"Best practice' for Helicobacter pylori eradication in the primary care setting.

This study determined the relative cost effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) based triple therapy regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication in the primary care setting. Using decision tree analysis the expected cost for each H. pylori eradication strategy was determined from the cost of each treatment option multiplied by the probability of that option occurring. Probabilities were obtained using the GMS prescribing database where all patients who received amoxycillin, clarithromycin and a PPI in the ERHA region in 2002 were followed for one year. Depending on the regimen adopted, 40.8% to 46.1% of patients did not require any further medication in the year following H. pylori eradication treatment. The strategy of rabeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin was the most cost effective option with a cost of Euro466 per asymptomatic patient. Two-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the cost of rabeprazole triple therapy and the duration of rabeprazole maintenance therapy would each have to increase by 30% before this strategy ceased to be the most cost effective and hence best practice option for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in the primary care setting in Ireland.

Nutritional therapy in Crohn's disease.

The value of nutritional support in the prevention and treatment of malnutrition in Crohn's disease is undisputed but its role in primary therapy continues to be debated. Controlled trials have demonstrated that enteral nutrition induces remission rates comparable to that of corticosteroid therapy in Crohn's disease and remains the treatment of choice for specific subgroups such as children with signs of growth impairment and patients with intolerable steroid-induced side effects. The mechanism by which an enteral diet induces remission in Crohn's disease is unclear. Bowel rest, reduced antigenic load, nutritional effects, the provision of trophic amino acids, modification of gut flora, intestinal permeability, or fecal pH have been proposed. Equally, the fat profile of the feed may reduce pro-inflammatory ecosanoid synthesis and thus modify disease activity. Maintaining long-term remission remains a challenge in the management of this disease. Cyclic administration of enteral diets, maintenance drug therapy, fat manipulated formulas, or fish oil therapy may be strategies to prolong diet-induced remission. In the future, nutrient derivatives that play a role in the protective processes of the intestinal mucosa may have application in nutritional therapy in Crohn's disease.

Review article: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection and factors influencing eradication.

Currently available Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies are considered very effective and safe. The most recent eradication guidelines proposed in the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report recommend the use of proton pump inhibitors (standard b.d.) along with clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (1000 mg b.d.) or metronidazole (500 mg b.d.) for a minimum of 7 days. The combination of amoxycillin and clarithromycin is preferred because it may favour best results with a second-line proton pump inhibitor quadruple therapy. The recommended second-line therapy includes a combination of a proton pump inhibitor (standard b.d.) with bismuth salt (subsalicylate/subcitrate 120 mg q.d.s.), metronidazole (500 mg t.d.s.), and tetracycline (500 mg q.d.s.) for a minimum of 7 days. Extended proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy can be used if bismuth is not available. Specialists should manage subsequent failures. Based on direct and indirect evidence from well-designed studies and clinical experience, eradication is recommended in gastric and duodenal ulcers, MALToma, atrophic gastritis, postgastric cancer resection, and in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients. The most common reason for treatment failure is poor compliance with eradication guidelines. Antibiotic resistance may be a significant factor in certain geographical areas. Proton pump inhibitors are an integral part of the eradication regimens as proved by meta-analyses of clinical trials. Novel agents used in secondary failure are few and depend on the use of new antibiotics. The role of H. pylori-specific antibiotics, probiotics, and vaccines is not established as yet. Widespread acceptance of the eradication guidelines should be regarded as the single most important factor in eradication success.

Efficacy and safety of single-triple capsules of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline, given with omeprazole, for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: an international multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole demands treatments more effective than standard bismuth-based triple therapy against these strains. AIM: To evaluate the H. pylori eradication rate in both metronidazole-sensitive and -resistant strains following quadruple therapy using single-triple capsules of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline, given with omeprazole. METHODS: One hundred and seventy valid patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia were treated in eight centres located in five countries. H. pylori was confirmed at baseline using 13C-urea breath test, histology and/or culture. Patients received three single-triple capsules q.i.d. and omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., for 10 days. Each capsule contained bismuth biskalcitrate, 140 mg (as 40 mg Bi2O3 equivalent), metronidazole, 125 mg, and tetracycline, 125 mg. 13C-Urea breath test was repeated at least 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: Overall eradication rates were 93% (158/170) by modified intention-to-treat analysis and 97% (142/146) by per protocol analysis. Eradication rates were 93% (40/43) and 95% (38/40) for strains resistant to metronidazole and 95% (82/86) and 99% (75/76) for strains sensitive to metronidazole by modified intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: This omeprazole-bismuth biskalcitrate-metronidazole-tetracycline 10-day regimen is a very effective and well-tolerated treatment, which overcomes metronidazole resistance.

