Impacts of Predischarge Diastolic Functional Recovery on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Hypertensive Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Diastolic function is an independent predictor of death in heart failure (HF), but the effect of a change in diastolic function during hospitalization on clinical outcomes in patients with hypertensive HF (HHF) has been poorly studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of predischarge diastolic functional recovery (DFR) on future clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with a first diagnosis of HHF.Methods and Results:A total of 175 hospitalized patients with HHF were divided into 2 groups according to the change in diastolic function on predischarge echocardiography in comparison with baseline echocardiography: DFR group (n=74, 54.2±17.1 years, 55 males) vs. no DFR group (n=101, 59.1±16.8 years, 72 males). During 66.5±37 months of clinical follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 89 patients: 85 HF rehospitalizations, 4 deaths, no MI. The number of MACE were significantly higher in the no DFR group than in the DFR group (61.6% vs. 32.4%, P<0.001). Predischarge systolic functional recovery was not a predictor of MACE, but impaired DFR was an independent predictor of MACE (RR=2.952, P=0.010, confidence interval, 1.878-6.955). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired predischarge DFR, regardless of the type of HF or predischarge systolic functional recovery, is an independent predictor of future MACE in HHF. Changes in diastolic function should be carefully monitored and would be useful in risk stratification of HHF.

Percutaneous Retrieval of Embolized Amplatzer Septal Occluder after Treatment of Double Atrial Septal Defect: A Case Report.

Embolization of the occlusion device after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is a potential disastrous complication. The usual site of embolization is the right side of the heart including pulmonary artery, but the device embolization to the extracardiac aorta is extremely rare. Here, we report a successful percutaneous retrieval case of the embolized Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) to the descending thoracic aorta after the successful deployment of two ASO devices in a patient with double ASD. Competition between the two devices to obtain a stable position may be an explanation for the migration of ASO.

Standard-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Anticoagulation with Warfarin in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anticoagulation with warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often has been decreased as an international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time 1.6-2.6 due to fear of bleeding, although universal criteria recommend an INR of 2.0-3.0. In this randomized, open-label trial, low-intensity anticoagulation (INR 1.6-2.6) was compared with standard-intensity anticoagulation (INR 2.0-3.0) with warfarin. A total 616 patients with AF and at least 1 risk factor for stroke were randomized to low-intensity anticoagulation (n = 308) and standard-intensity anticoagulation (n = 308) groups. The intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine differences. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. New-onset stroke occurred in 2 patients (0.44% per year) in the low-intensity group and 5 patients (1.05% per year) in the standard-intensity group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.08-2.15). Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (0.89% per year) in the low-intensity group and 5 patients (1.06% per year) in the standard-intensity group (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.22-3.11). The rate of the net clinical outcome (composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death) was 1.33% per year in the low-intensity group compared with 2.12% per year in the standard-intensity group (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.23-1.72). In Asian patients with AF, clinical outcomes were not different between low-intensity and standard-intensity anticoagulation with warfarin.

What is Standard Dose of Rivaroxaban in Elderly Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: 20ms versus. 15mg?

Although there is no age criterion for rivaroxaban dose reduction, elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often prescribed an off-label reduced dose. We aimed to evaluate whether age is a necessary criterion for rivaroxaban dose reduction in Korean patients with AF. Among 2208 patients who prescribed warfarin or rivaroxaban, 552 patients over 75 years without renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance >50 mL/min) were compared based on propensity score matching. The rivaroxaban group was further divided into a 20 mg (R20; on-label) and a 15 mg (R15; off-label). Primary net clinical benefit (NCB) was defined as the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Secondary NCB was defined as the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Patients were followed for 1 year, or until the first outcome occurrence. Both rivaroxaban groups had comparable efficacy compared with warfarin. However, both R20 (0.9% vs 7.4%, p = .014) and R15 (2.3% vs 7.4%, p = .018) had a significant reduction in major bleeding. There were no differences in efficacy or safety outcomes between R20 and R15. R20 had significantly reduced primary (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.93) and secondary (HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10-0.93) NCBs compared with warfarin. However, primary and secondary NCBs were not reduced in R15. In real-world practice with elderly patients with AF, off-label rivaroxaban dose reduction to 15 mg conferred no benefits. Therefore, guideline-adherent rivaroxaban 20 mg is favorable in elderly Korean patients with AF.