Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Retina ; 44(2): 197-204, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37782954

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A previous study from our group demonstrated protective effects of the use of metformin in the odds of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This is a subgroup analysis in a cohort of patients with diabetes to assess the interaction of metformin and other medications in protecting diabetic patients against developing AMD. METHODS: This is a case-control analysis using data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. Patients were 55 years and older with newly diagnosed AMD and matched to controls. We performed multivariable conditional logistic regressions, which adjusted for known risk factors of AMD and tested multiple interaction effects between metformin and 1) insulin, 2) sulfonylureas, 3) glitazones, 4) meglitinides, and 5) statins. RESULTS: The authors identified 81,262 diabetic cases and 79,497 diabetic controls. Metformin, insulin, and sulfonylureas demonstrated independent protective effects against AMD development. Sulfonylureas in combination with metformin demonstrated further decreased odds of AMD development compared with metformin alone. The other medication group (exenatide, sitagliptin, and pramlintide) slightly increased the odds of developing AMD when taken alone, but the combination with metformin alleviated this effect. CONCLUSION: The authors believe that their results bring them one step closer to finding an optimal effective hypoglycemic regimen that also protects against AMD development in diabetic patients.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Degeneração Macular , Metformina , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Medicare , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Degeneração Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular/prevenção & controle , Degeneração Macular/induzido quimicamente
2.
Injury ; 52(7): 1766-1770, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33883074

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spica casting and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) are options for diaphyseal femur fractures in preschool-age children (ages 3-6 years). Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are only of moderate or limited strength, which may lead to variation in practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze the epidemiology of children undergoing these procedures in the United States. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System, a national database consisting of 49 children's hospitals, was queried for patients between the ages of 3 and 6 years undergoing spica casting or ESIN for a diaphyseal femur fracture between 2011 and 2017. Non-diaphyseal fractures, subjects with associated syndromes or neuromuscular disorders, and pathologic fractures were excluded. Census guidelines were used to categorize hospitals geographically into regions and divisions. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Analysis included 4059 subjects. Spica casting was performed in 2878 children (71%) and ESIN in 1181 (29%). The median age of those undergoing spica casting was 3.0 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1 year] compared to 5.0 years for ESIN (IQR 2 years; p<0.01). When adjusting for covariates in a multivariate model, each year of increasing age resulted in 4.4 times higher odds that ESIN would be performed (95% CI 4.0-4.8, p<0.01). Compared to the Northeast, a child in the Midwest had 3.6 times higher odds of undergoing ESIN rather than spica casting (95% CI 2.6-5.1, p<0.01). Age at time of ESIN was lowest in the Midwest and highest in the Northeast (4.8±1.0 versus 5.3±0.9 years; p<0.01). There was no variation in the ratio of spica casting to ESIN performed in this age group between 2011 and 2017, including after release of the 2015 CPG. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, there is substantial variation in the chosen treatment for diaphyseal femur fractures in preschool-age children. ESIN is more likely to be chosen for older children. It is also most likely to be performed in the Midwest and least likely in the Northeast. These findings may have implications in terms of cost and resource utilization and suggest the need for more clinical data to guide surgical indications.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Adolescente , Pinos Ortopédicos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur , Geografia , Humanos , Lactente , Tração , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA