The impact of a modified carbohydrate formula, and its constituents, on glycaemic control and inflammatory markers: A nested mechanistic sub-study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia occurs frequently in the critically ill. Dietary intake of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), specifically Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), may exacerbate hyperglycaemia through perturbation of insulin sensitivity. The present study aimed to determine whether the use of nutritional formulae, with varying AGE loads, affects the amount of insulin administered and inflammation. METHODS: Exclusively tube fed patients (n = 35) were randomised to receive Nutrison Protein Plus Multifibre®, Diason® or Glucerna Select®. Insulin administration was standardised according to protocol based on blood glucose (<10 mmol L-1 ). Samples were obtained at randomisation and 48 h later. AGEs in nutritional formula, plasma and urine were measured using mass spectrometry. Plasma inflammatory markers were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and multiplex bead-based assays. RESULTS: AGE concentrations of CML in nutritional formulae were greatest with delivery of Nutrison Protein Plus® (mean [SD]; 6335 pmol mol-1 [2436]) compared to Diason® (4836 pmol mol-1 [1849]) and Glucerna Select® (4493 pmol mol-1 [1829 pmol mol-1 ]) despite patients receiving similar amounts of energy (median [interquartile range]; 12 MJ [8.2-13.7 MJ], 11.5 MJ [8.3-14.5 MJ], 11.5 MJ [8.3-14.5 MJ]). More insulin was administered with Nutrison Protein Plus® (2.47 units h-1 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.57-3.37 units h-1 ]) compared to Diason® (1.06 units h-1 [95% CI = 0.24-1.89 units h-1 ]) or Glucerna Select® (1.11 units h-1 [95% CI = 0.25-1.97 units h-1 ]; p = 0.04). Blood glucose concentrations were similar. There were associations between greater insulin administration and reductions in circulating interleukin-6 (r = -0.46, p < 0.01), tumour necrosis factor-α (r = -0.44, p < 0.05), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (r = -0.42, p < 0.05) and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (r = -0.45, p < 0.01) concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of greater AGE load in nutritional formula potentially increases the amount of insulin required to maintain blood glucose within a normal range during critical illness. There was an inverse relationship between exogenous insulin and plasma inflammatory markers.

Interactions between advanced glycation end-products (AGE) and their receptors in the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy - are these receptors valid therapeutic targets.

Diabetes, is a metabolic disorder characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, microalbuminuria and inflammation. Moreover, there are a number of complications associated with this condition including retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy. Diabetic nephropathy, is the major cause of end-stage renal disease in Western societies affecting a substantial proportion (25-40%) of patients with diabetes. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) have been identified as important modulators of the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy, through both receptor dependant and independent interactions. AGEs elicit their receptor mediated effects via their engagement with numerous receptors and binding proteins which are broadly thought to be either inflammatory (RAGE and AGE-R2) or clearance receptors (AGE-R1, AGE-R3, CD36, Scr-II, FEEL-1 and FEEL-2). Modulation of AGE receptor expression is an important potential therapeutic approach worth consideration as a treatment for diabetic nephropathy and likely applicable to other vascular complications.

Advanced glycation end products and diabetic nephropathy.

Chronic hyperglycemia and oxidative stress in diabetes results in the formation and accumulation advanced glycation end products (AGEs). AGEs have a wide range of chemical, cellular, and tissue effects that contribute to the development of microvascular complications. In particular, AGEs appear to have a key role in the diabetic nephropathy. Their importance as downstream mediators of tissue injury in diabetic kidney disease is demonstrated by animal studies using inhibitors of advanced glycation to retard the development of nephropathy without directly influencing glycemic control. AGE modification of proteins may produce in changes charge, solubility, and conformation leading to molecular dysfunction as well as disrupting interactions with other proteins. AGEs also interact with specific receptors and binding proteins to influence the renal expression of growth factors and cytokines, implicated in the progression of diabetic renal disease. The effects of AGEs appears to be synergistic with other pathogenic pathways in diabetes including oxidative stress, hypertension, and activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Each of these pathways may be activated by AGEs, and each may promote the formation of AGEs in the vicious cycle associated with progressive renal damage. It is likely that therapies that inhibit the formation of AGEs or remove established AGE modifications will form an important component part of future therapy in patients with diabetes, acting in concert with conventional approaches to prevent diabetic renal injury.