RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the front-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), where phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated their safety and efficacy. However, trial patients may not be representative of real-world patients (RWPs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate RWP clinical factors associated with effectiveness and safety in CML patients treated with TKIs. METHODS: Patients with CML treated with at least 30 days of imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib between 2014 and 2018 were included. Patients were stratified into categories based on the number of factors that would have precluded enrollment into pivotal TKI phase 3 trials (0, 1, ≥2). End points included complete hematologic response (CHR), early molecular response (EMR), major molecular response (MMR), adverse event (AE)-induced dose decreases, treatment interruptions, and treatment discontinuations. RESULTS: Final analyses included 174 patients. Patients with ≥2 factors had a higher risk of dose decreases (relative risk = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.02-2.34; P = 0.02) and a shorter time to dose decrease (hazard ratio = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.23-4.97; P = 0.006) compared with patients with 0 factors. Significant differences were observed in CHR at 1 month and MMR at 3 months between patients with 0 and ≥2 factors (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Approximately 60% of our RWPs would have been excluded from the pivotal phase 3 TKI trials. These data suggest that RWPs require more precise dosing to achieve CML clinical milestones and to mitigate AEs, but findings should be validated prospectively.
Assuntos
Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Dasatinibe/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/efeitos adversos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/induzido quimicamente , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In 2017, due to a fluid shortage secondary to Hurricane Maria's devastation of Puerto Rico, hospitals and health-systems began to substitute rolapitant for fosaprepitant as part of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention and treatment strategies. However, despite advantageous pharmacologic and formulation (e.g. long half-life, quicker time to onset, and lack of first-pass hepatic metabolism) profiles, there seems to be significant risk of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions associated with the administration of intravenous rolapitant. In January 2018, the U.S. FDA issued a Health Care Provider Letter stating that anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, and other serious hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in the postmarketing setting. Importantly, these reactions were observed at a higher rate than initially reported in the phase 1 bioequivalence study that led to FDA approval of intravenous rolapitant (2.8%), with many resulting in hospitalizations. At our institution, rolapitant-induced infusion-related reactions also occurred in more patients than expected (8.7%). Described herein are six cases of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions with intravenous rolapitant at the North Carolina Cancer Hospital. Due to the quick onset of the infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions with intravenous rolapitant, interpatient differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics are unlikely to be the cause. An objective assessment utilizing the Naranjo Causality Scale rates these infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions as definite adverse drug reactions.
Assuntos
Antagonistas dos Receptores de Neurocinina-1/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Espiro/administração & dosagem , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Institutos de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/prevenção & controle , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Neurocinina-1/efeitos adversos , North Carolina , Compostos de Espiro/efeitos adversos , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/prevenção & controle , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Clinically apparent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in approximately 7% of patients with membranous nephropathy. Hypoalbuminemia at diagnosis is an independent risk factor for VTE, and risk increases significantly as albumin falls. Optimal prophylactic and treatment anticoagulation regimens in the nephrotic syndrome remain unproven but novel oral anti-coagulants have become attractive therapeutic options. We describe a patient diagnosed with anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody positive membranous nephropathy and recurrent VTE while on therapeutic dosing of apixaban. A direct factor Xa inhibitor, apixaban has been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin for the treatment of VTE in the general population. However, because it is highly protein-bound, apixaban may have altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with nephrotic syndrome and hypoalbuminemia. This case report highlights the need for further studies of direct oral anticoagulants to fully assess their effectiveness in this high-risk population.
Assuntos
Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa/complicações , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Fondaparinux/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Albumina Sérica/metabolismo , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controleRESUMO
PURPOSE: Identify and summarize articles that describe the value that pharmacy residency training offers to sponsoring health systems. SUMMARY: There is a tremendous gap between the number of resident applicants and the number of pharmacy residencies available. Informing health-system administration executives about the proven value of residency training is key to expanding the number of available positions. To address this disparity, a comprehensive and systematic literature search to identify publications highlighting the value that pharmacy residency training provides to the sponsor hospital or health system was conducted. Articles were identified through query of PubMed and SciVerse SCOPUS and through review of bibliographies from relevant articles. Twenty articles were identified and summarized in this annotated bibliography that demonstrate perceived and quantitative value of pharmacy residency training for health systems that sponsor residency training. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy residency training programs are essential for pharmacists that will primarily engage in direct patient care activities. This annotated bibliography includes key publications that provide evidence of the value that pharmacy residents provide to the sponsoring health system. This manuscript will aid prospective residency directors interested in developing new residency positions at new institutions or for residency program directors interested in expanding the total number of resident positions available at the existing sites.