Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 48(3): 181-183, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31724176

RESUMO

Omphalocele is rarely complicated by umbilical cord cysts. In our case, an umbilical cord cyst and fetal ascites were detected at 26 weeks' gestation in a fetus with trisomy 13. This changed to omphalocele with subsequently absorbed fetal ascites at 35 weeks' gestation. We propose two hypotheses. The abdominal wall may have been physically pierced or an omphalocele might have preexisted, and the intestinal tract in the hernia sac was pushed by fetal ascites.


Assuntos
Cistos/complicações , Cistos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico por imagem , Hérnia Umbilical/etiologia , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Cordão Umbilical/diagnóstico por imagem , Cordão Umbilical/patologia , Parede Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Parede Abdominal/patologia , Adulto , Fissura Palatina/diagnóstico , Feminino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagem , Feto/patologia , Feto/cirurgia , Idade Gestacional , Hérnia Umbilical/cirurgia , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Síndrome da Trissomia do Cromossomo 13/diagnóstico
2.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 32(2): 109-12, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26520656

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Total bilirubin (T-bil) is used universally for monitoring post-portoenterostomy (PE) biliary atresia (BA) patients although other biochemical markers [BM; AST/ALT and platelet count (PC)] are also prognostic. We compared open PE (OPE) with laparoscopic PE (LPE) using T-bil, AST/ALT, and PC (3BM) as more comprehensive indicators of postoperative clinical status. METHODS: Subjects were 31 PE cases (LPE: n = 17; OPE: n = 14). BA classification was type III (n = 16), type II (n = 1) in LPE and type III (n = 12), type I (n = 1), type II (n = 1) in OPE. RESULTS: Mean ages and weights at PE were similar: 65.5 days, 4.4 kg (LPE) versus 69.3 days, 4.1 kg (OPE); and mean follow-up was 2.5 years for both LPE and OPE. Jaundice clearance (T-bil ≤1.2 mg/dL) was achieved in 16/17 (94.1 %) after LPE versus 10/14 (71.4 %) after OPE (p = NS), but 3BM were closer to normal after OPE. At the time of review, 13/17 LPE cases (76.5 %) were alive with native livers and 4/17 had received LTx (23.5 %) and 10/14 OPE cases (71.4 %) were alive with native livers and 4/14 had received LTx (28.6 %). CONCLUSIONS: Although JC was better after LPE, 3BM were better after OPE. Further follow-up will prove the comprehensive prognostic value of 3BM.


Assuntos
Atresia Biliar/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Portoenterostomia Hepática , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Prognóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(7): 1291-1295, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36935228

RESUMO

AIM: Retroperitoneal pyeloplasty (RP) for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) performed using retroperitoneoscopy (retro-RP) or robotic assistance (robo-RP) were compared. METHODS: All subjects were Japanese, matched for age, weight, and RP diameters. All RP were performed in the lateral decubitus position at a single institute by the same team using identical protocols. Five independent surgeons were asked to score intraoperative video recordings for perceived difficulty of suturing (DOS; 5 = impossible; 4 = difficult; 3 = tedious; 2 = slow; 1 = easy) and rank RP as +1 if robo-RP appeared to be superior, 0 if they appeared to be the same, and -1 if robo-RP appeared to be inferior. RESULTS: Robo-RP performed 2018-2022 (n = 22) were matched with retro-RP performed 2011-2019 (n = 34). Mean overall operative times were similar (robo-RP: 305.2 ± 57.8 min versus retro-RP: 340.0 ± 117.9 min; p = 0.19), but securing the larger retroperitoneal space required for robo-RP took significantly longer; 50.8 ± 13.9 min versus 24.3 ± 9.6 min; p < 0.0001. Total anastomotic time (TAT) and TAT per suture were both significantly shorter for robo-RP (p < 0.0001). The coefficient of variation for time taken to place one suture was smaller for robo-RP than for retro-RP. DOS was lower for robo-RP with less variance (p < 0.01). Robo-RP had shorter drainage tube insertion, ambulated quicker postoperatively, and shorter hospitalization. Retro-RP had anastomotic complications; leaks (n = 2) and strictures (n = 2, requiring conventional open re-pyeloplasty). Robo-RP had no anastomotic complications and was ranked +1 unanimously. CONCLUSIONS: The RP anastomosis was quicker with less complications and more precise with robotic assistance in matched patients under similar circumstances. Should RP be indicated, robo-RP is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Criança , Humanos , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA