Regressed coronary ostial stenosis in a young female with Takayasu arteritis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Takayasu arteritis is a rare systemic vasculitis, which affects the aorta and its major branches, especially in young females. Diagnosis and treatment for Takayasu arteritis with coronary stenosis are important to prevent fatal complications. Immunosuppressive treatment such as corticosteroid is a common treatment for this condition. However, the effects of immunosuppressive treatment on inflammatory coronary stenosis caused by Takayasu arteritis remains unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old female had chest oppression on effort and was referred to our hospital due to ST-segment depression in I, aVL, and V2-4 on electrocardiogram. Coronary angiography showed severe stenosis in the ostium of both the left main trunk and the right coronary artery. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed isolated inflammation of the aortic root. She was diagnosed with Takayasu arteritis and treated with combined immunosuppressive treatment with corticosteroid and tocilizumab, which decreased the FDG uptake in the aortic root. Four months after initiation of the immunosuppressive treatment, coronary angiography showed regression of the coronary ostial stenosis. Coronary artery bypass surgery was considered, but the patient rejected invasive revascularization for coronary artery disease. She did not have chest oppression or ST-segment depression after the immunosuppressive treatment. She had no cardiac events for 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: We described regressed coronary ostial stenosis in a young female patient with Takayasu arteritis. Immunosuppressive treatment might have a favorable effect on coronary ostial stenosis in Takayasu arteritis.

Impact of bleeding event for new cancer diagnosis in patients with antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a frequent event in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of bleeding in CAD patients with antiplatelet therapy for cancer diagnosis remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive 1565 CAD patients treated with antiplatelet therapy after PCI, without anticoagulation therapy, were enrolled. We aimed to investigate the relationships between bleeding events and the incidence of new cancer diagnosis. Among 1565 patients, 178 (11.3 %) experienced any bleeding events defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 1, 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and 75 (4.7 %) experienced minor bleeding events defined as BARC 1 or 2 bleeding, and 116 (7.4 %) were diagnosed with new cancer during a mean follow-up period of 1528 days. Among 178 patients with any bleeding and 75 patients with minor bleeding events, 20 (11.2 %) and 13 (17.3 %) were subsequently diagnosed with new cancer, respectively. The proportion of new cancer diagnosis was higher in patients with any bleeding and minor bleeding events than in those without bleeding events (3.3 versus 1.6 per 100 person-years, p < 0.001 and 6.2 versus 1.6 per 100 person-years, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that any bleeding and minor bleeding events were associated with higher rate of new cancer diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.27, p = 0.003 and HR 3.93, p < 0.001, respectively]. Additionally, any gastrointestinal bleeding and minor gastrointestinal bleeding events were associated with higher rate of new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (HR 8.67, p < 0.001 and HR 12.74, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In CAD patients with antiplatelet therapy after PCI, any bleeding and minor bleeding events were associated with subsequent new cancer diagnosis. Even minor bleeding events may be the first manifestation of underlying cancer during antiplatelet therapy after PCI.