Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 50(7): 505-9, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26311640

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with oral or vaginal misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation. METHODS: This was a randomized, multi-center, open clinical trial. A total of 625 women at 8-16 weeks of gestation were randomized to receive 200 mg oral mifepristone followed by either oral misoprostol 400 µg every 3 hours or vaginal misoprostol 400 µg every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses 36-48 hours later. There were 417 women in oral group with 198 at 8-9 weeks and 219 at 10-16 weeks, while 208 women in vaginal group with 99 at 8-9 weeks and 109 at 10-16 weeks. The outcome measures were the success abortion rate, induction to abortion interval, the amount of bleeding, reoccurrence of menstruation and adverse events. RESULTS: Abortion rate was significantly higher in vaginal group [98.1% (202/206)] than that in oral group [94.0% (390/415), P = 0.023]; concerning termination of pregnancy at 8-9 weeks and 10-16 weeks respectively, there were no significant differences between oral and vaginal groups (P = 0.156, P = 0.073). The induction to abortion interval was no significant difference in oral and vaginal group in different gestational weeks (P = 0.238, P = 0.273). The average induction to abortion interval was (4.1 ± 6.6) hours and (6.0 ± 4.5) hours respectively in terminating 8-9 weeks and 10-16 weeks of gestation. Concerning the amount of bleeding within 2 hours of placenta expulsion, there was significant difference between oral group [(63 ± 46) ml] and vaginal group [(55 ± 45) ml] in terminating 8-9 weeks of gestation (P = 0.047), while there was no significant difference between groups in terminating 10-16 weeks of gestation [oral group (76 ± 52) ml versus vaginal group (76 ± 61) ml, P = 0.507]. The reoccurrence of menstruation was about 37 days in both oral and vaginal groups. Two cases of incomplete abortion were serious adverse events (SAE) relating to treatment. The common adverse events (AE) of nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in oral group [57.2% (239/417), 36.3% (151/417)] than those in vaginal group [45.4% (94/208), 26.1% (54/208); P = 0.005, 0.011]. CONCLUSION: Oral or vaginal misoprostol combined with mifepristone, is effective and safe for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Mifepristona/efeitos adversos , Misoprostol/efeitos adversos , Abortivos não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aborto Induzido , Administração Intravaginal , Administração Oral , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Mifepristona/administração & dosagem , Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 687, 2021 Nov 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34809649

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects between computer-assisted and traditional cannulated screw internal fixation on treating femoral neck fracture. METHODS: The search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database from the beginning to August 2020. RevMan5.4 software, which was provided by the International Cochrane Group, was used for the meta-analysis comparing the differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, total drilling times, Harris score, fracture healing rate, and femoral head necrosis rate between computer-assisted and traditional methods groups. RESULTS: A total of 1028 patients were included in 16 studies. Primary outcome indicators: Compared with the traditional method group, the computer-assisted group had less operative time (2RCTs, P < 0.00001; 8 non-RCTs, P = 0.009; Overall, P < 0.00001), intraoperative bleeding (1 RCTs, P < 0.00001; 9non-RCTs, P < 0.00001; Overall, P < 0.00001), femoral head necrosis rate (1 RCT, P = 0.11;7 non-RCTs, P = 0.09; Overall, P = 0.02) and higher Harris scores (1 RCT, P < 0.0001; 9 non-RCTs, P = 0.0002; Overall, P < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in fracture healing rate between the two groups (5 non-RCTs, P = 0.17). Secondary outcomes indicators: The computer-assisted group had a lower frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and total number of drills compared with the traditional method group, while there was no significant difference in fracture healing time. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional hollow screw internal fixation on the treatment of femoral neck fracture, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can shorten the operation time and improve the operation efficiency and reduce the X-ray injury of medical staff and help patients obtain a better prognosis. Therefore, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation is a better choice for the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Study registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42020214493.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Parafusos Ósseos , Computadores , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 18(5): 441-444, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28471117

RESUMO

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), a leading cause of maternal mortality, can occur within 24 h of delivery (primary PPH), or during the period from 24 h after delivery to Week 6 of puerperium (secondary PPH). It requires health professionals to be alert to the symptoms to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment, especially in the case of rupture of a uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (UAP) due to its life-threatening consequence (Baba et al., 2014). Most of the published case reports or case serials describe UAP as a possible cause of delayed PPH after traumatic procedures during delivery or pregnancy termination, including cesarean section (CS), manual removal of the placenta, or dilation and curettage (D&C) (Wald, 2003). Herein, we report a case of prior CS-related UAP manifesting as primary PPH after an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. This case required emergency embolization and is notable for several reasons. Antepartum hemorrhage of the previously scarred uterus was a potential sign of the ruptured UAP, and color Doppler sonography sometimes deceived the physician as the characteristic features of UAP did not appear to be present.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Artéria Uterina , Adulto , Falso Aneurisma/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA