Prevention of spinal cord injury after repair of the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta.

Spinal cord injury occurring as the result of surgical repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic disease remains a devastating complication. The incidence of postoperative neurologic deficits varies from 4% to 38%. Factors associated with a greater risk for injury include the presence of dissection or extensive thoracoabdominal disease, and a prolonged cross-clamp time. Spinal cord ischemia initiates a deleterious cascade of biochemical events that ultimately result in an increased intracellular calcium concentration. Calcium-activated proteases, lipases, and nucleases mediate the processes that cause cell injury. The accumulation of oxygen-derived free radicals and the occurrence of hyperemia during reperfusion are also contributing causes of spinal cord injury. Increasing the spinal cord blood flow with shunts, oxygenated bypass circuits, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, the intrathecal administration of vasodilators, and the reattachment of intercostal arteries has been tried in an effort to increase spinal cord perfusion. Pharmacologically based measures to prevent spinal cord injury have been pursued, and these have consisted of hypothermia, anesthetic agents, calcium channel blockers, free radical scavengers, and immune system modulation. However, no single technique has proved to be consistently effective in preventing ischemia-induced spinal cord injury.

Stroke rate is markedly reduced after carotid endarterectomy by avoidance of protamine.

PURPOSE: Postoperative neurologic injury remains a significant risk of carotid endarterectomy. Mechanisms include embolization of debris and formation of thrombus on the newly endarterectomized surface. We hypothesized that the risk of postoperative neurologic injury would be lower in those patients who did not receive protamine for reversal of heparin anticoagulation. METHODS: We reviewed 348 consecutive primary carotid endarterectomies performed since January 1, 1986, to determine the relationship between surgical outcomes and reversal of heparin anticoagulation. Patients undergoing additional simultaneous cardiovascular procedures were excluded. One hundred ninety-three patients received protamine after completion of the endarterectomy. The remaining 155 patients did not receive any protamine. RESULTS: All patients in both groups survived to discharge. There were no strokes in those patients who did not receive any protamine; however, the stroke rate in the protamine group was 2.6% (5 of 193), p < 0.045. The incidence of hematoma requiring reexploration was 1.0% (2 of 193) and 1.9% (3 of 155) in the protamine and no-protamine groups, respectively (p = NS). Intraoperative shunting was used more frequently in the no-protamine group (84% vs 67%, p < 0.001), and patch angioplasty was performed more frequently in the protamine group (35% vs 15%, p < 0.001). However, neither shunting nor patching significantly influenced stroke rates. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that carotid endarterectomy without reversal of heparin anticoagulation is associated with a reduced postoperative stroke rate without a significant increase in morbidity rates.