Practical guidance for the evaluation of disease progression and the decision to change treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy.

After failure of first-line chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and platinum compounds for advanced gastric cancer, second-line chemotherapy with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, which elicits a durable response, and third-line or later chemotherapy with nivolumab have been shown to lead to a more favorable prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients. As new and more effective drugs are now available, sequential chemotherapy would contribute to prolonged survival. From this point of view, the patient's disease course should be frequently monitored in order to adapt treatment regimens. This review summarizes the points to note in regard to radiological assessment, and discusses the integration of prognostic factors, tumor markers, and clinical symptoms that need to be taken into account to change treatment at an appropriate timing.

Neoadjuvant CapeOx therapy followed by sphincter-preserving surgery for lower rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study investigates the safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin capecitabine (CapeOx), followed by laparoscopic surgery, for lower rectal cancer, and its efficacy in preserving the sphincter. METHODS: Ten patients with diagnosed lower rectal cancer received three or four cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx chemotherapy, prior to undergoing low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection, with total mesorectal excision. The primary outcomes were R0 resection and the rate of sphincter preservation. RESULTS: Nine patients completed CapeOx as scheduled and a partial response was achieved in four; thus, the overall response rate was 40% (n = 4/10). After surgical intervention, 80% of tumors displayed downstaging. Postoperative anastomosis leakage developed in one patient. The distance from the anal verge to the tumor increased by 60% (median 1.5 cm) after CapeOx treatment. The anal sphincter was preserved in all patients and all pathological distal and radial margins were negative (R0 resections). A pathological complete response was achieved in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant CapeOx chemotherapy is a promising approach, because it extended the distance from the anus to the tumor. Subsequent laparoscopic intervention for advanced lower rectal cancer could allow for safe preservation of the sphincter.

A phase II study of the safety of olanzapine for oxaliplatin based chemotherapy in coloraectal patients.

Olanzapine has exhibited efficacy as an antiemetic agent when used with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dexamethasone, and NK1 receptor antagonists for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In addition, several studies have reported the efficacy or safety of olanzapine in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, including carboplatin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. However, no reports of olanzapine use have focused on patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Therefore, we analyzed the safety of antiemetic therapy using olanzapine, palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in colorectal cancer patients undergoing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. This study was a prospective phase II single-institution study of 40 patients (median age 60 years, 23 patients were male). The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events, and the exploratory endpoints were the rate of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Almost all patients (90%) had a performance status of 0. All patients received the scheduled antiemetic therapy. The most common adverse event was somnolence (n = 7 patients, 17.5%). All adverse events were grade 1. Thirty-six patients were included in the exploratory analysis of efficacy. No patients experienced vomiting during the first 120 h after chemotherapy, and complete response and complete control were both 86.1%. The rate of total control was 55.6% during the same time period. Olanzapine use with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dexamethasone, and NK1 receptor antagonists was safe for colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Combination antiemetic therapy with aprepitant/fosaprepitant in patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (SENRI trial): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.

INTRODUCTION: The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant is recommended in several guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea & vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Little is known about the feasibility and safety of aprepitant in patients treated with oxaliplatin. METHODS: In this multicentre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with colorectal cancer who underwent an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the control group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist+dexamethasone) or aprepitant group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist+dexamethasone+aprepitant or fosaprepitant) in the first course. All patients were treated with aprepitant/fosaprepitant therapy in the second course. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with no emesis. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients entered this clinical trial from 25 centres in Japan. Significantly more patients in the aprepitant group achieved no vomiting overall and delayed phase than those in the control group (95.7% versus 83.6%, and 95.7% versus 84.7%, respectively). The aprepitant group also had statistically significantly higher percentages of no significant nausea, complete response and complete protection than the control group overall. In the control group, the percentages of no vomiting were higher in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The incidence of vomiting occurred day 7 or later was significantly higher in the control group compared with the aprepitant group. Other adverse events were not significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: The aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy for prevention of CINV in colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based regimen.

A phase I trial of combination therapy using gemcitabine and S-1 concurrent with full-dose radiation for resectable pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Use of the fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 together with gemcitabine has shown striking anticancer effects. In this single-arm phase I trial of preoperative combination therapy using gemcitabine and S-1 concurrently with radiotherapy, we verified the safety and feasibility and determined the maximum-tolerated dose of each drug in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme was used. Patients with cytologically or histologically proven resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were administered 30-min intravenous gemcitabine infusions on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 and S-1 orally on days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33. A total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 5 times per week, 28 fractions) was concurrently delivered. Surgical exploration was scheduled 4-7 weeks after the final radiation fraction. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. No treatment-related deaths occurred during this study. Recommended doses were determined to be 80 mg/m(2) of S-1 daily and 1,000 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine. CA19-9 was reduced to <50 % of baseline values in 12 (75 %) of 16 measurable patients. Nineteen of 21 enrolled patients successfully underwent surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of gemcitabine and S-1 concurrent with full-dose radiation is feasible and well tolerated.