Use of intravenous tranexamic acid to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Total hip or knee arthroplasty is associated with significant blood loss. Techniques such as the use of antifibrinolytics or desmopressin, or normovolaemic haemodilution have been used to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. Tranexamic acid has been used to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirement for total hip and knee arthroplasty, with variable results. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether intravenous tranexamic acid, when compared with placebo, reduces blood loss and transfusion requirement in total hip and knee joint replacement surgery and whether it might increase the risk of thromboembolic complications. The literature search was based on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and information from the pharmaceutical company that produces tranexamic acid (Pharmacia-Upjohn). We identified 15 clinical trials and 12 were considered suitable for detailed data extraction. Tranexamic acid reduces the proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion (OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.09-0.26), total amount of blood loss (WMD 460 ml, 95% CI: 274-626 ml), and the total number of units of allogeneic blood transfused (WMD 0.85 unit, 95% CI: 0.36-1.33). Tranexamic acid does not increase the risk of thromboembolic complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, thrombotic cerebral vascular accident, or myocardial infarction (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.45-2.12). Intravenous tranexamic acid appears effective and safe in reducing allogeneic blood transfusion and blood loss in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

The use of intravenous atropine after a saline infusion in the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients.

UNLABELLED: We investigated the efficacy of IV atropine for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients. Seventy-five patients undergoing transurethral prostate or bladder surgery were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 25), atropine 5 microg/kg (small-dose atropine, n = 25) or atropine 10 microg/kg (large-dose atropine, n = 25) after the induction of spinal anesthesia. All the patients received an IV infusion of 10 mL/kg 0.9% normal saline over 10 min before the induction of anesthesia. The systolic blood pressure decreased in all three groups after spinal anesthesia. There was a significant increase in the mean heart rate in both atropine groups as compared to the placebo group (placebo group: 78 bpm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.6-78.5; small-dose atropine group: 86 bpm, 95% CI 83.9-88.8; large-dose atropine group: 97 bpm, 95% CI 94.5-100.3; P: = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the incidence of hypotension in patients who received atropine (placebo group: 76%, small-dose atropine group: 52%, large-dose atropine group: 40%, P: = 0.03). The mean dose of ephedrine required was significantly decreased in the atropine groups (placebo group: 12.2 mg [SD= 10.5], small-dose atropine group: 7.4 mg [SD= 10.0], large-dose atropine group: 5.4 mg [SD= 8.7 mg], P: = 0.048). The total amount of IV fluid and number of patients requiring metaraminol in addition to 30 mg of ephedrine were not significantly different among the three groups. Significant side effects, such as confusion, ST segment changes or angina were not detected in any of the patients. We conclude that IV atropine may be a useful supplement to the existing methods in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: IV atropine increases heart rate in a dose-dependent manner in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. It reduces the incidence of hypotension and the dose of ephedrine required. Small-dose atropine may be a useful supplement in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients.