Breakthrough invasive fungal diseases in acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving mould active triazole primary prophylaxis after intensive chemotherapy: An Italian consensus agreement on definitions and management.

In the attempt to establish definitions and provide shared approaches to breakthrough invasive fungal diseases (br-IFD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients submitted to intensive chemotherapy and receiving triazoles as mould active primary antifungal prophylaxis (MA-PAP), literature on br-IFD in AML patients receiving triazoles MA-PAP was reviewed and a Consensus Development Conference Project was convened. The following four candidate key-questions were generated and formed the set of questions of the present document: "definition of br-IFD," "diagnostic strategy during MA-PAP to detect br-IFD," "possible causes of MA-PAP failure," "management of br-IFD."

Evaluation of the practice of antifungal prophylaxis use in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: results from the SEIFEM 2010-B registry.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) with posaconazole and itraconazole in a real-life setting of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during the first induction of remission. METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2011, all patients with newly diagnosed AML were consecutively registered and prospectively monitored at 30 Italian hematological centers. Our analysis focused on adult patients who received intensive chemotherapy and a mold-active AFP for at least 5 days. To determine the efficacy of prophylaxis, invasive fungal disease (IFD) incidence, IFD-attributable mortality, and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 515 patients were included in the present analysis. Posaconazole was the most frequently prescribed drug (260 patients [50%]) followed by fluconazole (148 [29%]) and itraconazole (93 [18%]). When comparing the groups taking posaconazole and itraconazole, there were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristics, whereas there were significant differences in the percentage of breakthrough IFDs (18.9% with posaconazole and 38.7% with itraconazole, P< .001). The same trend was observed when only proven/probable mold infections were considered (posaconazole, 2.7% vs itraconazole, 10.7%, P= .02). There were no significant differences in the IFD-associated mortality rate, while posaconazole prophylaxis had a significant impact on overall survival at day 90 (P= .002). CONCLUSIONS: During the last years, the use of posaconazole prophylaxis in high-risk patients has significantly increased. Although our study was not randomized, it demonstrates in a real-life setting that posaconazole prophylaxis confers an advantage in terms of both breakthrough IFDs and overall survival compared to itraconazole prophylaxis. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01315925.

Invasive Candidiasis in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Anidulafungin: A Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Six Pooled Studies.

BACKGROUND: Solid tumors are a common predisposing factor for invasive candidiasis (IC) or candidemia due to IC. OBJECTIVES: Post hoc analysis of patient-level efficacy and safety data from six studies of anidulafungin (with similar protocols/endpoints) in adults with IC/candidemia summarized by past or recent diagnosis of solid tumors. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients received a single intravenous (IV) dose of anidulafungin 200 mg, followed by 100 mg once daily. After ≥ 5 to ≥ 10 days of IV treatment, switch to oral voriconazole/fluconazole was permitted in all but one study. Time of solid tumor diagnosis was defined as past, ≥ 6; and recent, < 6 months prior to study entry. Primary endpoint: global response of success (GRS) rate at the end of IV therapy (EOIVT). Secondary endpoints included the GRS rate at the end of all therapy (EOT), all-cause mortality, and safety. RESULTS: The GRS rate in the overall population was 73.4% at EOIVT and 65.5% at EOT. Past or recent solid tumor diagnosis did not affect GRS at EOIVT or EOT (past: 75.5% and 71.4%; recent: 72.2% and 62.2%, respectively). All-cause mortality was 14.4% on day 14 and 20.1% at day 28. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate in severity (81.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of IC was effective regardless of the time of solid tumor diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Data were pooled from six studies: NCT00496197 (first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov on July 4, 2007); NCT00548262 (first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov on October 23, 2007); NCT00537329 (first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov on October 1, 2007); NCT00689338 (first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov on June 3, 2008); NCT00806351 (first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov on December 10, 2008); NCT00805740 (first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov on December 10, 2008).

Patients with solid tumor cancers (cancer of internal organs) have increased risk of fungal infections that can spread in the body through the blood. Infection with Candida species, known as invasive candidiasis (IC) (Candida invades the body in places normally free from germs) or candidemia (Candida infection in the blood), can cause severe illness and/or death. Anidulafungin is an antifungal drug recommended to treat IC/candidemia. This post hoc analysis looked at how effective and safe anidulafungin was in adult patients with IC/candidemia with 'recent' or 'past' history of solid tumors. The analysis included patients diagnosed with cancer less than 6 months before (recent history) or more than 6 months before (past history) they first received anidulafungin. Patients received anidulafungin by injection (intravenously [IV]) into the veins and, for continued treatment, were able to take a different antifungal drug orally. Of 539 patients from six studies, 139 had confirmed IC/candidemia and a history of solid tumors. Approximately 7 out of 10 (72%) patients were cured or no longer had signs of Candida infection at the end of IV anidulafungin treatment. Results were similar in patients with past or recent diagnosis of solid tumors. Treatment side effects reported in approximately 8 out of 10 (82%) patients were mild-to-moderate in severity. This analysis suggests anidulafungin was well tolerated and effective at treating IC/candidemia in patients with solid tumors, whether diagnosed recently or in the past.