Programs and processes for advancing pediatric acute kidney support therapy in hospitalized and critically ill children: a report from the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) consensus conference.

Pediatric acute kidney support therapy (paKST) programs aim to reliably provide safe, effective, and timely extracorporeal supportive care for acutely and critically ill pediatric patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), fluid and electrolyte derangements, and/or toxin accumulation with a goal of improving both hospital-based and lifelong outcomes. Little is known about optimal ways to configure paKST teams and programs, pediatric-specific aspects of delivering high-quality paKST, strategies for transitioning from acute continuous modes of paKST to facilitate rehabilitation, or providing effective short- and long-term follow-up. As part of the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative Conference, the first to focus on a pediatric population, we summarize here the current state of knowledge in paKST programs and technology, identify key knowledge gaps in the field, and propose a framework for current best practices and future research in paKST.

Pediatric AKI in the real world: changing outcomes through education and advocacy-a report from the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) consensus conference.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality across the life course, yet care for AKI remains mostly supportive. Raising awareness of this life-threatening clinical syndrome through education and advocacy efforts is the key to improving patient outcomes. Here, we describe the unique roles education and advocacy play in the care of children with AKI, discuss the importance of customizing educational outreach efforts to individual groups and contexts, and highlight the opportunities created through innovations and partnerships to optimize lifelong health outcomes. METHODS: During the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) consensus conference, a multidisciplinary group of experts discussed the evidence and used a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus on recommendations on AKI research, education, practice, and advocacy in children. RESULTS: The consensus statements developed in response to three critical questions about the role of education and advocacy in pediatric AKI care are presented here along with a summary of available evidence and recommendations for both clinical care and research. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus statements emphasize that high-quality care for patients with AKI begins in the community with education and awareness campaigns to identify those at risk for AKI. Education is the key across all healthcare and non-healthcare settings to enhance early diagnosis and develop mitigation strategies, thereby improving outcomes for children with AKI. Strong advocacy efforts are essential for implementing these programs and building critical collaborations across all stakeholders and settings.

The impact of transfers from neonatal intensive care to paediatric intensive care.

OBJECTIVES: Infants receiving care from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can develop chronic problems and be transferred to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for on-going care. There is concern that such infants may take up a large amount of PICU resource, but this is not evidence based. We determined the impact of such transfers. METHODS: We reviewed 10 years of NICU admissions to two tertiary PICUs, which had approximately 12,000 admissions during that period. RESULTS: Sixty-seven infants, gestational age at birth 34.7 (IQR 27.1-38.8) weeks and postnatal age on transfer 81 (IQR 9-144) days were admitted from NICUs. The median (IQR) length of stay was 12 (4-41) days. The 19 infants born <28 weeks of gestation had a greater median length of stay (32, range IQR 10-93 days) than more mature born infants (7.5, IQR 4-26 days) (p=0.003). The median cost of PICU stay for NICU transfers was £23,800 (range 1,205-1,034,000) per baby. The total cost of care for infants transferred from NICUs was £6,457,955. CONCLUSIONS: Infants transferred from NICUs were a small proportion of PICU admissions but, particularly those born <28 weeks of gestation, had prolonged stays which needs to be considered when determining bed capacity.

A review on mobile phones as bacterial reservoirs in healthcare environments and potential device decontamination approaches.

Mobile communication devices (MCDs), including cell phones and smart phones, have become an essential part of everyday life. Despite their frequent usage, most people, even healthcare personnel, often ignore the possibility that these devices might accumulate to carry a variety of microbial flora during and after the inspection of patients. The handling of MCDs with unwashed hands and/or their seldom cleaning can aggravate potential health risks. Many of the harbored bacteria species can be harmful to immune-suppressed patients for whom the disinfection precautions should be taken more seriously. In this review, we discuss the significance of maintaining the cleanliness of mobile devices, especially in healthcare settings, to prevent the spread of nosocomial infections in patients. Furthermore, we discuss strategies to address microbial contamination of MCDs to maintain good hand hygiene for the users of smartphones or other mobile communication devices. These techniques are capable of providing instant disinfection of the devices along with residual effects over prolonged periods.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.

OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN: A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS: The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS: The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 52 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 49 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS: A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.

Nintedanib vs pirfenidone in the management of COVID-19 lung fibrosis: A single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pneumonia is complicated with residual lung fibrosis, as evidenced by imaging and postmortem pathological findings. In addition to steroids, we compared the efficacy of nintedanib and pirfenidone in the management of COVID-19 lung fibrosis measured by CT severity score (CTSS). METHODS: All cases of COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosed as COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR having SpO2 ⩽ 96% and CTSS ⩾ 10 even after 15 days were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups. All three groups received steroids at a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight of prednisolone or equivalent. The first group received steroids alone, the second group received pirfenidone with steroids and the third group received nintedanib with steroids. All patients were followed up at 6 and 12 weeks. The primary endpoint of our study was to find out any improvement in CTSS. RESULTS: Out of 90 patients, 56 patients completed the study. Among three groups, 19 (33.9%) patients received steroids (control) only, 16 (28.6%) patients received steroids with pirfenidone and 21 (37.5%) patients received steroids with nintedanib. The study population had a mean (±SD) age of 52.5 ± 10.1 years, mean (±SD) C-reactive protein of 97.1 ± 102.2 mg/L (normal <6 mg/L), mean (±SD) serum ferritin 459.4 ± 305.5 ng/mL (normal <250 ng/mL), mean (±SD) serum d-dimer level 2.1 ± 2.6 µg/mL (normal <0.5 µg/mL) and mean (±SD) CTSS of 16.9 ± 4.3. There was significant improvement in CTSS in group receiving nintedanib compared to pirfenidone at 12 weeks (3.67 ± 1.21 vs 9.07 ± 1.12) with a p-value <0.01. CONCLUSION: Along with steroids in the treatment of COVID-19 lung fibrosis, there was a significant improvement in lung CTSS with nintedanib compared to pirfenidone.