National Football League Head, Neck and Spine Committee's Concussion Diagnosis and Management Protocol: 2017-18 season.

One of the National Football League's (NFL) Head, Neck and Spine Committee's principal goals is to create a 'best practice' protocol for concussion diagnosis and management for its players. The science related to concussion diagnosis and management continues to evolve, thus the protocol has evolved contemporaneously. The Fifth International Conference on Concussion in Sport was held in Berlin in 2016, and guidelines for sports concussion diagnosis and management were revised and refined. The NFL Head, Neck and Spine Committee has synthesised the most recent empirical evidence for sports concussion diagnosis and management including the Berlin consensus statement and tailored it to the game played in the NFL. One of the goals of the Committee is to provide a standardised, reliable, efficient and evidence-based protocol for concussion diagnosis and management that can be applied in this professional sport during practice and game day. In this article, the end-of-season version of the 2017-18 NFL Concussion Diagnosis and Management Protocol is described along with its clinical rationale. Immediate actions for concussion programme enhancement and research are reviewed. It is the Committee's expectation that the protocol will undergo refinement and revision over time as the science and clinical practice related to concussion in sports crystallise.

Participating in Two Video Concussion Education Programs Sequentially Improves Concussion-Reporting Intention.

Undiagnosed concussions increase the risk of additional concussion and persistent symptoms from concussion. Because there are no reliable objective markers of concussion, self-reporting of subjective and non-visible symptoms are critical to ensuring proper concussion management. For this reason, educational interventions target concussion reporting, but the majority of studies have examined the efficacy of single educational interventions or compared interventions to one another. This randomized crossover study sought to identify whether there was benefit to administering multiple concussion education programs in tandem, back to back. The study randomized 313 male high school football players to first receive CrashCourse concussion education (CC) or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention video concussion education (CDC) followed by crossover with the other education. Athlete concussion-reporting intention, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and enjoyment of education were assessed at baseline and after each intervention. There were statistically significant improvements across all measures, both after single intervention and crossover (all p < 0.001). Secondary analyses examining differences between education found that athletes reported higher enjoyment of concussion education immediately after participating in CC, as compared to CDC (p < 0.001). These findings demonstrate an additive benefit to implementing CC and CDC education in tandem, without decrement in enjoyment of concussion education after experiencing dual educations; in fact, enjoyment of concussion education improved after receiving education programs back to back. These educational programs appear to complement one another, and the results support the use of multi-modal concussion education to differentially target and maximize concussion reporting.

A helmetless-tackling intervention in American football for decreasing head impact exposure: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a behavioral intervention to reduce head impact exposure in youth playing American football. DESIGN: Nested randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants, ages 14-17 years, wore head impact sensors (SIM-G™) during two seasons of play. Those randomized to the intervention group underwent weekly tackling/blocking drills performed without helmets (WoH) and shoulder pads while the control group trained as normal, matching frequency and duration. Research personnel provided daily oversight to maintain fidelity. Head impact frequency (≥10g) per athlete exposure (ImpAE) was analyzed over time (two 11-week seasons) using mixed effect models or ANCOVA. Secondary outcomes included exposure-type (training, game) and participation level (entry-level versus upper-level secondary education). RESULTS: One-hundred fifteen participants (59 WoH, 56 control) met compliance criteria, contributing 47,382 head impacts and 10,751 athlete exposures for analysis. WoH had fewer ImpAE during games compared to control participants at weeks 4 (p=0.0001 season 1, p=0.0005 season 2) and 7 (p=0.0001 both seasons). Upper-level WoH participants had less ImpAE during games than their matched controls at weeks 4 (p=0.017 and p=0.026) and 7 (p=0.037 and p=0.014) in both seasons, respectively. Upper-level WoH also had fewer ImpAE during training at week 7 (p=0.015) in season one. CONCLUSIONS: Tackling and blocking drills performed without a helmet during training reduced the frequency of head impacts during play, especially during games. However, these differences disappeared by the end of the season. Future research should explore the frequency of behavioral intervention and a dose-response relationship considering years of player experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT02519478.

Traumatic abdominal hernia and lateral compression type 1 pelvic fracture: a case report.

Pelvic fractures often are associated with concomitant injuries. In general, the more severe the pelvic fracture, the more likely other, potentially life-threatening injuries exist. We present a case of a typical type 1 lateral compression pelvic fracture with the less common associated injury of abdominal wall muscle disruption and large-bowel herniation.

Determining brain fitness to fight: Has the time come?

Professional boxing is associated with a risk of chronic neurological injury, with up to 20-50% of former boxers exhibiting symptoms of chronic brain injury. Chronic traumatic brain injury encompasses a spectrum of disorders that are associated with long-term consequences of brain injury and remains the most difficult safety challenge in modern-day boxing. Despite these concerns, traditional guidelines used for return to sport participation after concussion are inconsistently applied in boxing. Furthermore, few athletic commissions require either formal consultation with a neurological specialist (i.e. neurologist, neurosurgeon, or neuropsychologist) or formal neuropsychological testing prior to return to fight. In order to protect the health of boxers and maintain the long-term viability of a sport associated with exposure to repetitive head trauma, we propose a set of specific requirements for brain safety that all state athletic commissions would implement.

National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sport concussion.

OBJECTIVE: To provide athletic trainers, physicians, and other health care professionals with best-practice guidelines for the management of sport-related concussions. BACKGROUND: An estimated 3.8 million concussions occur each year in the United States as a result of sport and physical activity. Athletic trainers are commonly the first medical providers available onsite to identify and evaluate these injuries. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations for concussion management provided here are based on the most current research and divided into sections on education and prevention, documentation and legal aspects, evaluation and return to play, and other considerations.

How do emergency department physicians rate their orthopaedic on-call coverage?

PURPOSE: Throughout the United States, the lack of orthopaedic on-call coverage at many institutions has been described as a "crisis." This study sought to understand how emergency department (ED) physicians perceive their orthopaedic on-call coverage. Specifically, the study looked at availability of orthopaedic coverage, adequacy of coverage, and reasons for patient transfers. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, written questionnaires were mailed to the ED directors at 39 of the 41 emergency departments in New Hampshire and Vermont. The instrument consisted of 25 items. Survey domains included ED physician demographics, availability and adequacy of orthopaedic coverage, and reasons for patient transfer. All responses were anonymous. RESULTS: A total of 31 questionnaires was returned. Approximately one third (36%) of ED physicians reported they had full-time orthopaedic coverage with 8% reporting they "never" had coverage. Almost two thirds (64%) of respondents felt their daytime orthopaedic coverage was adequate, but this number dropped to 52% for night coverage and 48% for weekend coverage. Over half (55%) of respondents felt their orthopaedist was reluctant to come in to evaluate a patient when the ED physician felt the patient warranted orthopaedic consultation. Approximately half (52%) felt it was often the case that a patient's care could have been improved if they had been evaluated by an orthopaedist. Only 29% of respondents said their orthopaedist always came in when asked to evaluate a patient. The top three reasons ED physicians felt their orthopaedist declined to care for a patient were complexity of the injury, the time of day/night, and if it was a weekend. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: The findings in this study suggest there is substantial room for improvement in orthopaedic on-call coverage for emergency departments.