Role of ethnicity/language in documented rates of pediatric asthma prescription refills.

OBJECTIVE: Medication maintenance is critical in the management of asthma. We investigated the differences in electronic health record (EHR) documentation of medication refills for Spanish- and English-speaking Latino children and non-Hispanic white children by examining rates of albuterol rescue inhaler refills from 2005 to 2017, and and inhaled corticosteroid refills from 2015 to 2017 in a multi-state network of community health centers (CHCs). METHODS: We used data from the ADVANCE network of CHCs. Our sample consisted of children aged 3-17, with a diagnosis of asthma and either albuterol or inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions (n = 39,162; n = 4,738 children, respectively). Negative binomial regression was used to calculate rates of refills per prescription adjusted for relevant patient-level covariates. Analyses stratified by asthma severity were also conducted. RESULTS: English-speaking Latino children had lower rates of albuterol refills compared with non-Hispanic white children (rate ratio [RR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.98), a trend that persisted among children with moderate/severe persistent asthma severity (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95). Spanish-speaking Latino and non-Hispanic white children had similar albuterol refills. Inhaled corticosteroid refill rates were comparable between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a multi-state network, these findings suggest that CHCs deliver equitable asthma care related to prescription refills between their Latino and white patients, but there is still opportunity for providers to ensure that their English-speaking Latino patients have access to necessary emergency asthma medication.

Latino-white disparities in ICD-coded asthma diagnosis among US children.

INTRODUCTION: It is uncertain if disparities in asthma diagnosis between Latino and non-Hispanic white children stem from differences in diagnosis over time among children presenting with similar clinical scenarios suggestive of asthma. METHODS: We evaluated the odds of International Classification of Disease (ICD)-coded asthma diagnosis in Latino (English and Spanish preferring) and non-Hispanic white children, overall (N = 524,456) and among those presenting with possible asthma indicators (N = 85,516) over a 13-year period, using electronic health record data from a multi-state network of community health centers. RESULTS: Among those with possible asthma indicators, Spanish-preferring Latinos had lower adjusted odds of ICD-coded asthma diagnosis compared to non-Hispanic whites (OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.77-0.99); English-preferring Latinos did not differ from non-Hispanic whites. Differences in ICD-coded diagnosis between ethnicity/language groups varied by presenting symptom. CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-preferring Latino children may be less-likely to have ICD-coded asthma documented in the EHR when presenting with certain clinical indicators suggestive of asthma. Clinicians should be cognizant of the need for the follow-up of these indicators in Spanish-preferring Latino children.

Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research: interventions targeting social needs in pediatric clinical care.

The social determinants of health (SDoH) are defined by the World Health Organization as the "conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age." Within pediatrics, studies have highlighted links between these underlying social, economic, and environmental conditions, and a range of health outcomes related to both acute and chronic disease. Additionally, within the adult literature, multiple studies have shown significant links between social problems experienced during childhood and "adult diseases" such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A variety of potential mechanisms for such links have been explored including differential access to care, exposure to carcinogens and pathogens, health-affecting behaviors, and physiologic responses to allostatic load (i.e., toxic stress). This robust literature supports the importance of the SDoH and the development and evaluation of social needs interventions. These interventions are also driven by evolving economic realities, most importantly, the shift from fee-for-service to value-based payment models. This article reviews existing evidence regarding pediatric-focused clinical interventions that address the SDoH, those that target basic needs such as food insecurity, housing insecurity, and diminished access to care. The paper summarizes common challenges encountered in the evaluation of such interventions. Finally, the paper concludes by introducing key opportunities for future inquiry.

Pediatric High Blood Pressure Follow-Up Guideline Adherence in a Massachusetts Health Care System.

OBJECTIVES: To describe adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) 2017 clinical practice guidelines for follow-up after high blood pressure (BP) screening by pediatric and family medicine providers in a Massachusetts health care system and to assess differences in receipt of follow-up according to child- and clinic-level factors. METHODS: Electronic health record data were analyzed for children aged 3 to 17years who had an outpatient primary care visit during 2018 with a high BP screening (according to AAP guidelines). We classified AAP guideline adherent follow-up as BP follow-up within 6months after an elevated finding (+2-week buffer) and within 2weeks after a hypertensive finding (+2-week buffer). Differences in receipt of guideline adherent follow-up by child- and clinic-level factors were assessed via multilevel mixed effects logistic regression models. RESULTS: The median age of the 4563 included children was 12years and 43% were female. Overall, guideline adherent follow-up was received by 17.7% of children within the recommended time interval; 27.4% for those whose index BP was elevated and 5.4% for those whose index BP was hypertensive. Modeling revealed older children and those belonging to clinics with more providers, smaller patient panels, and smaller proportion of Medicaid patients were more likely to receive adherent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Few children received guideline adherent BP follow-up and most differences in adherence were related to clinic resources. System-level interventions are needed to improve BP follow-up.

Evaluating the Impact of a Pediatric Inpatient Social Care Program in a Community Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of implementing a stakeholder-informed social risk screening and social service referral system in a community hospital setting. METHODS: We implemented a stakeholder-informed social care program at a community hospital in April 2022. The evaluation included patients aged 0 to 17 years admitted to the pediatric unit between April 2021 and March 2022 (1 year preimplementation) and between April 2022 and March 2023 (1 year postimplementation). For a random subset of 232 preimplementation and 218 postimplementation patients, we performed manual data extraction, documenting program process measures and preliminary effectiveness outcomes. We used χ square and Wilcoxon rank tests to compare outcomes between the preimplementation and postimplementation groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the preliminary effectiveness of the social care program in identifying social risks. RESULTS: Screening rates were higher in the postimplementation group for nearly all social domains. Compared with preimplementation, the postimplementation group had higher rates of social risks identified (17.4% vs 7.8% [P < .01]: adjusted odds ratio 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.5-5.5]) on multivariate testing. Social work consults were completed more frequently and earlier for the postimplementation group (13.8.% vs 5.6% [P < .01]) and median (19 hours vs 25 hours [P = .03]), respectively. Rates of communication of social risks in discharge summaries were higher in the postimplementation group (46.8% vs 8.2% [P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a stakeholder-informed social care program within a community hospital setting led to the increased identification of social risks and social work consultations and improved timeliness of social work consultations and written communication of social risks in discharge summaries for primary care providers.

A Social Care System Implemented in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster RCT.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the implementation and effectiveness of the augmented WE CARE social care system on low-income children's health care utilization and child maltreatment outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized controlled trial at 6 community health centers. Full-term infants were followed from birth to age 3. The 3 experimental clinics implemented the augmented WE CARE system at well-child visits, consisting of a self-report screening instrument for 7 basic needs; an electronic health record-generated resource information referral system; and access to a peer patient navigator. Families at control community health centers received usual care; 1 control site was contaminated and removed from primary analysis. We analyzed results using generalized mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Overall, 878 children were followed until age 3. Implementation of WE CARE was poor with only 28.9% of visits having a WE CARE screener documented. WE CARE families received significantly more resource referrals than control families (43.1% vs 1.9%, adjusted odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-5.6); 20% were referred to the patient navigator. WE CARE children had significantly higher immunization adherence ratios. Although there were no statistically significant differences with well-child visits, WE CARE children had higher rates of emergency department visits than control children. By age 3, WE CARE children had significantly higher hospitalization rates (14.1% vs 10.4%, adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.7). There were no statistically significant differences with maltreatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found poor implementation and mixed benefits for the augmented WE CARE system on immunization, health care utilization, and maltreatment outcomes in early childhood.

Food Insecurity Was Associated With Greater Family Health Care Expenditures In The US, 2016-17.

Food insecurity has been associated with the health care expenditures of individuals, but it can affect the entire family. Evaluating the relationship between food insecurity and family expenditures provides a better understanding of the financial implications of food insecurity interventions. Our primary objective was to evaluate the association between food insecurity in one year (2016) and family health care expenditures-for all members, for children only, and for adults only-in the next year (2017). We also evaluated whether this association varied across types of insurance coverage within families: all private, all public, or mixed (including uninsured). Using nationally representative data, we found that food-insecure families had 20 percent greater total health care expenditures than food-secure families, for an annual difference of $2,456. Food insecurity was associated with greater expenditures across all family insurance patterns, including the 19.1 percent of families with mixed coverage. Our findings suggest that in families with mixed coverage, positive impacts of food insecurity interventions on health care use may accrue to family members other than the targeted beneficiaries and those who have different insurance, benefiting the entire family but potentially discouraging investments on the part of any one payer.

Prioritizing Child Health: Promoting Adherence to Well-Child Visits in an Urban, Safety-Net Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: After discovering racial/ethnic disparities in adherence to well-child visits, UMass Memorial Health worked to identify and mitigate barriers to adherence for patients and families across 53 primary care practices in central Massachusetts. METHODS: When the systemwide goal to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in well-child visit adherence was established, a multidisciplinary team of leaders from UMass Memorial Health worked together to engage patients and stakeholders to identify obstacles to adherence. Transportation, language, and scheduling were identified as barriers. The team employed a number of countermeasures to address these barriers: A new workflow was created for requesting free curb-to-curb transportation for Medicaid patients, practices were provided with tip sheets for accessing interpreter services, and a protocol for scheduling appointment reminders was developed. In addition, the team leveraged robust data analytics to communicate real-time data to practices to keep them informed of their progress toward the system's health equity goal. Primary data results are reported from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. RESULTS: For patients who identified as Hispanic/Latinx, adherence rose from 64.3% at baseline to 74.1% (p < 0.001); and for patients who identified as Black/African American, adherence rose from 58.7% at baseline to 71.9% (p < 0.001). The gap in adherence to well-child visits for Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx children compared to White children narrowed (12.4 percentage points to 5.1; p < 0.001; 6.8 percentage points to 2.9; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Through a unique partnership between health system leaders, frontline staff, and the system's informatics team and by engaging caregivers to identify and address barriers to well-child visits, UMass Memorial Health was able to improve adherence to well-child visits among patients who identify as Black/African American or Hispanic/Latinx.

Changes in psychosocial functioning among urban, school-age children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: There is concern about the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychosocial functioning among school-age children, who have faced unusual stressors during this time. Our goal was to assess mental health symptoms and social risks during COVID-19, compared to before the pandemic, for urban, racial and ethnic minority school-age children, and investigate the relationship between mental health and social risks. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study from September 2019 until January 2021 of children age 5-11 years old recruited from an urban safety net hospital-based pediatric primary care practice. We measured emotional and behavioral symptoms (including attention, internalizing, and externalizing symptoms) before and during the pandemic with the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17). We measured social risks (including food and housing insecurity) before and during the pandemic with the THRIVE screener. We measured additional mid-pandemic COVID-related stressors with items on school participation, screens/media use, illness exposure, and caregiver mental health. We compared pre- and mid-pandemic PSC-17 symptom scores across 4 domains (total, attention, internalizing, and externalizing) and used path analysis to examine the relationship between mental health and social risks pre- and mid-pandemic. RESULTS: Caregivers of 168 children (54% non-Hispanic Black, 29% Hispanic, and 22% non-English speaking) completed the study. Children had significantly higher levels of emotional and behavioral symptoms midpandemic- vs. pre-pandemic in all domains. Significantly more children had a positive PSC-17 total score (18% vs. 8%, p < 0.01) and internalizing (depression and anxiety) score (18% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) during the pandemic vs. before, indicating clinical concerns in these areas. Caregivers reported significantly more social risks during vs. before the pandemic (p < 0.001). Mental health symptoms significantly correlated with number of social risks before the pandemic, but not during the pandemic. Less school assignment completion, increased screen time, and caregiver depression were all significantly associated with worse mid-pandemic mental health in children. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in depression/anxiety problems and social risks among urban, racial and ethnic minority school-age children compared to before the pandemic. More research is needed to understand if these changes will persist.

Asthma Care Quality, Language, and Ethnicity in a Multi-State Network of Low-Income Children.

INTRODUCTION: Prior research has documented disparities in asthma outcomes between Latino children and non-Hispanic whites, but little research directly examines the care provided to Latino children over time in clinical settings. METHODS: We utilized an electronic health record-based dataset to study basic asthma care utilization (timely diagnosis documentation and medication prescription) between Latino (Spanish preferring and English preferring) and Non-Hispanic white children over a 13-year study period. RESULTS: In our study population (n = 37,614), Latino children were more likely to have Medicaid, be low income, and be obese than non-Hispanic white children. Latinos (Spanish preferring and English preferring) had lower odds than non-Hispanic whites of having their asthma recorded on their problem list on the first day the diagnosis was noted (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89 Spanish preferring; OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99 English preferring). Spanish-preferring Latinos had higher odds of ever receiving a prescription for albuterol (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.52), inhaled corticosteroids (OR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.09), or oral steroids (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.04) than non-Hispanic whites. Among those with any prescription, Spanish-preferring Latinos had higher rates of albuterol prescriptions compared with non-Hispanic whites (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.0; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: In a multi-state network of clinics, Latino children were less likely to have their asthma entered on their problem list the first day it was noted than non-Hispanic white children, but otherwise did not receive inferior care to non-Hispanic white children in other measures. Further research can examine other parts of the asthma care continuum to better understand asthma disparities.

Redesigning Health Care Practices to Address Childhood Poverty.

Child poverty in the United States is widespread and has serious negative effects on the health and well-being of children throughout their life course. Child health providers are considering ways to redesign their practices in order to mitigate the negative effects of poverty on children and support the efforts of families to lift themselves out of poverty. To do so, practices need to adopt effective methods to identify poverty-related social determinants of health and provide effective interventions to address them. Identification of needs can be accomplished with a variety of established screening tools. Interventions may include resource directories, best maintained in collaboration with local/regional public health, community, and/or professional organizations; programs embedded in the practice (eg, Reach Out and Read, Healthy Steps for Young Children, Medical-Legal Partnership, Health Leads); and collaboration with home visiting programs. Changes to health care financing are needed to support the delivery of these enhanced services, and active advocacy by child health providers continues to be important in effecting change. We highlight the ongoing work of the Health Care Delivery Subcommittee of the Academic Pediatric Association Task Force on Child Poverty in defining the ways in which child health care practice can be adapted to improve the approach to addressing child poverty.

The value of the medical home for children without special health care needs.

OBJECTIVE: Although the medical home is promoted by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Affordable Care Act, its impact on children without special health care needs is unknown. We examined whether the medical home is associated with beneficial health care utilization and health-promoting behaviors in this population. METHODS: This study was a secondary data analysis of the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health. Data were available for 70 007 children without special health care needs. We operationalized the medical home according to the National Survey of Children's Health design. Logistic regression for complex sample surveys was used to model each outcome with the medical home, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 58.1% of children without special health care needs had a medical home. The medical home was significantly associated with increased preventive care visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-1.43]), decreased outpatient sick visits (aOR: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.66-0.76), and decreased emergency department sick visits (aOR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.65-0.76]). It was associated with increased odds of "excellent/very good" child health according to parental assessment (aOR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.15-1.45) and health-promoting behaviors such as being read to daily (aOR: 1.46 [95% CI: 1.13-1.89]), reported helmet use (aOR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.03-1.34]), and decreased screen time (aOR: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.02-1.22]). CONCLUSIONS: For children without special health care needs, the medical home is associated with improved health care utilization patterns, better parental assessment of child health, and increased adherence with health-promoting behaviors. These findings support the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Affordable Care Act to extend the medical home to all children.