cases.


Assuntos
Clima , Saúde Ambiental , Exaustão por Calor/epidemiologia , Temperatura Alta , Saúde Pública , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Proc Am Thorac Soc ; 7(2): 98-101, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20427578

RESUMO

A major source of air pollution exposure in the developing world is smoke due to inefficient cooking with biomass fuels in poorly ventilated homes. Biomass fuel refers to any recently living plant- and/or animal-based material that is deliberately burned by humans as fuel, including wood, crop residues, and animal dung. The levels of exposure to particulate matter in such homes are often at least an order of magnitude higher than the highest concentrations that occur in the ambient air of the developed world. Because roughly half the world's population cooks daily with unprocessed biomass fuel, the potential public health impact is huge. The World Health Organization has estimated that indoor air pollution from solid fuel use is responsible for 2.6% of the total global burden of disease and between 1.5 and 2 million deaths each year, primarily due to acute lower respiratory infection in young children and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adult women. Major limitations of the existing epidemiologic literature include lack of actual exposure measurements, lack of longitudinal studies, inadequate exposure-response information, and few intervention studies. Ongoing research in Guatemala is attempting to address these data gaps.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Culinária , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/prevenção & controle , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Biomassa , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA