Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Surg ; 44(4): 1302-1308, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31853590

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes when using a micropuncture access set (MS) to those when using a conventional puncture set (CS) for implantation of totally implantable venous access device (TAVID). METHODS: A total of 314 patients undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer were included between June 2015 and July 2018. Of these, 123 (39.2%) received TAVID implantation using MS and 191 patients (60.8%) received TAVID using CS. Perioperative outcomes and complications were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, including body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, were not significantly different between the groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 25 patients (8.0%), and the rate and incidence of venous thrombosis were significantly higher in the CS group. There were no significant differences between the groups in other complications such as the rate of port site infection, deep vein thrombosis, obstruction, catheter dislocation, and skin complications (exposure). No incidence of catheter infection, port rotation, intraoperative bleeding, or pneumothorax was observed in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MS is a safe and feasible procedure and results in less thrombosis. MS may play an important role in improving outcomes for the implantation of TAVID.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Infusões Intravenosas/instrumentação , Punções , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia
2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 11998, 2019 08 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31427651

RESUMO

Advancement of the surgical modality and perioperative care are the two main dimensions for the modern improvement of surgical outcome. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the two by using the data from the single-port laparoscopic surgery and the early recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Patients who underwent elective surgery for primary adenocarcinoma of the colon were divided into three groups and compared: ERAS (multi-port laparoscopic surgery with ERAS perioperative care), Conventional-SILS (single-port surgery with conventional perioperative care), or Conventional-Multi (multi-port laparoscopic surgery with conventional perioperative care). Ninety-one, 83, and 96 patients were registered, respectively. There were no differences among the three groups in baseline characteristics except pathological stage and operation site in colon. Although the ERAS group started a soft diet earlier and had earlier discharge, there were no differences in intra- and post-operative morbidity rate, readmission rate, or reoperation rate. The ERAS perioperative care was a significant factor for reducing length of hospital stay in the multivariate analysis, while single-port surgery was not. In modern laparoscopic colon cancer treatment, a systemic approach such as the ERAS program appears to be more effective than a technical approach for significantly improving short-term surgical outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Período Pós-Operatório , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 146(1-3): 46-9, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21525045

RESUMO

The nuclear emergency exercise programme (NEEP) is a PC-based application intended for design and planning emergency preparedness and response (EP&R) exercises for a potential nuclear emergency in Korea. The application programme allows EP&R staff to create and edit exercise scenarios based on information customised for a specific nuclear power plant's emergency plans. NEEP includes the following features: (1) step-by-step guide to developing new exercise scenario according to emergency alarm level and potential accident type, (2) database of specific plant's field exercise scenarios that can be easily modified by users, (3) generating master scenario events list and messages of exercise participants and (4) allowing the quantitative evaluation of exercise participants from the view of exercise objectives and evaluator guides. NEEP also features tools for queries, reports and visualisation that can be used to create documentation during the scenario planning and exercise evaluation processes.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Emergências , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Desastres , Guias como Assunto , Planejamento em Saúde , Humanos , Coreia (Geográfico)
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA