Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Virol ; 93(10): 5833-5838, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076901

RESUMO

Researchers around the world are working at record speed to find the best ways to treat and prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of hospitalized mild to moderate COVID-19 infected patients. This was a randomized open-label controlled study that included 164 patients with COVID-19. Patients were randomized into two groups where Group 1 (Ivermectin group) included patients who received ivermectin 12 mg once daily for 3 days with standard care and Group 2 (control group) included patients who received standard protocol of treatment alone for 14 days. The main outcomes were mortality, the length of hospital stay, and the need for mechanical ventilation. All patients were followed up for 1 month. Overall, 82 individuals were randomized to receive ivermectin plus standard of care and 82 to receive standard of care alone. Patients in the ivermectin group had a shorter length of hospital stay (8.82 ± 4.94 days) than the control group (10.97 ± 5.28 days), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.085). Three patients (3.7%) in each group required mechanical ventilation (p = 1.00). The death rate was three patients in the ivermectin group (3.7%) versus four patients (4.9%) in the control group without any significant difference between the two groups (p = 1.00). Although there was no statistically significant difference in any endpoints by ivermectin doses (12 mg/day for 3 days); there was an observed trend to reducing hospital stay in the ivermectin-treated group.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , Egito/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Virol ; 166(3): 949-954, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492523

RESUMO

No specific antiviral drugs have been approved for the treatment of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19. This was a multicenter randomized controlled study including 96 patients with COVID- 19 who were randomly assigned into a chloroquine (CQ) group and a favipiravir group. None of the patients in the favipiravir group needed mechanical ventilation (p = 0.129). One patient (2.3%) in the favipiravir group and two patients (4.2%) in the CQ group died (p = 1.00). Favipiravir is a promising drug for COVID-19 that decreases the hospital stay and the need for mechanical ventilation.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04351295.


Assuntos
Amidas/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33208083

RESUMO

In late 2019, SARS-COV-2 disease was firstly discovered in Wuhan, China and then it infected millions of people worldwide. Later, the World Health Organization (WHO) described COVID-19 as the first pandemic invading the world in the 21st century. The WHO has declared that the emerging infection will last long enough to force adjustments not only in people's lifestyles but also in the health care system. This amendment is expected to spread through many medical practices and specialties. A lot of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have been proposed for COVID-19 management. The best strategy for the management of patients requires a multi-disciplinary team approach with correct decisions regarding the right timing of each modality of treatment. The participating multidisciplinary team for COVID-19 management includes six infectious diseases experts in Tanta University; one critical care management expert, an emergency medicine expert and two pharmacists in Tanta University. In this review, we reported our multi-disciplinary team experience with up to date literature guidance to propose a valid protocol for the management of COVID-19 patients in a limited resources setting.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/métodos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Países em Desenvolvimento , Gerenciamento Clínico , Recursos em Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Egito/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA