Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 30(3): 441-449, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300894

RESUMO

Adolescents' exposure to negative life events (NLEs) and potentially traumatic events is highly prevalent and increases their risk of developing psychological disorders considerably. NLE exposure has also been linked to the development of social anxiety disorder (SAD) among older children and young adolescents. Despite the relatively low treatment efficacy reported for children and adolescents suffering from SAD, few studies have addressed the extent to which resilience factors, such as social support and social self-efficacy, are associated with SAD symptoms. This study examined whether social support and social self-efficacy predict, and buffer against SAD symptoms using a large, population-based sample of adolescents, among whom a large proportion have experienced NLEs. The results reveal that NLEs are significantly associated with SAD symptoms, while social support and social self-efficacy are both negatively associated with SAD symptoms. Only the NLEs × social support interaction significantly predicted SAD symptoms, with social support attenuating the association between NLEs and SAD symptoms. Moreover, increases in both social self-efficacy and social support were associated with reduced SAD symptoms, over and above variance explained by social support alone. Our cumulative results suggest that interventions that can modify both social support and social self-efficacy may help reduce SAD symptoms in at-risk adolescents.


Assuntos
Fobia Social/psicologia , Autoeficácia , Apoio Social , Adolescente , Ansiedade/psicologia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Couns Psychol ; 65(1): 86-97, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28541060

RESUMO

Psychotherapists have long questioned what mediating processes are linked to outcome of psychotherapy. Few studies examining this question have assessed within-person changes in the process outcome relationship over time. The present study examined changes in cognition and metacognition over the course of therapy using a dataset from a randomized controlled trial comparing Metacognitive therapy (MCT) and Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The sample included 74 patients measured on process and symptom instruments weekly throughout therapy. Multilevel longitudinal models (sessions nested within patients) were used to examine the relationship between metacognition, cognition, and anxiety. Main effects of metacognition and cognition on anxiety and the interaction with treatment, as well as the reciprocal relationships, were investigated. The results indicate a main effect of both cognitions and metacognitions on predicting anxiety. However, there was no interaction with treatment condition. The reciprocal relationship of anxiety on metacognitions was larger in MCT compared with CBT. This is the first study documenting within-person effects of both cognitions and metacognitions on anxiety over the course of therapy. Implications for therapy are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Variação Biológica Individual , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Metacognição , Adulto , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Cognição/fisiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metacognição/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry ; 72: 101650, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667828

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Measures of patient motivation have proven elusive, showing inconsistent results in relation to psychotherapy outcome. How patients talk about change is an alternative measure of motivation, with potential value in predicting treatment outcome. This study had two aims: (1) to examine if change talk and sustain talk (including its subcategories) predicted reduction in worry levels at post-treatment and 2-year follow-up, and (2) if there were differences between the cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and metacognitive therapy (MCT) conditions with respect to change talk. METHODS: This study investigated 24 patients receiving CBT and 27 patients receiving MCT for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and coded patients' utterances in sessions 1 and 4. RESULTS: Change talk was significantly associated with lower worry levels at post-treatment and 2-year follow-up, beyond initial worry severity and treatment condition. Change talk in session 4, and reduction in sustain talk from session 1 to 4, was positively associated with improvement, whilst sustain talk in session 4 showed a negative relationship. More specifically, commitment statements in session 1 and expressing signs of taking steps at session 4 were associated with reduction in worry levels. Moreover, patients in the MCT condition argued more both for and against change during session 1, but not session 4. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that change talk sustain talk could be important in the treatment of GAD.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Metacognição , Adulto , Ansiedade , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Anxiety Disord ; 50: 103-112, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28651207

RESUMO

Few studies have compared the effects of Metacognitive therapy (MCT) and Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for comorbid anxiety disorders. In the current study we compared CBT and MCT for heterogeneous anxiety disorders in a residential setting. Ninety patients with a primary diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Social Phobia or Panic disorder, with and without Agoraphobia, were randomized to either CBT or MCT. Patients were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment and one-year follow-up. Primary outcome measures were Beck Anxiety Inventory and ADIS IV and secondary outcome measures were SCID II, Beck Depression Inventory, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, The Symptom Checklist-90 and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-64. Treatment fidelity was satisfactory and therapist credibility was equal in both treatments. There was a significant difference in the level of anxiety favouring MCT at post-treatment (d=0.7), but there were no differences at one-year follow-up, mainly due to a further improvement in the CBT group during the follow-up period. Both treatments were efficacious. No differences in effect on comorbid diagnoses and symptoms were found, but MCT produced larger change in personality problems. MCT seems to have a more rapid effect on anxiety symptoms, but there were no significant differences in the long term for patients with comorbid anxiety disorders.


Assuntos
Agorafobia/terapia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Metacognição , Transtorno de Pânico/terapia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Adulto , Agorafobia/complicações , Agorafobia/psicologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/complicações , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtorno de Pânico/complicações , Transtorno de Pânico/psicologia , Fobia Social/terapia , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA