Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103702, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36521349

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 0.1 % w/w Liposomal Amphotericin-B gel with 10 % w/w Povidone-Iodine and saline nasal douching in preventing revision surgery in patients with CAM. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-arm, parallel randomized control trial. STUDY SETTING: The trial was conducted in the Department of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhubaneswar. METHODS: Participants: Microbiologically and histologically proven cases of mucormycosis who underwent surgical debridement were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Postoperatively, patients were randomized into three groups based on the type of topical intervention received, in the form of Lipid-based Amphotericin B gel, povidone­iodine ointment or saline nasal douching. OUTCOME: Requirement of revision surgery in postoperative cases of CAM. RANDOMIZATION: Participants were allotted to one of the three arms by block randomization. BLINDING: Single-blinded trial. RESULTS: Numbers randomized: 15 participants were randomized to each group. Recruitment: Completed recruiting. Numbers analyzed: 15 participants were analyzed in each group. OUTCOMES: Control arm's risk of revision surgery was 4.50 (95 % CI: 1.16-17.44) times than Lipid-based Amphotericin B gel arm and 1.50 (95 % CI: 0.71-3.16) times that of the Povidone- Iodine arm. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02) for Amphotericin but not for Povidone-Iodine. CONCLUSIONS: Topical Amphotericin-B gel application in the postoperative cavity can decrease the need for revision surgery and help in early recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/10/037257. Clinical Trials Registry of India.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mucormicose , Humanos , Anfotericina B , SARS-CoV-2 , Povidona-Iodo , Mucormicose/tratamento farmacológico , Mucormicose/cirurgia , Lipídeos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(4): 1785-1791, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331590

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis (CRSwNP) is always challenging due to the chronicity of the disease and its intractable course. Posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) can be effective in alleviating symptoms of CRSwNP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital from August 2019 to April 2022. A total of 46 patients of CRSwNP were included (23 patients in the study and 23 in the control group). Patients in the study group underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and PNN and patients in the control group with ESS. The symptoms and quality-of-life improvement were assessed at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the surgery. RESULTS: On intragroup analysis between the preoperative and postoperative scores (SNOT-22, RSDI and LK Score), we found a significant difference for each (p < 0.05). When the improvement of outcome scores was compared between the two groups, a significant difference was obtained for SNOT-22 and RSDI scores at 1 week and 4 weeks (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference found for the duration of surgery/complications between the two groups (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: The PNN can be an effective add-on procedure in patients with CRSwNP in alleviating short-term control of the symptoms and the quality of life. A larger sample size with long-term follow-up may be required for a better understanding of the efficacy of the PNN in patients with CRSwNP.


Assuntos
Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/cirurgia , Rinite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/cirurgia , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Pólipos Nasais/diagnóstico , Doença Crônica , Endoscopia/métodos , Denervação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA