Budd-Chiari Syndrome Associated With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Treated by Deceased-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) associated with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is very rare, and only a few reports have described its treatment. Furthermore, no report to date has described the performance of liver transplantation for the treatment of BCS associated with HES. We herein describe a 54-year-old man who underwent deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for treatment of BCS associated with HES. CASE: A 54-year-old man was found to have an increased eosinophil count during a medical check-up. After exclusion of hematopoietic neoplastic diseases and secondary eosinophilia, idiopathic hypereosinophilia was diagnosed. Oral prednisolone was administered to the patient, and his eosinophil count immediately decreased to a normal level. He had an uneventful course without complications for 11 months but then presented with bloating and malaise. Imaging studies including ultrasonography, enhanced computed tomography, and angiography revealed BCS associated with HES. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt failed because of complete obstruction of the hepatic veins. Therefore, the patient was introduced to our hospital for liver transplantation. DDLT was performed with venovenous bypass 1 month after the patient was placed on the DDLT waiting list. The explanted hepatic veins were completely occluded and organized. The patient's eosinophil count was maintained at a normal level with prednisolone treatment after DDLT. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation can be a treatment option for BCS associated with HES if neoplastic diseases and secondary eosinophilia have been excluded. Life-long oral steroid therapy is required to control HES even after liver transplantation.

Donor Selection and Prophylactic Strategy for Venous Thromboembolic Events in Living Donors of Liver Transplantation Based on Results of Thrombophilia Screening Tests.

BACKGROUND We reported a strategy of thrombophilia testing-guided venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis for living donors of liver transplantation in 2011. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this protocol for VTE prophylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thrombophilia testing, including protein S (PS), protein C (PC), antithrombin (AT) III, and anti-phospholipid antibody (APLA), was performed in 306 living donor candidates between July 2005 and June 2016. Donors who met any of the criteria of PS <60%, PC <64%, AT-III <70%, and positive APLA were classified into the borderline group and received continuous venous infusion of heparin immediately after surgery, in addition to use of elastic stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) until patients were ambulatory. Other donors who were classified into the normal group used elastic stockings and IPC with no anticoagulants. The efficacy and safety endpoints were VTE occurrence and bleeding events, respectively. RESULTS PS was considerably decreased in 3 candidates and PC was considerably reduced in 1 candidate, and they were excluded for high risk of VTE. Seventeen candidates in the borderline group and 137 in the normal group underwent donor surgery. One donor in the borderline group developed a wound hematoma. Postoperative complications were similar between the 2 groups. None of the donors in either group developed VTE. CONCLUSIONS Thrombophilia testing-guided VTE prophylaxis is safe and may contribute to reduced VTE risk in donors, although further investigations are warranted to assess the necessity of thrombophilia testing prior to surgery among living donors.

Successful Post-Transplant Psychiatric Interventions During Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Receiving Liver Transplants for Alcoholic Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND Around 20-30% of patients who undergo liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) will resume heavy drinking after LT. It is crucial to control post-transplant relapse of alcohol use, because alcoholic recidivism has been shown to have a negative impact on post-transplant compliance and long-term outcomes of LT recipients. However, there is currently no specific, effective psychiatric intervention for preventing additional alcohol consumption in clinical practice. CASE REPORT We present 3 patients who underwent LT for ALD at Nagoya University Hospital who were followed up for prolonged periods (7.2, 8.8, and 11.3 years, respectively), and review the psychiatric interventions employed to address critical situations. Additional alcohol consumption was noted in Case 1, but prompt collaborative care led to stable abstinence. In Case 2, marked anger and irritation were exacerbated as a result of work, but the anger was controlled by anger management. Case 3 abused a minor tranquilizer, but limit-setting resulted in adequate medical adherence. CONCLUSIONS Transplant teams need to provide comprehensive treatment for alcoholic recidivism to improve long-term health after LT for ALD.