A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND: Few randomized trials have compared the results of Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy and excisional open hemorrhoidectomy. Few studies have reported long-term results. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy compared with excisional open hemorrhoidectomy in patients with grade III hemorrhoids. DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized study registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01263431). A power analysis assessed the study's sample size. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either hemorrhoidectomy or Doppler-guided hemorrhoid dearterialization plus mucopexy. The χ test, Mann-Whitney U test, Student t test, and a regression model were used, as appropriate. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive patients were treated for grade III hemorrhoids from July to November 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was postoperative pain. The secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, the resumption of social and/or working activity, patient satisfaction, and the relapse of symptoms at 1 and 24 months. RESULTS: No major complications occurred in either group. The median visual analog scale scores for pain in the hemorrhoidectomy and Doppler-guided dearterialization plus mucopexy groups on days 1, 7, 14, and 30 were 7 vs 5.5, 3 vs 2.5, 1 vs 0, and 0 vs 0 (p> 0.05). The median work resumption day was the 22nd in the hemorrhoidectomy group and the 10th in the Doppler-guided dearterialization plus mucopexy group (p = 0.09). Patient satisfaction at 1 and 24 postoperative months, with the use of a 4-point scale, was 3 vs 4 and 4 vs 4 (p > 0.05). During the follow-up, 2 patients in the dearterialization group required ambulatory treatment, and 1 patient in each group required further surgery for symptom relapse. LIMITATIONS: Nonvalidated questionnaires were used in the follow-up. Cost analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: Compared with hemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization with mucopexy resulted in similar postoperative pain and morbidity, and a similar long-term cure rate.

Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection.

INTRODUCTION: Both enhanced recovery programs (ERP) and laparoscopy can reduce complications and length of stay (LOS) in colon surgery. We investigated whether ERP further improved the short-term outcomes of scheduled laparoscopic colectomies. METHODS: We performed an audit of all patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic colon resection between January 2003 and August 2010 in our institution. An ERP including accelerated introduction of oral nutrition, mobilization, pain control, and catheter management was introduced in 2005. Demographic data, intra and postoperative details and 30-day ER visit and readmission rate were collected. We compared LOS and short-term outcomes for patients on the program with those receiving traditional postoperative care using Chi-square and regression models. Data are presented as median [25th, 75th percentile]. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: 136 (46%) of 297 eligible patients were enrolled in the ERP. At baseline, the two groups had similar demographic characteristics, but patients in the ERP were more likely to have their operation by a colorectal surgeon (p = 0.01). Patients in the ERP ate solids earlier (p < 0.001) and had earlier removal of their urinary catheter (p < 0.001). LOS was 4 [3, 6] days for both groups (p < 0.01), with more patients in the ERP discharged by POD 3 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for other variables, ERP enrolment remained an independent predictor of LOS (p < 0.01), along with age (p < 0.01) and in-hospital complications (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Patients in the ERP had significantly fewer ER visits (p = 0.02), but there were no differences in readmission rates. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic colectomy in a university-based clinical teaching unit, ERP can further reduce length of stay and postoperative ER visits without increasing readmission rates.