Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare policies have focused on centralizing care to high-volume centers in an effort to optimize patient outcomes; however, little is known about patients' and caregivers' considerations and selection process when selecting hospitals for care. We aim to explore how patients and caregivers select hospitals for complex cancer care and to develop a taxonomy for their selection considerations. METHODS: This was a qualitative study in which data were gathered from in-depth interviews conducted from March to November 2019 among patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancers who were scheduled to undergo a pancreatectomy (n = 20) at a metropolitan, urban regional, or suburban medical center and their caregivers (n = 10). RESULTS: The interviews revealed six broad domains that characterized hospital selection considerations: hospital factors, team characteristics, travel distance to hospital, referral or recommendation, continuity of care, and insurance considerations. The identified domains were similar between participants seen at the metropolitan center and urban/suburban medical centers, with the following exceptions: participants receiving care specifically at the metropolitan center noted operative volume and access to specific services such as clinical trials in their hospital selection; participants receiving care at urban/suburban centers noted health insurance considerations and having access to existing medical records in their hospital selection. CONCLUSIONS: This study delineates the many considerations of patients and caregivers when selecting hospitals for complex cancer care. These identified domains should be incorporated into the development and implementation of centralization policies to help increase patient access to high-quality cancer care that is consistent with their priorities and needs.

Reducing road traffic deaths: where should we focus global health initiatives?

BACKGROUND: Current global surgery initiatives focus on increasing surgical workforce; however, it is unclear whether this approach would be helpful globally, as patients in low-resource countries may not be able to reach hospitals in a timely fashion without formal Emergency Medical Services (EMS). We hypothesize that increased surgical workforce correlates with decreased road traffic deaths (RTDs) only in countries with EMS. METHODS: Estimated RTDs were obtained from the Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013, which estimated the RTD rate in 2010 (RTD 2010). The classification of EMS was defined by the Global Status Report on Road Safety 2009. The density of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and obstetricians (SAO density) and 2010 income classification were accessed from the World Bank. Multivariable regression analysis was performed adjusting for different countries, income levels, and trauma system characteristics. Sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: One-fourth of the countries reported not having formal EMS (n = 41, 23.4%). On adjusted analysis, SAO density was not associated with changes in RTD 2010 in countries without EMS (n = 25, P = 0.50). However, in countries with EMS, each increase in SAO density per 100,000 population decreased RTDs by 0.079 per 100,000 population (n = 97, P <0.001). Income was the only other factor resulting in reduced mortality rates (P = 0.004). Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in surgical workforce reduce RTDs only when EMS exist. Surgical workforce and EMS must be seen as part of the same system and developed together to maximize their effect in reducing RTDs. Global health initiatives should be tailored to individual country need. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Ecological study).

Health Care Costs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the postoperative costs associated with both anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in the two-year period following surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CDA has become an increasingly common alternative to ACDF for the treatment of cervical disc disorders. Although a number of studies have compared clinical outcomes between both procedures, much less is known about the postoperative economic burden of each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By analyzing a commercial insurance claims database (Marketscan, Merative), patients who underwent one-level or two-level ACDF and CDA procedures between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 were identified and included in the study. The primary outcome was the cost of payments for postoperative management in the two-year period following ACDF or CDA. Identified postoperative interventions included in the study were: (i) physical therapy, (ii) pain medication, (iii) injections, (iv) psychological treatment, and (iv) subsequent spine surgeries. RESULTS: Totally, 2304 patients (age: 49.0±9.4 yr; male, 50.1%) were included in the study. In all, 1723 (74.8%) patients underwent ACDF, while 581 (25.2%) underwent CDA. The cost of surgery was similar between both groups (ACDF: $26,819±23,449; CDA: $25,954±20,620; P =0.429). Thirty-day, 90-day, and two-year global costs were all lower for patients who underwent CDA compared with ACDF ($31,024 vs. $34,411, $33,064 vs. $37,517, and $55,723 vs. $68,113, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lower two-year health care costs were found for patients undergoing CDA compared with ACDF. Further work is necessary to determine the drivers of these findings and the associated longer-term outcomes.

