The efficacy of medical treatment for adenomyosis after adenomyomectomy.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH-a + levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) after adenomyomectomy for improved adenomyosis-associated symptoms. METHODS: Overall, 193 patients with adenomyosis included in this study were categorized into three groups: adenomyomectomy (n = 57, group 1), adenomyomectomy + GnRH-a (n = 83, group 2) and adenomyomectomy + GnRH-a + LNG-IUS (n = 53, group 3). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and uterine volumes were determined to evaluate the severity of adenomyosis. Dysmenorrhea improvement and uterine volume were the main outcomes. RESULTS: The VAS scores of all patients reduced from 7.3 (6.0, 8.5) to 0 (0, 0.6) at the 6 months after surgery, which were significantly higher in group 1 compared to other groups (P < 0.05). In groups 1, 2 and 3, there were 14, 7 and 4 patients, respectively, who suffered dysmenorrhea recurrence. The mean recurrent-free-survival (RFS) was 51.6 ± 2.4, 58.0 ± 1.2 and 58.3 ± 1.0 months, respectively, which was significantly shorter in group 1 (P < 0.05). The dysmenorrhea recurrences were 26.3%, 6.1%, 5.9% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, at the 36 months, which was significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.01). Significantly decreased uterine volumes were observed in all patients from 222.2 (147.6, 350.4) to 77.0 (65.9, 94.1) mL (P < 0.05) at the 6 month after surgery. CONCLUSION: Treatment GnRH-a and LNG-IUS after surgery could significantly reduce the recurrence and prolong the RFS. It seemed that the use of LNG-IUS was beneficial for a lower recurrence in long-term follow-up.

Understanding delays in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia care: Application of the theoretical domains framework to identify factors affecting primary care clinicians' referral behaviours.

INTRODUCTION: Patients in the community with suspected Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) should be urgently referred to vascular services for investigation and management. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) allows identification of influences on health professional behaviour in order to inform future interventions. Here, the TDF is used to explore primary care clinicians' behaviours with regards to recognition and referral of CLTI. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 podiatrists, nurses and general practitioners in primary care. Directed content analysis was performed according to the framework method. Utterances were coded to TDF domains, and belief statements were defined by grouping similar utterances. Relevance of domains was confirmed according to belief frequency, presence of conflicting beliefs and the content of the beliefs indicating relevance. RESULTS: Nine TDF domains were identified as relevant to primary care clinicians: Knowledge, Environmental context and resources, Memory, Decision and attention processes, Beliefs about capabilities, Skills, Emotions, Reinforcement and Behavioural regulation. Relationships across domains were identified, including how primary care clinician confidence and working in a highly pressurized environment can affect behaviour. CONCLUSION: We have identified key barriers and enablers to timely recognition and referral behaviour. These beliefs identify targets for theory-driven behaviour change interventions to reduce delays in CLTI pathways.

The symptom to assessment pathway for suspected chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) affects quality of care: a process mapping exercise.

BACKGROUND: Delays in the pathway from first symptom to treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are associated with worse mortality and limb loss outcomes. This study examined the processes used by vascular services to provide urgent care to patients with suspected CLTI referred from the community. METHODS: Vascular surgery units from various regions in England were invited to participate in a process mapping exercise. Clinical and non-clinical staff at participating units were interviewed, and process maps were created that captured key staff and structures used to create processes for referral receipt, triage and assessment at the units. RESULTS: Twelve vascular units participated, and process maps were created after interviews with 45 participants. The units offered multiple points of access for urgent referrals from general practitioners and other community clinicians. Triage processes were varied, with units using different mixes of staff (including medical staff, podiatrists and s) and this led to processes of varying speed. The organisation of clinics to provide slots for 'urgent' patients was also varied, with some adopting hot clinics, while others used dedicated slots in routine clinics. Service organisation could be further complicated by separate processes for patients with and without diabetes, and because of the organisation of services regionally into vascular networks that had arterial and non-arterial centres. CONCLUSIONS: For referred patients with symptoms of CLTI, the points of access, triage and assessment processes used by vascular units are diverse. This reflects the local context and ingenuity of vascular units but can lead to complex processes. It is likely that benefits might be gained from simplification.