Incidence of duodenal ulcer healing after 1 week of proton pump inhibitor triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The Lansoprazole Helicobacter Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A number of clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of short-term twice-daily Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens but few have investigated the proportion of patients in whom duodenal ulcer disease was healed with these regimens. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of four 1-week H. pylori eradication regimens in the healing of H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: Following endoscopic confirmation of duodenal ulcer disease and a positive CLO test, patients underwent a 13C-urea breath test to confirm H. pylori status. Treatment with one of four regimens: LAC, LAM, LCM or OAM, where L is lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., A is amoxycillin 1 g b.d., M is metronidazole 400 mg b.d., C is clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., and O is omeprazole 20 mg b.d., was assigned randomly to those patients who were H. pylori positive, with 62 (LAC), 64 (LAM), 61 (LCM) and 75 (OAM) patients in each treatment group. Follow-up breath tests and endoscopies were performed at least 28 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Duodenal ulcer disease was healed 28 days after treatment in 53/62 (85.5%) patients who were treated with LAC, 52/64 (81.3%) of patients treated with LAM, 49/61 (80.3%) of patients treated with LCM and 60/75 (80.0%) of patients treated with OAM (intention-to-treat analysis, n = 262, assumed unhealed if no follow-up endoscopy was performed). All the treatments were of similar efficacy (P = 0.85, chi-squared test) with regard to the healing of duodenal ulcer disease. CONCLUSIONS: The four 1-week treatment regimens were equally effective in healing H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease.

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a discrepancy between current guidelines and clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines recommend that patients with peptic ulcer disease, and other causes of dyspepsia, should be treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. However, it has not been firmly established whether physicians have adapted their practice accordingly. OBJECTIVES: (1) To establish the proportion of ulcer-healing prescriptions that H. pylori eradication regimens accounted for, (2) to evaluate the composition of the eradication regimens used, and (3) to compare the prescribing patterns of specialist and primary care practitioners. METHODS: Seven community pharmacy practices were identified, and all prescriptions for individual acid-suppressing agents and eradication regimens were prospectively evaluated over an initial one-month period. Prospective documentation and evaluation of eradication regimens only was then continued for a further three-month period. RESULTS: The prescriptions for 585 patients were evaluated. Proton-pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists accounted for 261 (44.5%) and 307 (52.5%) of prescriptions respectively. H. pylori eradication therapy was prescribed for 17 (2.9%) patients in this initial period. Sixty-six eradication regimens were evaluated over four months: 48/66 (73%) of these were initiated by primary care practitioners and 18/66 (27%) by specialists. Thirteen different combinations of antibiotics and acid-suppressing agents were identified - many of undocumented efficacy. Dual, triple and quadruple regimens accounted for 15 (23%), 48 (72.5%) and 3 (4.5%) of patient prescriptions respectively. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication therapy currently accounts for a very small proportion of ulcer-healing medication in clinical practice. Most eradication regimens are initiated by primary care practitioners. In comparison with specialist practices, prescriptions from this source are more likely to be of undocumented efficacy.

Omeprazole, amoxycillin and metronidazole for the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection.

OBJECTIVE: In two studies, different regimens of omeprazole-amoxycillin-metronidazole were assessed for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. DESIGN: Randomized, international, multicentre studies with parallel groups. SETTING: The studies were performed at centres in Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden and UK. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer disease (active or in remission) were randomized to 7-day treatment with: omeprazole 40 mg once daily, amoxycillin 500 mg three times daily and metronidazole 400 mg three times daily (OAMtid; n = 242); omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, amoxycillin 1000 mg twice daily and metronidazole 800 mg twice daily (OAM800; n = 247); or omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, amoxycillin 1000 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg twice daily (OAM400; n = 127). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eradication of H. pylori. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed H. pylori eradication rates of 76% (184/242) with OAMtid, 80% (198/247) with OAM800, and 76% (97/127) with OAM400. There was considerable variation in the levels of primary resistance to metronidazole in different countries. The overall eradication rate in patients infected with metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori strains was 85% (313/370), compared with 60% (56/94) in patients harbouring metronidazole-resistant strains (P<0.001). All regimens were generally well tolerated, with mild adverse events occurring in 4-26% of patients (mainly diarrhoea, reversible increase in liver enzymes and headache). CONCLUSION: The OAM combination is effective in curing H. pylori infection. Primary metronidazole resistance may reduce its effectiveness, but an increased daily dosing of metronidazole may partly overcome this problem.

Consensus guidelines: agreement and debate surrounding the optimal management of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori is a recognized cause of a variety of gastroduodenal pathology. The high prevalence of both H pylori infection and related diseases within the community warrants its consideration as a public health care issue. The availability of reliable and safe noninvasive diagnostic techniques coupled with the development of effective and tolerable treatments has enabled primary health care personnel to manage this infection actively. The role of the primary care physician in the future management of H pylori infection is thus of central importance. The wealth of evidence produced by over 15 years of research into H pylori has expanded the list of disease associations and treatment benefits as well as elucidated the pathophysiological mechanisms involved. As a result, there has been a growing need to harmonize this information with clinical practice and to provide direction for the appropriate management by both specialists and general practitioners. Several national guidelines have been produced. The areas relating to H pylori infection that they considered and their recommendations vary. In 1994, the National Institutes of Health produced globally accepted recommendations for the management of H pylori-related peptic ulceration. The broader role of H pylori as a gastroduodenal pathogen and a public health care issue was not addressed. Recently, European and Canadian consensus guidelines have been published that identified overall management issues, including the role of primary and specialist care, and considered the appropriateness of employing eradication therapy for the spectrum of conditions in which H pylori has a direct or indirect association based on the available information. These guidelines, while in agreement regarding many issues, differ considerably in their recommendations for primary health care and regarding central issues such as the management of dyspepsia and gastric cancer. Some variations may reflect differing health care structures as well as the prevalence of both infection and associated diseases. However, the interpretation of evidence produced by recent research contributes to their conflicting statements.

Review article: the effects of antitumour necrosis factor-α on bone metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of osteoporosis. A number of studies have emerged in recent years indicating that tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockade appears to have a beneficial effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in IBD patients. AIMS: To provide a review of the available data regarding the effect of the currently licensed anti-TNF-α therapies on bone metabolism and BMD in IBD patients. METHODS: A Medline search was performed using the search terms 'infliximab', 'bone metabolism', 'IBD', 'BMD', 'bone markers', 'adalimumab', 'bone disease', 'Crohn's disease' and 'ulcerative colitis'. RESULTS: Infliximab has a beneficial effect on bone turnover markers in Crohn's disease (CD) patients in the short term. The longest study to date comprising 24 CD patients showed an overall improvement in two bone formation markers - b-alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.022) and osteocalcin (P = 0.008) at 4 months post-treatment. Moreover, the largest study to date comprising 71 CD patients showed significant improvement in sCTx, a bone resorption marker (P = 0.04) at week-8 post-treatment. There is little data looking at the effect of anti-TNF-α therapy on bone metabolism in ulcerative colitis. Moreover, the long-term effects of anti-TNF-α therapy on bone structure and fracture risk in IBD patients are currently not known. The effect of cessation of anti-TNF-α therapy on bone metabolism is also unknown. CONCLUSION: Properly controlled long-term trials are needed to fully evaluate the impact of TNF blockade on bone mineral density.

Review article: use of antitumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and conception.

BACKGROUND: One of the most frequently asked questions during consultation with those affected by inflammatory bowel disease is what are its effects on pregnancy, and how the treatment will impact on conception and pregnancy outcomes. AIM: To review available data regarding the safety of biological therapies during pregnancy, primarily in woman with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: A Medline search was performed and available original research and review articles relating to the use of biological (antitumour necrosis factor-alpha) therapies in inflammatory bowel disease were reviewed. Where information regarding the use of a drug in inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy was limited, articles referring to its use for other indications, such as rheumatoid arthritis, were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available data, biological therapies appear to be safe in pregnancy. Most studies looking at the effects of any one medication on pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease are confounded by the fact that most patients are on multiple medications and have varying levels of disease activity. Stopping therapy in the third trimester should be considered. Large registries with longer follow-up periods will be necessary before firm conclusions about the safety of antitumour necrosis factor-alpha therapies during conception and pregnancy can be drawn.