Reducing Sharps Injuries in the Operating Rooms of an Academic Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence and distribution of operating room (OR) sterile field sharps injuries sustained by attending surgeons, residents, scrub nurses, and surgical technologists are limited. The goal of this study is to understand current practices, injuries, and reporting behavior at an academic center, implement interventions, and assess their effect on sharps safety and reporting. METHODS: An electronic survey with questions pertaining to sharps handling practices, injuries, and reporting was e-mailed to 864 staff between July and September 2014. Adjusted analyses for risk of injury were performed. A follow-up survey was sent in January 2018, following the implementation of a shorter injury reporting form and a neutral zone. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49.3%, with 363 completed surveys. Of respondents, 44.9% reported injuries occurring in the preceding three years. Physicians comprised 65.1% of injured staff and sustained 68.8% of the total injuries. Compared to attending surgeons, residents had a similar likelihood of injury (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-2.2), whereas scrub nurses (odds ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.17-0.54) and technologists (odds ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.14-0.76) had a lower likelihood. Half of those injured reported to Occupational Health Services. Of those who did not report, 46.4% stated that time was a limiting factor. Following the interventions, the incidence of injuries among survey respondents remained unchanged. However, 54.0% of respondents stated that it was easier to report injuries. CONCLUSION: Attending surgeons and residents sustain the majority of OR sterile field sharps injuries and are the least likely to report them. Shorter reports made it easier to report the injuries.

Structured Operative Autonomy: An Institutional Approach to Enhancing Surgical Resident Education Without Impacting Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although barriers to granting surgical residents autonomy in the operating room are well described, few have proposed practical strategies to overcome these barriers. Our department adopted a multidisciplinary approach to develop a rotation that aimed to grant chief residents structured operative autonomy. In this study, we assess the feasibility of implementation, impact on patient safety, and educational benefit to residents after the program's pilot year. STUDY DESIGN: During a 1-month rotation, chief residents began cases alone using their own operative block time. The attending surgeon was notified when the critical portion of the operation was reached and supervised its completion. Postoperative complications, intraoperative adverse events, readmissions, operation duration, and length of stay in a subset of patients that underwent a cholecystectomy or appendectomy were compared with patients operated on by standard resident services. Follow-up surveys were administered to residents 1 year after graduation. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four operations, which ranged in complexity, were performed by chief residents. Unadjusted subset analysis comparing the structured operative autonomy (n = 54) and standard resident (n = 718) services outcomes for appendectomies and cholecystectomies revealed no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complications (5.6% vs 4.0%; p = 0.59), major intraoperative adverse events, or readmissions (3.7% vs 3.8%; p = 1.00), respectively. Multivariate analysis performed for 30-day complications (odds ratio 0.8; 95% CI 0.2 to 3.2; p = 0.76) and readmissions (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI 0.1 to 2.1; p = 0.3) corroborated unadjusted findings. All participants (n = 8) strongly agreed that the rotation eased their transition to fellowship or independent practice. CONCLUSIONS: Structured operative autonomy overcomes known barriers to granting chief residents autonomy in the operating room. When used for select general surgery cases, resident education is enhanced without impacting patient outcomes. This training model has the potential to improve the surgical independence of graduating residents.

A multidisciplinary youth violence-prevention initiative: impact on attitudes.

BACKGROUND: In a previous report, enhanced resource commitment at a Level I trauma center was associated with improved outcomes for most major categories of injured patients, except those with gunshot wounds, which disproportionately affected the young (ages 15 to 24 years). We hypothesized that a primary violence-prevention initiative geared toward changing attitudes about interpersonal conflict among at-risk youths can be effective. STUDY DESIGN: Between May 2002 and November 2003, 97 youths (mean age 12.6 years) were recruited from one of two Police Athletic League centers in the catchment area of our Level I trauma center. Participant attitudes about interpersonal conflicts were surveyed with six previously validated scales before and after a hospital tour with a video and slide presentation graphically depicting the results of gun violence. Mean differences in scores between pre- and postintervention surveys were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 97 participants, 48 (49.4%) completed the intervention program with both the pre- and postintervention tests, with a mean of 25.8 days between tests. There was a statistically significant reduction in the Beliefs Supporting Aggression scale (mean -0.38 U; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.54; p < 0.01), and a trend toward reduced Likelihood of Violence (mean -0.17 U; 95% CI, 0.01 to -0.34; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary violence-prevention outreach program can produce short-term improvement in beliefs supporting aggression among at-risk youth. Longterm impact of this attitude change needs to be examined in future studies.