Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Water Health ; 13(2): 473-88, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26042979

RESUMO

For discriminating between human and animal faecal contamination in water, microbial source tracking (MST) approaches using different indicators have been employed. In the current study, a range of 10 such MST indicators described in the scientific literature were comparatively assessed. Bacteriophages infecting host strains of Bacteroides (GA-17, GB-124 and ARABA 84) as well as sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria proved useful for indicating human faecal contamination while Rhodococcus coprophilus was associated with animal-derived faecal contamination. These potential source indicators were present in samples of faecal origin, i.e. either in human wastewater or animal waste, from many different regions in Switzerland and therefore showed a geographic stability. In addition, the MST indicators were abundant in surface water and were even sensitive enough to detect faecal contamination in spring water from two study areas in Switzerland. This is the first study that has compared and successfully applied MST methods in spring water.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Água Doce , Poluentes da Água/química , Poluição da Água/prevenção & controle , Animais , Bactérias/classificação , Humanos , Especificidade da Espécie , Microbiologia da Água
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA