Percutaneous Prodding Reduction and K-Wire Fixation Via Sinus Tarsi Approach Versus ORIF for Sanders Type III Calcaneal Fractures: A Prospective Case-Controlled Trial.

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of Sanders type III calcaneal fractures treated with percutaneous prodding reduction and K-wire fixation via a sinus tarsi approach (PPRKF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Fifty-one patients with closed, unilateral, Sanders type III calcaneal fractures were randomly assigned to the PPRKF group (n = 26) or the ORIF group (n = 25). The clinical outcomes evaluated were time to surgery, blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, wound healing time, wound complications, and Maryland foot score. Radiological results were evaluated on lateral and axial X-rays and computed tomography images and included Böhler's angle, Gissane's angle, and calcaneal width. Compared with the ORIF group, the PPRKF group had shorter time to surgery, shorter operative time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, shorter wound healing time, and fewer wound complications (p < .001). The postoperative Böhler's angle, Gissane's angle, and calcaneal width in both groups were significantly better than those measured preoperatively (p < .001) and did not differ between the PPRKF group and ORIF group (p> .05). Regarding clinical results, there was no significant difference in Maryland foot score between the two groups at 12 months after surgery (p > .05). Both PPRKF and ORIF can result in satisfactory clinical function. PPRKF is superior to ORIF in reducing the time to surgery, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, wound healing time, and wound complications.

A comparative study of clinical effect of total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis and osteoarthritis of Kashin-Beck disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoarthritis of Kashin-Beck disease (KBD). METHODS: This study enrolled 77 KBD patients (77 knees, KBD-TKA) and 75 OA patients (75 knees, OA-TKA) who underwent TKA from September 2008 to June 2018. Clinical assessments for each patient were performed pre-operatively and last follow-up. The efficacy measures included the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range of motion (ROM), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and short form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) as well as related influencing factors between the two groups. RESULTS: All patients were followed up; the follow-up time of KBD-TKA was 14-132 months, with an average of 72.68 ± 37.55 months; OA-TKA was 15-120 months, with an average of 49.2 ± 28.91 months. There was no difference in pre-operative VAS score (7.29 vs. 7.24) and SF-36 (PCS) score (4.87 vs. 5.49) between KBD-TKA and OA-TKA (P > 0.05), while compared with OA, KBD-TKA had significantly worse pre-operative ROM (75.48° vs. 82.87°), HSS score (36.40 vs. 41.84), and SF-36 (MCS) score (26.28 vs. 28.73) (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS score (1.13 vs. 1.16), ROM (105.79 vs. 105.79), and HSS score (92.06 vs. 92.25) between KBD-TKA and OA-TKA (P > 0.05), while compared with OA, KBD-TKA had significantly worse SF-36 (PCS) score (36.90 vs. 42.00) and SF-36 (MCS) score (55.16 vs. 59.70) (P < 0.05). In a multivariate regression, controlling for multiple potential confounders, diagnosis of KBD was associated with poor quality of life after surgery, whereas pre-operative pain was specifically associated with post-operative pain. However, preoperative gender, age, BMI, and the angles of knee prosthesis (before and after surgery) were not associated with post-operative outcome. CONCLUSION: Patients with KBD undergoing primary TKA have excellent outcomes, comparable with OA at the final follow-up, in spite of worse pre-operative ROM, HSS score, and SF-36(MCS) score. However, KBD patients are worse than OA in terms of general health. Pre-operative age, gender, BMI, and the angles of knee prosthesis were not the factors influencing the clinical efficacy of TKA. The diagnosis of KBD was an independent risk factor for poor quality of life after TKA. Pre-operative pain was a clinically important predictor of outcome.

Same-Day Primary Care Referral Versus Usual Care for Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Seen in a Preoperative Clinic.

Background While several studies have suggested that anesthesia and surgical care episodes provide an opportunity to improve the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, few studies have implemented and tested pragmatic care coordination efforts for this population. The present study aimed to examine the effects of same-day primary care referral vs. usual care on outpatient hypertension treatment among patients with elevated preoperative clinic blood pressure (BP). Methodology With institutional review board approval of the project as a quality improvement (QI) initiative not requiring consent, we conducted a prospective QI project comparing same-day preoperative primary care referral vs. usual care within comparable cohorts of US Veterans presenting to a preoperative evaluation clinic with elevated BP for whom treatment assignment was based on prior primary care clinic affiliation. Outpatient BP, antihypertensive medications, and antihypertensive dosages at the initial visit and for one year after the initial preoperative clinic visit were followed in the electronic health record. Results Between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019, one of the two on-site primary care groups (Firm A) at our facility agreed to accommodate same-day BP referrals. Patients in the second primary care group received standard preoperative care (Firm B). Charts for the pseudo-randomized cohort of Firm A and B patients were compared after 12 months to assess for changes in BP and hypertension treatment. Firm A and B patients were similar in demographics. Overall, 68 (91%) Firm A patients were correctly referred for primary care appointments. Moreover, 28 of 68 (41.2%) patients adhered to the same-day referral recommendation, with the remainder declining to attend the primary care visit. BPs were similar between Firm A and Firm B groups at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-intervention. Firm A adherent patients (i.e., those attending the referral) received hypertension treatment intensification sooner than Firm A non-adherent and Firm B patients (median (interquartile range) days to intensification = 21 (0.5-103.5) vs. 154 (45.5-239) and 170 (48-220), respectively; p = 0.038 and p = 0.048, respectively). Conclusions Our protocol achieved a high degree of same-day primary care referral (91%) in hypertensive patients presenting at the preoperative clinic. Although this limited study did not demonstrate improved BP control in patients who received same-day primary care, this group did show increased rates of rapid treatment intensification which may infer improved long-term health outcomes. Further work examining logistical barriers to patients attending same-day referrals is warranted.

Feasibility of a randomized hypertension screening initiative in the perioperative setting.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess feasibility of a randomized trial of blood pressure intervention (home blood pressure monitoring vs. counseling) in the preoperative clinic and the baseline rates of primary care follow-up after such interventions. METHODS: A prospective randomized feasibility study was performed at Yale New Haven Hospital Preadmission Testing Clinic. A sample of 100 adults, with elevated blood pressure, were recruited during their preadmission visit, and randomized 1:1 to receive brief BP counseling and an educational brochure versus additionally receiving a home BP monitor (HBPM) with a mailed report of their home readings. At 60-day post-surgery telephone follow-up, investigators asked whether participants had primary-care follow-up; had new/adjusted hypertension treatment; and felt satisfied with the study. RESULTS: There were 51 patients in the counseling group and 49 in the HBPM group. Of 46 patients in the HBPM group who returned their monitors, 36 (78%) were hypertensive at home. At 60 days post-surgery, 31 (61%) patients in the counseling group and 30 (61%) in the HBPM group were reached by telephone with the remaining followed by EHR. Thirty-six (71%) patients in the counseling group and 36 (73%) in the HBPM group had seen their primary care provider. Seventeen of 36 (47%) in the counseling group and 18 of 31 (58%) in the HBPM group received new or adjusted hypertension medications. Sixty-one participants answered questions regarding their satisfaction with the study with 52 (85%) reporting that they felt moderately to very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study suggests that interventional blood pressure trials in the preoperative clinic are feasible, but telephone follow-up leads to significant gaps in outcome ascertainment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03634813 . Registered 16 of August 2018.

Underuse of statins for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events among ambulatory surgical patients.

Although statins are highly effective for reducing cardiovascular disease events, prior studies demonstrate their significant underuse in the US population, including among those with known atherosclerotic disease. It is unknown whether this finding applies to the subset of patients who present for outpatient surgery, as such patients would be expected to have recent exposures to healthcare providers during the preoperative referral period. The primary aim of this manuscript was to ascertain the prevalence of statin underuse and associated risk-factors for such underuse among ambulatory surgical patients with documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This was a retrospective observational study of a random sample of 600 patients ages 40-75 years presenting for ambulatory surgery within a 6-month period in 2016, at one of three ambulatory surgical centers affiliated with a large, tertiary care hospital. Compilation and analysis of data occurred in 2018-2019. Of the 600 subjects, 117 (19.5%) had documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Within this high-risk group, only 71 (60.7%) carried a prescription for any statin, and only 30 (25.6%) were prescribed a recommended high intensity statin dose for secondary prevention. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age, male sex, and treatment for hypertension were positively associated with statin use. In conclusion, statin underuse among ambulatory surgical patients is common and mirrors what has been observed in non-surgical populations. Future trials are needed to investigate the possible role of surgical teams to promote guideline-based statin therapy, including the role of preoperative screening interventions to impact long term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Elevated preoperative blood pressures in adult surgical patients are highly predictive of elevated home blood pressures.

Blood pressure (BP) measurement during the presurgical assessment has been suggested as a way to improve longitudinal detection and treatment of hypertension. The relationship between BP measured during this assessment and home blood pressure (HBP), a better indicator of hypertension, is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to determine the positive predictive value of presurgical BP for predicting elevated HBP. We prospectively enrolled 200 patients at a presurgical evaluation clinic with clinic blood pressures (CBPs) ≥130/85 mm Hg, as measured using a previously validated automated upper-arm device (Welch Allyn Vital Sign Monitor 6000 Series), to undergo daily HBP monitoring (Omron Model BP742N) between the index clinic visit and their day of surgery. Elevated HBP was defined, per American Heart Association guidelines, as mean systolic HBP ≥135 mm Hg or mean diastolic HBP ≥85 mm Hg. Of the 200 participants, 188 (94%) returned their home blood pressure monitors with valid data. The median number of HBP recordings was 10 (interquartile range, 7-14). Presurgical CBP thresholds of 140/90, 150/95, and 160/100 mm Hg yielded positive predictive values (95% confidence interval) for elevated HBP of 84.1% (0.78-0.89), 87.5% (0.81-0.92), and 94.6% (0.87-0.99), respectively. In contrast, self-reported BP control, antihypertensive treatment, availability of primary care, and preoperative pain scores demonstrated poor agreement with elevated HBP. Elevated preoperative CBP is highly predictive of longitudinally elevated HBP. BP measurement during presurgical assessment may provide a way to improve longitudinal detection and treatment of hypertension.

[Percutaneous reduction and Kirschner pin flxation through sinus tarsi approach for the treatment of Sanders type III calcaneal fracture].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical effect of percutaneous reduction and Kirschner pin flxation through sinus tarsi approach in treating Sanders type III calcaneal fracture. METHODS: Totally 22 patients (22 feet) with Sanders III calcaneal fracture were treated with percutaneous reduction and Kirschner pin flxation through sinus tarsi approach form September 2013 to December 2015. Among them, including 18 males and 4 females; aged from 20 to 65 years old with an average of (41.73±12.46) years old. Böhler angle, Gissane angle and calcaneal width before and after operation were observed and compared, Maryland scoring system was used to evaluate curative effect; postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: All patients were followed up from 18 to 36 months with an average of (27.05±4.92) months. All fractures healed well with an average of (10.73±1.24) weeks. Böhler angle before operation (11.36±5.92) improved to (33.36±3.99) after operation, and had significant differences(P<0.05); there was significant difference of Gissane angle between preoperation (99.23±8.61) and postoperation (114.64±6.93); calcaneal width was improved from (46.59±1.40) mm before operation to (42.15±0.75) mm at 3 months after operation (P<0.05). Maryland score was (95.05±6.86) points, 16 patients obtained excellent results, 5 patients moderate, and 1 patient poor. No inflammation, flap margin necrosis and osteomyelitis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional internal fixation through L-shape incision, percutaneous reduction and Kirschner pin flxation through sinus tarsi approach in treating Sanders type III calcaneal fracture obtained satisfied clinical effects, and has advantages of invasive trauma, simple operation, easy to remove and less complication. Meanwhile, careful operation and identification should be done during sinus tarsi approach operation to protect sural nerve and tendon.

Variation in surgical quality measure adherence within hospital referral regions: do publicly reported surgical quality measures distinguish among hospitals that patients are likely to compare?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical quality measures that Medicare publicly reports provide a basis for patients to choose a hospital from within their geographic region. DATA SOURCE: The Department of Health and Human Services' public reporting website, http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare. STUDY DESIGN: We identified hospitals (n = 2,953) reporting adherence rates to the quality measures intended to reduce surgical site infections (Surgical Care Improvement Project, 1-3) in 2012. We defined regions within which patients were likely to compare hospitals using the hospital referral regions (HRRs) from the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care Project. We described distributions of reported SCIP adherence within each HRR, including medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), skewness, and outliers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ninety-seven percent of HRRs had median SCIP-1 scores ≥95 percent. In 93 percent of HRRs, half of the hospitals in the HRR were within 5 percent of the median hospital's score. In 62 percent of HRRs, hospitals were skewed toward the higher rates (negative skewness). Seven percent of HRRs demonstrated positive skewness. Only 1 percent had a positive outlier. SCIP-2 and SCIP-3 demonstrated similar distributions. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly reported quality measures for surgical site infection prevention do not distinguish the majority of hospitals that patients are likely to choose from when selecting a surgical provider. More studies are needed to improve public reporting's ability to positively impact patient decision making.

Treatment strategies for mass burn casualties.

BACKGROUND: Mass burn casualties are always a great challenge to a medical team because a large number of seriously injured patients were sent in within a short time. Usually a high mortality is impending. Experiences gained from successful treatment of the victims may be useful in guiding the care of mass casualties in an armed conflict. METHODS: Thirty-five burn victims in a single batch, being transferred nonstop by air and highway from a distant province, were admitted 48 hours post-injury. All patients were male with a mean age of (22.4 +/- 8.7) years. The burn extent ranged from 4% to 75% ((13.6 +/- 12.9)%) total body surface area. Among them, thirty-two patients were complicated by moderate and severe inhalation injury, and tracheostomy had been performed in 15 patients. Decompression incisions of burn eschar on extremities were done in 17 cases before transportation. All the thirty-five patients arrived at the destination smoothly via 4-hour airlift and road transportation. Among them, twenty-five patients were in critical condition. RESULTS: These thirty-five patients were evacuated 6 hours from the scene of the injury, and they were transferred to a local hospital for primary emergency care. The patients were in very poor condition when admitted to our hospital because of the severe injury with delayed and inadequate treatment. Examination of these patients at admission showed that one patient was suffering from sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Dysfunction of the heart, lung, liver, kidney, and coagulation were all found in the patients. Forty-eight operations were performed in the 23 patients during one month together with comprehensive treatment, and the function of various organs was ameliorated after appropriate treatment. All the 35 patients survived. CONCLUSIONS: A well-organized team consisting of several cooperative groups with specified duties is very important. As a whole, the treatment protocol should be individualized, basing on the extent of the injury and the care that the patient had received at the spot. During airlift, the stretchers should be arranged perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the cabin. The treatment protocol in our hospital consisted mainly of prompt effective relief of all life-threatening complications, followed by early closure of burn wounds, appropriate use of anti-infection therapy, emphasis on nutritional support, correction of metabolic disorders, alleviation of immunosuppression, correction of coagulopathy, and effective support and protection of organ function.