Cognitive performance is associated with glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the CKD-REIN cohort.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with cognitive impairment in general population. We assessed the association between kidney and cognitive functions in patients with CKD and the influence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, and depression on this association. METHODS: The CKD-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network cohort included 3033 patients with CKD stages 3-4, followed for 5 years. Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration equation-creatinin formula. Evolution of the MMSE score over time and its association with baseline eGFR were investigated with linear mixed models. We assessed the risk of incident cognitive outcome (hospitalisation or death with relevant International Classification of Disease-10 codes), with a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.8, the mean eGFR was 33 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 387 patients (13.0%) had an MMSE score below 24 at baseline. A 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrement of baseline eGFR was associated with a mean MMSE decrease of 0.12 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.19) after adjustment for demographic characteristics, depression, CV risk factors and disease; but baseline eGFR was not associated with MMSE temporal evolution. HR for cognitive outcome during follow-up (median 2.01 years) associated with a 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrement of baseline eGFR was 1.35 (1.07, 1.70) (p=0.01) after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD, lower eGFR was associated with worse cognitive performance and incident cognitive events, independently of demographics, CV risk factors and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03381950.

Cognitive disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease: Approaches to prevention and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and early intervention may prevent the progression of this condition. METHODS: Here, we review interventions for the complications of CKD (anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, metabolic acidosis, harmful effects of dialysis, the accumulation of uremic toxins) and for prevention of vascular events, interventions that may potentially be protective against cognitive impairment. Furthermore, we discuss nonpharmacological and pharmacological methods to prevent cognitive impairment and/or minimize the latter's impact on CKD patients' daily lives. RESULTS: A particular attention on kidney function assessment is suggested during work-up for cognitive impairment. Different approaches are promising to reduce cognitive burden in patients with CKD but the availabe dedicated data are scarce. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for studies assessing the effect of interventions on the cognitive function of patients with CKD.

International practice patterns of dyslipidemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease under nephrology care: is it time to review guideline recommendations?

BACKGROUND: In contrast to guidelines related to lipid therapy in other areas, 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend conducting a lipid profile upon diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and treating all patients older than 50 years without defining a target for lipid levels. We evaluated multinational practice patterns for lipid management in patients with advanced CKD under nephrology care. METHODS: We analyzed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), LDL- cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and nephrologist-specified LDL-C goal upper limits in adult patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min from nephrology clinics in Brazil, France, Germany, and the United States (2014-2019). Models were adjusted for CKD stage, country, cardiovascular risk indicators, sex, and age. RESULTS: LLT treatment differed significantly by country, from 51% in Germany to 61% in the US and France (p = 0.002) for statin monotherapy. For ezetimibe with or without statins, the prevalence was 0.3% in Brazil to 9% in France (< 0.001). Compared with patients not taking lipid-lowering therapy, LDL-C was lower among treated patients (p < 0.0001) and differed significantly by country (p < 0.0001). At the patient level, the LDL-C levels and statin prescription did not vary significantly by CKD stage (p = 0.09 LDL-C and p = 0.24 statin use). Between 7-23% of untreated patients in each country had LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL. Only 7-17% of nephrologists believed that LDL-C should be < 70 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in practice patterns regarding LLT across countries but not across CKD stages. Treated patients appear to benefit from LDL-C lowering, yet a significant proportion of hyperlipidemia patients under nephrologist care are not receiving treatment.

Funding kidney research as a public health priority: challenges and opportunities.

Medical societies have a social responsibility to disseminate knowledge and inform health authorities on threats to public health posed by various diseases. Advocacy for health protection programmes and for medical research funding is now embedded into the missions of most scientific societies. To promote kidney research funding in Europe, the European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA), rather than acting as an individual society advocating for the fight against kidney disease, has actively helped to create an alliance of national associations centred on kidney diseases, the European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA), and joined the Biomedical Alliance (BMA). The ERA-EDTA is fully committed to supporting its working groups (WGs) and consortia of its members to allow them to produce valuable kidney research. The framing and formalization of projects, and the regulatory issues related to submission to the European Commission, are complex. To help WGs to gain expert advice from agencies with specific know-how, the ERA-EDTA has adopted a competitive approach. The best research projects proposed by WGs and consortia of other European investigators will receive seed funding to cover the costs of consultancy by expert agencies. Via its broader platforms, the EKHA and the BMA, the ERA-EDTA will strive towards broader recognition of kidney disease and related clusters of non-communicable diseases, by European and national agencies, as major threats to the qualities of life of their populations and their economies.

Reconsidering the Lack of Urea Toxicity in Dialysis Patients.

Urea is an old uremic toxin which has been used for many years as a global biomarker of CKD severity and dialysis adequacy. Old studies were not in favor of its role as a causal factor in the pathogenesis of complications associated with the uremic state. However, recent experimental and clinical evidence is compatible with both direct and indirect toxicity of urea, particularly via the deleterious actions of urea-derived carbamylated molecules. Further studies are clearly needed to explore the potential relevance of urea-related CKD complications for patient management, in particular the place of new therapeutic strategies to prevent urea toxicity.

Association of Serum Phosphate with Efficacy of Statin Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Statins are less efficacious in reducing cardiovascular disease risk in patients on dialysis than in the general population. Recent experimental data showed that phosphate excess promotes cellular de novo cholesterol synthesis through 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase activation. Whether this mechanism might account for the resistance of patients on dialysis to statins has not yet been explored. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this post hoc analysis, we examined the efficacy of statin treatment according to serum phosphate levels in the patients on dialysis who were participants of the A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Hemodialysis: An Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events (AURORA) trial using serum phosphate levels at baseline and during the trial course. We first classified the patients by groups of similar phosphate trajectories over time and tested whether phosphate as a longitudinal exposure (summarized by the identified trajectory groups) modulated the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause death. We replicate the analysis in the Deutsche Diabetes Dialyze Studie (4D) trial. RESULTS: In the AURORA trial, using multivariable analysis, we found that the treatment effect of statin on major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause death was significant and protective effects in patients with low values of serum phosphate gradually faded for higher phosphate levels >5 mg/dl. A similar lack of statin treatment efficacy for both outcomes was observed with high baseline phosphate levels (>5 mg/dl). In the 4D trial, we found a comparable but not significant trend toward losing treatment efficacy in the presence of high serum phosphate levels for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the limited treatment efficacy of statins in patients on dialysis in the presence of hyperphosphatemia.

Beta2-microglobulin.

Among the uremic toxins in the "middle molecule" range, beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) is certainly one of the most frequently studied compounds. Its serum level increases with the progression of chronic kidney disease, to reach very high concentrations in patients with end-stage kidney disease. It is the major protein component of dialysis-related amyloidosis, a dramatic complication which results from high extracellular concentration and posttranslational modification of beta2-M and a number of other promoters of amyloid fibril formation and deposition in osteo-articular tissues. Effective removal of beta2-M can be achieved with highly effective hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration techniques but predialysis session serum levels cannot be normalized. The prevalence and severity of beta2-M amyloidosis appear to have decreased in the last 20 years, although its occurrence may simply be delayed.

Conservative treatment of the uremic syndrome.

In addition to extracorporeal renal replacement strategies, which in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are largely reserved for the treatment of end-stage kidney failure, conservative measures can be taken to reduce concentration, effects, or both concentration and effects of uremic retention solutes. In this overview, we will focus on those therapies, which are aimed at preventing or delaying cardio-vascular disease, retarding or halting the progression of CKD, or both. We will discuss, consecutively, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, beta-blockers, calcium-channel antagonists, anti-inflammatory drugs, intestinal sorbents, calcimimetics, and glitazones. Some of these approaches could lead to a therapeutic breakthrough in the future. In addition, comprehensive tables will be provided for more traditional therapeutic approaches, such as lifestyle changes and other pharmaceutical treatments.

Uremic Toxins and Clinical Outcomes: The Impact of Kidney Transplantation.

Non-transplanted and transplanted patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) differ in terms of mortality and the risk of clinical events. This difference is probably due to the difference of both traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Uremic retention solutes may constitute important non-traditional risk factors in this population. In the present review, we selected a set of uremic toxins that have been associated with harmful effects, and are an appealing target for adjuvant therapy in CKD. For each toxin reviewed here, relevant studies were selected and the relationship with hard clinical outcomes of uremic toxins were compared between non-transplanted CKD patients and transplanted patients taking into account the level of glomerular filtration rate in these two situations.

[Iatrogenic angioedema: the role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blockers]. / Angio-oedèmes iatrogènes: rôle des inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion et des antagonistes des récepteurs à l'angiotensine II (sartans).

Nephrologists should be aware the fact that the angioedema is a common side effect not only under angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors treatment but also under sartans therapy. The frequency of angioedema under ACE inhibitors is estimated at 1 to 7 per thousand. The physiopathology of ACE angioedema implicates the lack of degradation of kinines due to the inhibition of multiple enzymes activity including ACE. Angioedema under sartans seems less frequent than this observed under ACE inhibitors. Its mechanism remains poorly defined, but implicates the increase of kinine production via the stimulation of angiotensin receptor type II, and/or the lack of degradation of kinines via multiple enzymes other than ACE. The frequency of the apparition of angioedema under sartans in patients who had have angioedema under ACE inhibitors is inconsistent and varied from 7.7% to 50%. Reports indicated that angioedema under ACE or sartans could have a spontaneous regression. However, the relapse of angioedema under these drugs should lead to the diagnosis of iatrogenic etiology, and to the drugs withdrawal. ACE inhibitors/Sartans-associated angioedema episodes need to be reported to the French Adverse Event Reporting System database to evaluate their frequency and to avoid severe consequences.

[Which optimal antihypertensive bitherapy for kidney patients?]. / Quelle bithérapie antihypertensive optimale pour les patients néphrologiques?

In this editorial review on the optimal antihypertensive treatment for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, we start with the controversy triggered by Casas et al., for proposing a bitherapy optimal not only for nephroprotection, but also for global cardiovascular protection. The incidence of cardiovascular complications are indeed much greater than the occurrence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in these patients, so that their prevention has at least the same priority. We explain the huge amount of discordant papers, on the basis of methodology deficiencies in the studies aiming at evidencing the truth of 2 antinomic concepts underlying this controversy: 1) "The correction by antihypertensive drugs of the cardiovascular risk excess in hypertensive patients is exclusively related to their blood pressure lowering effect, the optimal blood pressure (BP) level being defined by epidemiologists at 115/75 mmHg"; 2) "Independently of BP lowering effect, antihypertensive drugs may have intrinsic, protective or deleterious, renal and cardiovascular effects which may be variable according to the target organ". We think that truth is conciliating and that both mechanisms should not be exclusive. However more rigorous studies are still needed to evidence it. Meanwhile we propose the optimal therapy by hypokaliemic diuretics (thiazides+/-loop diuretics according to glomerular filtration decline)+inhibitors of the angiotensin AT1-receptor (ACE inhibitors or AT1RB), in preference to the association of dihydropyridines with diuretics. This recommendation is strong however, only for CKD patients with macroproteinuria. The priority that we give to diuretic therapy is based on the evidence that this class confers good prevention against both heart failure and strokes, which is not the case for all AT1-inhibitors and dihydropyridines. Furthermore the diuretics are the drugs with the longest antihypertensive effect (many weeks) and their efficiency in CKD patients is proportional to the sodium depletion they initially induce and therefore to the dose (specially of the loop diuretics). Indeed volemia control is an incontrovertible factor for optimal BP control in renal insufficiency. As regards the use of betablockers, they should no more be considered as first drug for hypertension because they have the strongest diabetogenic effect. They should be used selectively for their specific cardiologic indications such as angina, heart failure, arythmia and as substitute for ACEI or AT1RB when general anesthesia is considered. Regarding the choice between ACEI and AT(1)RB, on the basis of indirect comparisons, we think that the latter may grant a comparable cardiac protection while giving a better cerebral protection. We shall have to wait the results of ONTARGET study to have or not the evidence for this preference. Finally, we want to stress the necessity to individualize the treatment by taking into account coexistence of cardiovascular complications and of other diseases, as well as the tolerance of the treatment (which may be influenced by seasons, in particular the canicula one), and the cost of the drugs.

Strategies to improve monitoring disease progression, assessing cardiovascular risk, and defining prognostic biomarkers in chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global public health problem with significant gaps in research, care, and policy. In order to mitigate the risks and adverse effects of CKD, the International Society of Nephrology has created a cohesive set of activities to improve the global outcomes of people living with CKD. Improving monitoring of renal disease progression can be done by screening and monitoring albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate in primary care. Consensus on how many times and how often albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate are measured should be defined. Meaningful changes in both renal biomarkers should be determined in order to ascertain what is clinically relevant. Increasing social awareness of CKD and partnering with the technological community may be ways to engage patients. Furthermore, improving the prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with CKD can be achieved by including the renal risk markers albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate in cardiovascular risk algorithms and by encouraging uptake of assessing cardiovascular risk by general practitioners and nephrologists. Finally, examining ways to further validate and implement novel biomarkers for CKD will help mitigate the global problem of CKD. The more frequent use of renal biopsy will facilitate further knowledge into the underlying etiologies of CKD and help put new biomarkers into biological context. Real-world assessments of these biomarkers in existing cohorts is important, as well as obtaining regulatory approval to use these biomarkers in clinical practice. Collaborations among academia, physician and patient groups, industry, payer organizations, and regulatory authorities will help improve the global outcomes of people living with CKD.

Therapy of hyperhomocysteinemia in chronic kidney disease.

Recent published evidence suggests that the correction of the multiple remethylation pathway abnormalities in chronic kidney disease (CKD), beyond folate-related disturbances, enhanced removal of uremic toxins and/or homocysteine (Hcy), and maneuvers aimed to displace Hcy from protein-binding sites, may represent valuable strategies to normalize total Hcy concentrations in CKD patients. The relevance of decreasing Hcy levels for cardiovascular disease in CKD patients should be shown definitively by the results of ongoing randomized trials.

[Cardiovascular calcification inhibitors]. / Inhibiteurs des calcifications cardiovasculaires.

Vascular calcification is a marker of cardiovascular risk increase. Age and specific disease such as diabetes or chronic kidney disease are important factors for calcification genesis. Vascular calcification process is a complex phenomenon, involving several activators and inhibitors factors. Indeed, recent works related to in vitro and in vivo experimental studies have led to a better understanding of calcification process and identification of molecules able to modulate this system. This revue will summarize some of these molecules with a particular interest of those with therapeutic relevance. We will present: i) calcium sensing receptor and its modulation by cinacalcet; ii) pyrophosphate supplementation; iii) fetuin A and overall propensity serum test for calcification and finally; iv) matrix-Gla-protein and the use of vitamin K to prevent vascular calcification progression.