Single-Center Experience of Pulmonary Endarterectomy for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: The Results from the Tabriz University Medical Sciences (TUMS) CTEPH Program.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains the preferred and potentially curative option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study aimed to report the results of PEA for CTEPH in a tertiary center in Tabriz, Iran. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 42 CTEPH patients undergoing PEA, who were enrolled in the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (TUMS-CTEPH) from January 2016 to October 2020. The main outcome measures included the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, the 6-Minute Walk Distance, hemodynamic measures in right heart catheterization, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the NYHA function class (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.34), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (47.1 ± 13 vs 27.9 ± 8 mm Hg), cardiac output (4.3 ± 1.06 vs 5.9 ± 1.2 L/min), and pulmonary vascular resistance (709.4 ± 297.5 vs 214 ± 77 dyn s/cm5). Fifteen patients (35%) developed complications. The most common complication (10 [23%]) was reperfusion injury. Also, postsurgical mortality was 4% during hospital admission and 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the first single-center report of PEA from Iran. Post-PEA and 1-year survival were acceptable as a referral center. PEA can be performed safe with low mortality. Greater awareness of PEA and patients' access to experienced CTEPH centers are important issues.

Outcome of Surgery for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease without Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a serious condition that results from incomplete resolution of thromboemboli in pulmonary arteries. Symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic disease may have normal hemodynamic at rest. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) in the absence of pulmonary hypertension as currently defined (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] < 20 mm Hg). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Here, we report four symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic and normal hemodynamic at rest (mPAP ≤20 mm Hg or 20 < mPAP < 25 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] < 240 dyn·s/cm5) who underwent PEA between September 2015 and September 2019. The main outcome measures were functional New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), hemodynamic measures in right heart catheterization (RHC), morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: There were significant improvement in function class (2.6 ± 0.54 vs. 1 ± 0.2, p = 0.00), mPAP (preoperative: 23.3 ± 0.5 mm Hg vs. postoperative: 18.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg, p = 0.02), 6MWD (preoperative: 378.2 ± 68.7 m vs. postoperative: 432.9 ± 44.5 m, p = 0.01), and PVR (215.33 ± 91 vs. 101 ± 32 dyn·s/cm5, p = 0.1) 6 months after surgery based on data from RHC which was done during exercise. Also, RHC showed a significant decrease in mPAP (preoperative: 37 ± 7.7 mm Hg vs. postoperative 28 ± 3.2 mm Hg, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: PEA could improve function class and hemodynamic in patients with CTEPD. Considering hemodynamic improvement in this group of patients after PEA, definition of CTEPH may need to be revised.