Phase II and pharmacologic study of docetaxel as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Because docetaxel (Taxotere, RP 56976; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) appeared to be active against breast cancer in phase I trials, we performed this phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with measurable disease were enrolled. Only prior hormone therapy was allowed, as was adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 12 months earlier. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered over 1 hour every 21 days. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride and/or corticosteroid premedication was added after hypersensitivity-like reactions (HSRs) were seen in two of the first six patients. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during cycle 1 for correlation with toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were assessable. Nineteen (51%) required dose reductions, usually for neutropenic fever. The median nadir WBC count was 1.4 x 10(3)/microL. HSRs were noted in 20 patients (54%). At a median cumulative dose of 297 mg/m2 (range, 99.6 to 424.5 mg/m2), 30 patients (81%) developed fluid retention, for which 11 (30%) subsequently stopped treatment. The first-cycle plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) did not correlate with toxicity, although an ineligible patient with hepatic metastases (pretreatment bilirubin level 1.8 mg/dL) had an elevated AUC and died of toxicity. Responses were seen at all sites. On an intent-to-treat basis, there were two (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 18 (49%) partial responses (PRs). The overall response proportion (CRs plus PRs) was 54% (95% confidence interval, 37% to 71%). The median time to response was 12 weeks (range, 3 to 15) and the median duration was 26 weeks (range, 10 to 58+). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is active for metastatic breast cancer. Neutropenia and fluid retention are dose-limiting. The AUC did not predict toxicity, but caution is warranted when treating patients with liver dysfunction. An understanding of the pathophysiology of the fluid retention may facilitate prevention. Frequent HSR may warrant prophylactic premedication.

Phase II study of semisynthetic paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer.

The aim of this phase II study was to characterise the efficacy and toxicity of semisynthetic paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients had measurable disease and had been treated with one prior chemotherapy regimen either as adjuvant or for metastatic disease. Semisynthetic paclitaxel was given at a dose of 175 mg/m2 over 3 h every 21 days with dexamethasone, cimetidine and diphenhydramine premedications. 31 patients were entered. All were evaluable for toxicity. 30 patients were evaluable for response because 1 patient was lost to follow-up after receiving one cycle. One patient achieved a complete response and 10 patients achieved partial responses for an overall response rate (CR + PR) of 37% (95% confidence interval 20-56%). 17 patients (55%) experienced at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. There were two episodes of febrile neutropenia complicating 155 cycles of therapy. One of these resulted in a treatment-related death in a patient with pulmonary metastasis. 3 patients required dose reductions for grade 3 sensory neuropathy. Our study shows that the antitumour activity and toxic effects of semisynthetic paclitaxel appear to be identical to the naturally occurring product.