The Healthy Health Care Workplace: a Competitive Advantage.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an evidence-based approach to improve health, reduce excessive medical costs, and optimize productivity for health care employees and their families. What opportunities and challenges are unique or specific to health care organizations particularly as aligned with value and competitive advantage in achieving the Quadruple Aim? RECENT FINDINGS: An integrated approach to improving health and performance is essential. The strategy includes the employer "environment" (broadly defined), health and medical care behaviors, care delivery modalities, benefits alignment, and a supportive, total health and productivity integrated data analytic capability. Epigenetics and lifestyle medicine represent a promising direction in accelerating the prevention, treatment, and reversal of common chronic disease. An integrated health and productivity approach, emerging science, and practices can accelerate health care systems' goal to improve employee health and organizational competitiveness. Additional published examples of health care specific employer experience will further advance refinement of existing models and tailoring to the medical care setting.

American College of Lifestyle Medicine Expert Consensus Statement: Lifestyle Medicine for Optimal Outcomes in Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: Identify areas of consensus on integrating lifestyle medicine (LM) into primary care to achieve optimal outcomes. METHODS: Experts in both LM and primary care followed an a priori protocol for developing consensus statements. Using an iterative, online process, panel members expressed levels of agreement with statements, resulting in classification as consensus, near consensus, or no consensus. RESULTS: The panel identified 124 candidate statements addressing: (1) Integration into Primary Care, (2) Delivery Models, (3) Provider Education, (4) Evidence-base for LM, (5) Vital Signs, (6) Treatment, (7) Resource Referral and Reimbursement, (8) Patient, Family, and Community Involvement; Shared Decision-Making, (9) Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity, and (10) Barriers to LM. After three iterations of an online Delphi survey, statement revisions, and removal of duplicative statements, 65 statements met criteria for consensus, 24 for near consensus, and 35 for no consensus. Consensus was reached on key topics that included LM being recognized as an essential component of primary care in patients of all ages, including LM as a foundational element of health professional education. CONCLUSION: The practice of LM in primary care can be strengthened by applying these statements to improve quality of care, inform policy, and identify areas for future research.

Lifestyle Medicine: Prevention, Treatment, and Reversal of Disease.

Lifestyle medicine (LM) expands the scope of preventive medicine by focusing on the promotion of healthy lifestyles while preventing, treating, and reversing the vast majority of chronic diseases caused by behaviors and environmental factors. LM focuses on six pillars-a plant-predominant eating pattern; physical movement; restorative sleep; management of stress; avoidance of risky substances; and positive social connections. Advances in LM competencies, education, certification, resources, and practice models are accelerating with a particular need and focus on underserved and most seriously impacted patients and communities. A comprehensive and integrated strategy addressing "whole person health" is emerging as a compelling framework for providers and health systems which combines a foundational commitment to prevention with a systematic approach to the actual and root causes of premature disease, disability, and death.

Mobilizing the U.S. Military's TRICARE Program for Value-Based Care: A Report From the Defense Health Board.

The U.S. Military Health System spends about $50 billion annually to provide care to 9.6 million active duty service members, retirees, and their families through its TRICARE health plans. TRICARE follows the predominant payment model in the USA-fee-for-service-although the Department of Defense (DoD) and Congress encourage and mandate a move toward alternative payment models-mainly, fee-for-value. For the next TRICARE contracts which will begin in 2023, the DoD asked its health-focused federal advisory committee, the Defense Health Board (DHB), to recommend how best to assess and prioritize leading value-based healthcare initiatives identified from private, public, and employer-based health plans. The November 2020 report, 'Modernization of the TRICARE Benefit', specifies a rubric to evaluate these value-based care initiatives not only in traditional measures of effectiveness but also in terms of the Defense Health Agency's Quadruple Aim with its focus on readiness. The goal of TRICARE's move toward value-based care is to leverage its size and focus on prevention of disease and injury to maintain the readiness of the U.S. Armed Forces in addition to delivering great outcomes and value to the DoD's nearly 10 million beneficiaries. The DHB emphasizes that TRICARE's size and focus on providing quality care at lower cost will incentivize providers to participate in the shift toward value-based care despite the potential challenges in transitioning to this system. This shift also aims to motivate other large government and private payors to accelerate the adoption of value-based care through TRICARE's example.

An Evaluation of Lifestyle Health Coaching Programs Using Trained Health Coaches and Evidence-Based Curricula at 6 Months Over 6 Years.

PURPOSE: Describe health plan member-level participation, completion, and 6-month outcomes for 5 lifestyle health coaching programs offered by an integrated delivery and financing system (IDFS) over 6 years. DESIGN: Case series study of 5 lifestyle programs with 180-day follow-up. SETTING: Large Western PA integrated delivery and financing system (IDFS) deployed multiple coaching modalities for diverse insurance-member enrolled population. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 14 591 health plan members choosing a lifestyle health coaching program. INTERVENTION: Evidence- and curriculum-based lifestyle health coaching programs delivered by 1 of 4 interactive modalities. MEASURES: A single metric was used as an overall indicator of clinical success for each program. Success measures include a ≥5% reduction of self-reported baseline weight, meeting physical activity guidelines, and 7-day point prevalence abstinence from tobacco. For stress and nutrition, where no single target measure exists, a metric was created that represented a net improvement across all key outcomes measured. ANALYSIS: The proportion of members meeting target outcomes were calculated and described across all time points and modalities. RESULTS: At 180 days, 77% of enrolled members reported reduced stress, 7% quit tobacco, 50.5% met physical activity guidelines, 65.2% improved nutrition, and 44.2% lost 5% or more of baseline weight. CONCLUSION: This evaluation describes the real-world effectiveness of evidence- and curriculum-based lifestyle improvement programs delivered by trained health coaches to a diverse health plan member population.

'Communities are attempting to tackle the crisis': a scoping review on community plans to prevent and reduce opioid-related harms.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand the implementation of multifaceted community plans to address opioid-related harms. DESIGN: Our scoping review examined the extent of the literature on community plans to prevent and reduce opioid-related harms, characterise the key components, and identify gaps. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINHAL, SocINDEX and Academic Search Primer, and three search engines for English language peer-reviewed and grey literature from the past 10 years. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible records addressed opioid-related harms or overdose, used two or more intervention approaches (eg, prevention, treatment, harm reduction, enforcement and justice), involved two or more partners and occurred in an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development country. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Qualitative thematic and quantitative analysis was conducted on the charted data. Stakeholders were engaged through fourteen interviews, three focus groups and one workshop. RESULTS: We identified 108 records that described 100 community plans in Canada and the USA; four had been evaluated. Most plans were provincially or state funded, led by public health and involved an average of seven partners. Commonly, plans used individual training to implement interventions. Actions focused on treatment and harm reduction, largely to increase access to addiction services and naloxone. Among specific groups, people in conflict with the law were addressed most frequently. Community plans typically engaged the public through in-person forums. Stakeholders identified three key implications to our findings: addressing equity and stigma-related barriers towards people with lived experience of substance use; improving data collection to facilitate evaluation; and enhancing community partnerships by involving people with lived experience of substance use. CONCLUSION: Current understanding of the implementation and context of community opioid-related plans demonstrates a need for evaluation to advance the evidence base. Partnership with people who have lived experience of substance use is underdeveloped and may strengthen responsive public health decision making.

UPMC MyHealth: managing the health and costs of U.S. healthcare workers.

BACKGROUND: Workplace wellness programs hold promise for managing the health and costs of the U.S. workforce. These programs have not been rigorously tested in healthcare worksites. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of MyHealth on the health and costs of UPMC healthcare workers. DESIGN: Five-year observational study conducted in 2013 with subgroup analyses and propensity-matched pair comparisons to more accurately interpret program effects. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: UPMC, an integrated health care delivery and financing system headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Participants included 13,627 UPMC employees who were continuously enrolled in UPMC-sponsored health insurance during the study period and demonstrated participation in MyHealth by completing a Health Risk Assessment in both 2007 and 2011, as well as 4,448 other healthcare workers employed outside of UPMC who did not participate in the program. INTERVENTION: A comprehensive wellness, prevention, and chronic disease management program that ties achievement of health and wellness requirements to receipt of an annual credit on participants' health insurance deductible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-risk levels, medical, pharmacy, and total healthcare costs, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set performance rates for prevention and chronic disease management. RESULTS: Significant improvements in health-risk status and increases in use of preventive and chronic disease management services were observed in the intervention group. Although total healthcare costs increased significantly, reductions in costs were significant for those who moved from higher- to the lowest-risk levels. The contrast differences in costs between reduced- and maintained-risk groups was also significant. Matched pair comparisons provided further evidence of program effects on observed reductions in costs and improvements in prevention, but not improvements in chronic disease management. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating incentivized health management strategies in employer-sponsored health insurance benefit designs can serve as a useful, though not sufficient, tool for managing the health and costs of the U.S. healthcare workforce.

Employer Health and Productivity Roadmap™ strategy.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Total Worker Health™ Program defines essential elements of an integrated health protection and health promotion model to improve the health, safety, and performance of employers and employees. The lack of a clear strategy to address the core drivers of poor health, excessive medical costs, and lost productivity has deterred a comprehensive, integrated, and proactive approach to meet these challenges. The Employer Health and Productivity Roadmap™, comprising six interrelated and integrated core elements, creates a framework of shared accountability for both employers and their health and productivity partners to implement and monitor actionable measures that improve health, maximize productivity, and reduce excessive costs. The strategy is most effective when linked to a financially incentivized health management program or consumer-directed health plan insurance benefit design.

Advancing aspirin utilization: a review of clinical and systems-based interventions.

Underuse of clinical preventive services (CPS) such as low-dose aspirin therapy leads to tens of thousands of preventable deaths per year. The authors examined the current literature related to delivery of CPS and then provided the results to a preventive medicine expert panel who identified best practices to improve aspirin counseling and use. An exploratory literature search was conducted in PubMed using keywords associated with preventive health interventions. The review included articles published between January 2000 and March 2009. More than 200 articles were identified for review, and 35 met inclusion criteria. Interventions that increased patient-provider contact and physician interactive educational programs were most likely to improve delivery of CPS. The expert panel recommended a prevention systems cascade of reinforcing strategies and tools to maximize appropriate aspirin use. This model emphasizes important interrelationships of clinical practice settings and how they affect aspirin use.