Non-lytic antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia does not attenuate inflammation: the PRISTINE trial.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response in pneumococcal infection is primarily driven by immunoreactive bacterial cell wall components [lipoteichoic acid (LTA)]. An acute release of these components occurs when pneumococcal infection is treated with ß-lactam antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that non-lytic rifampicin compared with lytic ß-lactam antibiotic treatment would attenuate the inflammatory response in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. METHODS: In the PRISTINE (Pneumonia treated with RIfampicin aTtenuates INflammation) trial, a randomized, therapeutic controlled, exploratory study in patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia, we looked at LTA release and inflammatory and clinical response during treatment with both rifampicin and ß-lactam compared with treatment with ß-lactam antibiotics only. The trial is registered in the Dutch trial registry, number NTR3751 (European Clinical Trials Database number 2012-003067-22). RESULTS: Forty-one patients with community-acquired pneumonia were included; 17 of them had pneumococcal pneumonia. LTA release, LTA-mediated inflammatory responses, clinical outcomes, inflammatory biomarkers and transcription profiles were not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PRISTINE study demonstrated the feasibility of adding rifampicin to ß-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia, but, despite solid in vitro and experimental animal research evidence, failed to demonstrate a difference in plasma LTA concentrations and subsequent inflammatory and clinical responses. Most likely, an inhibitory effect of human plasma contributes to the low immune response in these patients. In addition, LTA plasma concentration could be too low to mount a response via Toll-like receptor 2 in vitro, but may nonetheless have an effect in vivo.

[Clostridioides difficile infections]. / Clostridioides difficile-infecties in de eerste lijn.

Here, we describe the epidemiology, diagnostics, and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the primary health care setting. CDI is traditionally considered as a healthcare associated infection. However, infections with onset in the community represent a large proportion of CDI. Traditional CDI risk factors apply to the population encountered in general practice: age ≥50 years, malignancy or other underlying disease, hospital admission and/or antibiotic treatment in the past 3 months. Notably, about a third has had no recent antibiotic exposure nor has been admitted to a hospital. Based on diagnostic tests requested by the general practitioner, only half of CDI cases will be diagnosed. In this setting, it is advisable to request a diagnostic C. difficile test for patients with persisting or severe diarrhea and negative tests for traditional enteropathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter), also in the absence of traditional risk factors for CDI.

How to: prophylactic interventions for prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhoea, despite existing guidelines for infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship. The high associated health and economic burden of CDI calls for novel strategies to prevent the development and spread of CDI in susceptible patients. OBJECTIVES: We aim to review CDI prophylactic treatment strategies and their implementation in clinical practice. SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and the COCHRANE Library databases to identify prophylactic interventions aimed at prevention of CDI. The search was restricted to articles published in English since 2012. CONTENT: A toxin-based vaccine candidate is currently being investigated in a phase III clinical trial. However, a recent attempt to develop a toxin-based vaccine has failed. Conventional probiotics have not yet proved to be an effective strategy for prevention of CDI. New promising microbiota-based interventions that bind and inactivate concomitantly administered antibiotics, such as ribaxamase and DAV-132, have been developed. Prophylaxis of CDI with C. difficile antibiotics should not be performed routinely and should be considered only for secondary prophylaxis in very selected patients who are at the highest imminent risk for recurrent CDI (R-CDI) after a thorough evaluation. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be a very effective treatment for patients with multiple recurrences. Bezlotoxumab provides protection against R-CDI, mainly in patients with primary episodes and a high risk of relapse. IMPLICATIONS: There are no proven effective, evidenced-based prophylaxis options for primary CDI. As for secondary prevention, FMT is considered the option of choice in patients with multiple recurrences. Bezlotoxumab can be added to standard treatment for patients at high risk for R-CDI. The most promising strategies are those aimed at reducing changes in intestinal microbiota and development of a new effective non-toxin-based vaccine.