The acetabular roof reinforcement plate for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: results in 59 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Open reduction and internal fixation is considered the gold standard of treatment for displaced acetabular fractures in younger patients. For elderly patients with osteoporotic bone quality, however, primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the advantage of immediate postoperative mobilization might be an option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment of displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures using the acetabular roof reinforcement plate (ARRP) combined with THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 84 patients were operated using the ARRP combined with THA. Inclusion criteria were displaced osteoporotic fractures of the acetabulum with or without previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, age above 65 years, and pre-injury ability to walk at least with use of a walking frame. Of the 84 patients, 59 could be followed up after 6 months clinically and radiographically. Forty-nine (83%) were primary fractures and 10 (17%) periprosthetic acetabular fractures. RESULTS: The mean age was 80.5 years (range 65-98 years). The average time from injury to surgery was 8.5 days (range 1-28). Mean time of surgery was 167 min (range 100-303 min). Immediate postoperative full weight bearing (FWB) was allowed for 51 patients (86%). At the 6-month follow-up, all 59 patients except one showed bony healing and incorporation of the ARRP. One case developed a non-union of the anterior column. No disruption, breakage or loosening of the ARRP was seen. Additional CT scans performed in 18 patients confirmed bony healing. Twenty-six patients (44%) had regained their pre-injury level of mobility. Complications requiring revision surgery occurred in 8 patients. Five of them were suffering from a prosthetic head dislocation, one from infection, one from hematoma and one from a heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSIONS: The ARRP has proven to provide sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate FWB in most cases and represents a valuable option for the surgical management of displaced acetabular fractures in this challenging patient group.

A simple approach for the preoperative assessment of sacral morphology for percutaneous SI screw fixation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation under fluoroscopic control is an effective method for posterior pelvic ring stabilization. However, sacral dysmorphism has a high risk of L5 nerve injury. This study describes a simple method for the preoperative assessment of the sacral morphology using CT scans with widely available tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of 1000 patients were analyzed. True inlet, outlet, and lateral views of the sacrum were obtained using a two-dimensional reconstruction tool to align the sacrum in a reproducible manner. Corridor morphology in the inlet view was measured to calculate different morphological types: (1) Ascending type, (2) Horizontal type, and (3) Descending type. In a second step, the corridor was analyzed for the presence of an anterior indentation of the sacrum between the SI joint and the midsagittal plane with proximity to the nerve root L5, which, therefore, may be harmed during screw misplacement. RESULTS: A notch was found in the majority of cases with relative frequencies ranging from 69 % (upper quartile of S1) to 95 % (upper quartile of S2). Descending types were, by far, the most frequent corridor type with one exception: In the upper quartile of S1, the ascending type was the most frequent corridor (71 %). Horizontal types were less frequent with a relative incidence between 2 and 14 %. DISCUSSION: This study should increase the awareness for sacral dysmorphism, emphasize the importance of a preoperative assessment of the osseous corridor, and provide a simple method for the preoperative assessment with widely available tools.

Neurological recovery after early versus delayed surgical decompression for acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Patients with tSCI requiring surgical spinal decompression presenting to 17 centres in Europe were recruited. Depending on the timing of decompression, patients were divided into early (≤ 12 hours after injury) and late (> 12 hours and < 14 days after injury) groups. The American Spinal Injury Association neurological (ASIA) examination was performed at baseline (after injury but before decompression) and at 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) from baseline to 12 months. The final analyses comprised 159 patients in the early and 135 in the late group. Patients in the early group had significantly more severe neurological impairment before surgical treatment. For unadjusted complete-case analysis, mean change in LEMS was 15.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.1 to 19.0) in the early and 11.3 (95% CI 8.3 to 14.3) in the late group, with a mean between-group difference of 4.3 (95% CI -0.3 to 8.8). Using multiply imputed data adjusting for baseline LEMS, baseline ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), and propensity score, the mean between-group difference in the change in LEMS decreased to 2.2 (95% CI -1.5 to 5.9). Compared to late surgical decompression, early surgical decompression following acute tSCI did not result in statistically significant or clinically meaningful neurological improvements 12 months after injury. These results, however, do not impact the well-established need for acute, non-surgical tSCI management. This is the first study to highlight that a combination of baseline imbalances, ceiling effects, and loss to follow-up rates may yield an overestimate of the effect of early surgical decompression in unadjusted analyses, which underpins the importance of adjusted statistical analyses in acute tSCI research.

Preoperative planning and safe intraoperative placement of iliosacral screws under fluoroscopic control.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative planning of the starting point and safe trajectory for iliosacral screw (SI screw) fixation using CT scans for safe and accurate fluoroscopically controlled percutaneous SI screw placement. INDICATIONS: Transalar and transforaminal sacral fractures. SI joint disruptions and fracture-dislocations. Non- or minimally displaced spinopelvic dissociation injuries. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Transiliac instabilities. Sacral fractures with neurological impairment requiring decompression. Relevant residual displacement after closed reduction attempts. Insufficient fluoroscopic visualization of the anatomical landmarks of the upper sacrum. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative planning of the starting point and the safe screw trajectory using CT scans and two-dimensional multiplanar reformation tools. Fluoroscopically guided identification of the starting point using the lateral view according to preoperative planning. Advancing the guidewire under fluoroscopic control using inlet and outlet views according to the planned trajectory. Predrilling and placement of 6.5 mm cannulated screws. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Weightbearing as tolerated using crutches. Immediate CT scan in case of postoperative neurological impairment. Generally no screw removal. RESULTS: Fifty-nine screws were placed in 34 patients using the described technique. There were 2 cases of screw malpositioning (anatomical landmarks inadequately identified and fluoroscopically controlled SI screw fixation should thus not have been performed at all; in a case with sacral dysmorphism, preoperative planning suggested a posterior and/or caudal S1 starting point, respectively, but intraoperatively, selection of a different starting point and screw trajectory resulted in screw malpositioning with iatrogenic L5 nerve palsy).

Fluoroscopically guided acetabular posterior column screw fixation via an anterior approach.

OBJECTIVE: Safe posterior column screw fixation via an anterior approach under two-dimensional fluoroscopic control. INDICATIONS: Anterior column with posterior hemitransverse fractures (ACPHF); transverse fractures; two-column fractures and T­type fractures without relevant residual displacement of the posterior column after reduction of the anterior column and the quadrilateral plate. CONTRAINDICATION: Acetabular fractures requiring direct open reduction via a posterior approach; very narrow osseous corridor in preoperative planning; insufficient intraoperative fluoroscopic visualization of the anatomical landmarks. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative planning of the starting point and screw trajectory using a standard pelvic CT scan and a multiplanar reconstruction tool. Intraoperative fluoroscopically controlled identification of the starting point using the anterior-posterior (ap) view. Advancing the guidewire under fluoroscopic control using the lateral-oblique view. Lag screw fixation of the posterior column with cannulated screws. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight bearing as advised by the surgeon. Postoperative CT scan for the assessment of screw position and quality of reduction of the posterior column. Generally no implant removal. RESULTS: In a series of 100 pelvic CT scans, the mean posterior angle of the ideal posterior column screw trajectory was 28.0° (range 11.1-46.2°) to the coronal plane and the mean medial angle was 21.6° (range 8.0-35.0°) to the sagittal plane. The maximum screw length was 106.3 mm (range 82.1-135.0 mm). Twelve patients were included in this study: 10 ACPHF and 2 transverse fractures. The residual maximum displacement of the posterior column fracture component in the postoperative CT scan was 1.4 mm (0-4 mm). There was one intraarticular screw penetration and one perforation of the cortical bone in the transition zone between the posterior column and the sciatic tuber without neurological impairment.