CLOSE protocol versus lower ablation index value for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized noninferior clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The optimized ablation index (AI) value for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains to be defined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CLOSE protocol and lower AI protocol in paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-resistant paroxysmal AF for first ablation were prospectively enrolled from September 2020 to January 2022. The patients were randomly divided into CLOSE group (AI ≥ 550 for anterior/roof segments and ≥400 for posterior/inferior segments) and lower AI group (AI ≥ 450 for anterior/roof segments and ≥350 for posterior/inferior segments). First-pass isolation, acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, 1-year arrhythmia recurrence, and major complications were assessed. Of the 270 enrolled patients, 238 completed 1-year follow-up (118 in CLOSE group and 120 in lower AI group). First-pass isolation in left PVs was higher in CLOSE group (71.2% vs. 53.3%, p = .005). Acute PV reconnections were comparable between groups (9.3% vs. 14.2%, p = .246). At 1 year, 86.4% in CLOSE group versus 81.7% in lower AI group were free from atrial arrhythmia (log rank p = .334). The proportion difference was -4.8% (95% CI: -14.1% to 4.6%), and p = .475 for noninferiority. Stroke occurred in four patients of lower AI group, and no cardiac tamponade, atrioesophageal fistula, major bleeding or death occurred post procedure. CONCLUSION: For patients with paroxysmal AF and treated by AI-guided PV ablation, lower AI is not noninferior to CLOSE protocol.

Chinese expert consensus on the construction of the fluoroless cardiac electrophysiology laboratory and related techniques.

Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation has been widely introduced for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. The demand for catheter ablation continues to grow rapidly as the level of recommendation for catheter ablation. Traditional catheter ablation is performed under the guidance of X-rays. X-rays can help display the heart contour and catheter position, but the radiobiological effects caused by ionizing radiation and the occupational injuries worn caused by medical staff wearing heavy protective equipment cannot be ignored. Three-dimensional mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography can provide detailed anatomical and electrical information during cardiac electrophysiological study and ablation procedure, and can also greatly reduce or avoid the use of X-rays. In recent years, fluoroless catheter ablation technique has been well demonstrated for most arrhythmic diseases. Several centers have reported performing procedures in a purposefully designed fluoroless electrophysiology catheterization laboratory (EP Lab) without fixed digital subtraction angiography equipment. In view of the lack of relevant standardized configurations and operating procedures, this expert task force has written this consensus statement in combination with relevant research and experience from China and abroad, with the aim of providing guidance for hospitals (institutions) and physicians intending to build a fluoroless cardiac EP Lab, implement relevant technologies, promote the standardized construction of the fluoroless cardiac EP Lab.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage occlusion for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently the most prevalent arrhythmia in clinical practice, with stroke being one of its major complications. Combining catheter ablation and percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) into a "one-stop" intervention could reduce stroke incidence in selected high-risk patients and, at the same time, relieve AF symptoms in a single procedure. This meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation combined with LAAO for nonvalvular AF. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2019 to identify relevant citations. Efficacy indexes were procedural success, AF recurrence, stroke/transient ischemic attacks (TIA), and device-related thrombus (DRT). Safety indexes were all-cause death, major hemorrhagic complications, and pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade. The incidence rate of events (ratio of events to patients) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated as summary results. A forest plot was constructed to present pooled rates. Eighteen studies (two randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included. The results showed that one-stop intervention has significant efficacy and safety, with procedural success of .98 (95% CI, .97-1.00), AF recurrence of .24 (95% CI, .15-.35), stroke/TIA of .01 (95% CI, .00-.01), DRT of .00 (95% CI, .00-.01), all-cause mortality of .00 (95% CI, .00-.00), cardiac/neurological mortality of .00 (95% CI, .00-.00), major hemorrhagic complications of .01 (95% CI, .00-.02), and pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade of .01 (95% CI, .00-.01). A single procedure with catheter ablation and LAAO in AF is a feasible strategy with significant efficacy and safety.

Meta-Analysis of Relation Between Oral ß-Blocker Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The aim of the present review was to investigate the association between the use of oral ß-blockers and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment. A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed (from inception to September 27, 2014) and Embase (Ovid SP, from 1974 to September 29, 2014) to identify studies that compared the outcome of patients with AMI taking oral ß-blockers with that of patients not taking after PCI. Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed with random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Ten observational studies with a total of 40,873 patients were included. Use of ß-blockers was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death (unadjusted relative risk 0.58, 95% confidential interval 0.48 to 0.71; adjusted hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidential interval 0.62 to 0.94). The potential benefit of ß-blockers in preventing all-cause death was not similar in all population but was restricted to those with reduced ejection fraction, with low use proportion of other secondary prevention drugs or with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The association between the use of ß-blockers and improved survival rate was significant in ≤1-year follow-up duration. Rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and heart failure readmission in patients using ß-blockers were not significantly different from those in patients without ß-blocker therapy. In conclusion, there is lack of evidence to support routine use of ß-blockers in all patients with AMI who underwent PCI. Further trials are urgently needed to address the issue.