Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 13: 32, 2013 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23927387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies are the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial ablation. The LNG-IUS can be applied easily by the general practitioner, which saves costs, but has considerable failure rates. As an alternative, endometrial ablation is also very effective, but this treatment has to be performed by a gynaecologist. Due to lack of direct comparison of LNG-IUS with endometrial ablation, there is no evidence based preferred advice for the use of one of these treatment possibilities. METHOD/DESIGN: A multicenter randomised controlled trial, organised in a network infrastructure in the Netherlands in which general practitioners and gynaecologists collaborate. DISCUSSON: This study, considering both effectiveness and cost effectiveness of LNG-IUS versus endometrial ablation may well improve care for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR2984.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/métodos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/estatística & dados numéricos , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos , Resultado do Tratamento , Saúde da Mulher , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA