Renal protection: a leading mechanism for cardiovascular benefit in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Initially developed as glucose-lowering drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated to be effective agents for the risk reduction of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Subsequently, data has emerged showing a significant CV benefit in patients treated with SGLT2i regardless of diabetes status. Renal protection has been initially evaluated in CV randomized trials only as secondary endpoints; nonetheless, the positive results gained have rapidly led to the evaluation of nephroprotection as primary outcome in the CREDENCE trial. Different renal and vascular mechanisms can account for the CV and renal benefits enlightened in recent literature. As clinical guidelines rapidly evolve and the role of SGLT2i appears to become pivotal for CV, T2DM, and kidney disease management, in this review, we analyze the renal effects of SGLT2, the benefits derived from its inhibition, and how this may result in the multiple CV and renal benefits evidenced in recent clinical trials.

[Collaborative synergy in the management of diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome]. / Sinergia collaborativa nella gestione del paziente diabetico con recente sindrome coronarica acuta.

BACKGROUND: An increasing amount of evidence confirms that abnormalities in glucose metabolism are associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The in-hospital management of hyperglycemic diabetic patients with ACS is complex, and the traditional clinical-organizational approaches show a high degree of heterogeneity nationwide in Italy. METHODS: The current survey (March 2016-January 2017), carried out through the Delphi method, was focused on some management issues to verify the modalities/possibilities of resolution in daily clinical practice. In addition to the 12 members of the Board, who defined the web-based questionnaire and coordinated the various stages of the process, 66 specialists, cardiologists or diabetologists, were involved in 6 Italian Regions (Lombardy, Tuscany, Lazio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Puglia and Sicily). Three iterative rounds of evaluation of the 24 statements included in the questionnaire were scheduled. For each statement, the median evaluation value and the degree of convergence of the Panel of specialists were determined. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The final analysis reveals two key aspects with a broad convergence of opinions: (i) the need, since admission to hospital, of a close collaboration between cardiologists and diabetologists in the assistance of high-risk patients; and (ii) the opportunity of a specific diagnostic therapeutic care pathway extended to post-discharge management, where the role of the general practitioner should be adequately emphasized.

Fertilizing a Patient Engagement Ecosystem to Innovate Healthcare: Toward the First Italian Consensus Conference on Patient Engagement.

Currently we observe a gap between theory and practices of patient engagement. If both scholars and health practitioners do agree on the urgency to realize patient engagement, no shared guidelines exist so far to orient clinical practice. Despite a supportive policy context, progress to achieve greater patient engagement is patchy and slow and often concentrated at the level of policy regulation without dialoguing with practitioners from the clinical field as well as patients and families. Though individual clinicians, care teams and health organizations may be interested and deeply committed to engage patients and family members in the medical course, they may lack clarity about how to achieve this goal. This contributes to a wide "system" inertia-really difficult to be overcome-and put at risk any form of innovation in this filed. As a result, patient engagement risk today to be a buzz words, rather than a real guidance for practice. To make the field clearer, we promoted an Italian Consensus Conference on Patient Engagement (ICCPE) in order to set the ground for drafting recommendations for the provision of effective patient engagement interventions. The ICCPE will conclude in June 2017. This document reports on the preliminary phases of this process. In the paper, we advise the importance of "fertilizing a patient engagement ecosystem": an oversimplifying approach to patient engagement promotion appears the result of a common illusion. Patient "disengagement" is a symptom that needs a more holistic and complex approach to solve its underlined causes. Preliminary principles to promote a patient engagement ecosystem are provided in the paper.