A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We provide a systematic analysis of nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) to assess and summarize the risks and benefits of NSS in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We have undertaken a systematic search of original articles using 3 databases: Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Original articles in English containing outcomes of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk PCa were included. The primary outcomes were oncological results: the rate of positive surgical margins and biochemical relapse. The secondary outcomes were functional results: erectile function (EF) and urinary continence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The rate of positive surgical margins differed considerably, from zero to 47%. The majority of authors found no correlation between NSS and a positive surgical margin rate. The rate of biochemical relapse ranged from 9.3% to 61%. Most of the articles lacked data on odds ratio (OR) for positive margin and biochemical relapse. The presented results showed no effect of nerve sparing (NS) on positive margin (OR=0.81, 0.6-1.09) or biochemical relapse (hazard ratio [HR]=0.93, 0.52-1.64). A strong association between NSS and potency rate was observed. Without NSS, between 0% and 42% of patients were potent, with unilateral 79-80%, with bilateral - up to 90-100%. Urinary continence was not strongly associated with NSS and was relatively good in both patients with and without NSS. CONCLUSIONS: NSS may provide benefits for patients with urinary continence and significantly improves EF in high-risk patients. Moreover, it is not associated with an increased risk of relapse in short- and middle-term follow-up. However, the advantages of using such a surgical technique are unclear.

Prostatic artery embolization for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms in elderly patients unfit for surgery: Our initial experience. / Embolización arteria prostática para el manejo de la hiperplasia benigna de próstata/síndrome tracto urinario inferior en pacientes añosos no candidatos a cirugía: nuestra experiencia inicial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization in the management of LUTS secondary to BPH in elderly patients unfit for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 17 elderly patients with moderate to severe LUTS/BPH were included in the study and treated with prostatic artery embolization. The patients were evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography (to assess prostate size), IPSS, and PVR urine volume preoperatively and 6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 76.67 ± 7.69. The mean prostate volume was 139.8 ± 81.83 g. The mean preoperative IPSS and PVR were 23 ± 5.4, and 94.43 ± 88.94 ml, respectively. The mean operative time was 90 minutes. Only three patients suffered from postoperative complications (two patients suffered from urinary tract infection and one patient had partial penile necrosis). At 6 months follow up, there was a significant reduction in the prostate volume (101 ± 73.65 cc), IPSS (12.5 ± 3.65), and PVR urine volume (48.64 ± 43.55). CONCLUSION: prostatic artery embolization is a safe and effective nonsurgical alternative treatment of BPH/LUTS particularly in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia de la embolización arteria prostática en el manejo de STUI secundarios a HBP en pacientes añosos no candidatos a cirugía.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: 17 pacientes añosos con STUI moderados/severos fueron incluidos en el estudio y tratados con ambolización de la arteria prostática. Los pacientes fueron evaluados con ecografía transrectal (para determinar el tamaño prostático), IPSS, y residuo post-miccional preoperatorio y a los 6 meses del procedimiento. RESULTADOS: La edad mediana de los pacientes fue de 76,67 ± 7,69. EL volumen prostático medio fue de 139,8 ± 81,83 g. EL IPSS preoperatorio y RPM medio fueron de 23 ± 5,4, y 94,43 ± 88,94 ml, respectivamente. El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue de 90 minutos Solamente 3 pacientes tuvieron complicaciones postoperatorias (2 pacientes tuvieron una infección tracto urinario y un paciente tuvo una necrosis peneana). A los 6 meses de seguimiento, hubo una reducción significativa del volumen prostático (101 ± 73,65 cc), IPSS (12,5 ± 3,65), y RPM volumen orina (48,64 ± 43,55). CONCLUSIONES: La embolización de la arteria prostática es un procedimiento seguro y efectivo como una alternativa no quirúrgica al tratamiento de HBP/STUI particularmente en pacientes añosos con múltiples comorbilidades.

Urology Residents Simulation Training Improves Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred modality of treatment for small renal masses. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been adopted worldwide and a fundamental role is played by surgical skills. The need for skill instruction outside the operating room is well recognized in the modern models of surgery residency training. We aim to investigate the impact of residents' laparoscopic surgical skills training on the successful implementation of LPN in a reference public teaching hospital in southern Brazil. METHODS: We accessed all patients undergoing LPN by senior's urology residents at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Patients were stratified in 2 periods of time named 'LPN eras' 1 and 2, to report the training impact on the outcome. LPN era 1 was from October 2012 to February 2017 and LPN era 2 from March 2017 to June 2019. All the senior residents of LPN era 2 followed a simulation training divided into 4 years with a total training time of 244 hours before performing the LPN. Residents from LPN era 1 did not have simulation training. RESULTS: 124 patients underwent LPN during the study period, 53 (42.7%) of those were performed in LPN era 1 and 71 (57.3%) in LPN era 2. Baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups were similar. The training performed by LPN era 2 residents was able to significantly reduce estimated blood loss, ischemia time and LOS with p value respectively 0.007, 0.001 and 0.001. LPN era 2 group also reached Trifecta in 77.5% of patients, being significantly more than in the LPN era 1 (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation in residents surgical training was able to improve clinical outcomes in LPN. These data reinforce the fundamental importance of adequate residents training before performing surgery on a patient.

Technical Refinements in Superextended Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients with iT3 lesion at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently not explored. OBJECTIVE: To describe our revised RARP technique (ie, superextended RARP [SE-RARP]) for PCa patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b at MRI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 89 patients with posterior iT3a or T3b disease who underwent SE-RARP at a single high-volume centre between 2015 and 2018 were analysed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: RARP was performed using a DaVinci Xi system. The surgical approach provided an inter- or extrafascial RARP where Denonvilliers' fascia and perirectal fat were dissected free and left on the posterior surface of the seminal vesicles. MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative outcomes, and intra- and postoperative complications were assessed. Postoperative outcomes were assessed in patients with complete follow-up data (n = 78). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Urinary continence (UC) recovery was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 204 min, 300 ml, and 5 d, respectively. The median bladder catheterisation time was 5 d. Overall, 28%, 28%, and 27% of patients had pathological grade group (GG) 4-5, pT3b, and positive surgical margins (PSMs), respectively. Three patients (3.4%) experienced intraoperative complications. Among patients with available follow-up data (n = 78), 14 (18%) experienced 30-d postoperative complications. The median follow-up was 19 mo. Overall, 11 patients received additional treatment. At 2 yr of follow-up, BCR-free and additional treatment-free survival were 55% and 66%, respectively. Pathological GG 4-5 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2) and PSM (HR 5.8) were independent predictors of recurrence, as well as of additional treatment use (HR 5.6 for GG 4-5 and 5.2 for PSM). The 1-yr UC recovery was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: We presented our revised RARP technique applicable to patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b at preoperative MRI. This technique is associated with good morbidity and continence recovery rates, and might guarantee biochemical control of the disease and postpone the use of additional treatments in patients with low-grade and negative surgical margins. PATIENT SUMMARY: A revised robot-assisted radical prostatectomy technique applicable to prostate cancer patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b lesion at magnetic resonance imaging was described. This novel technique is feasible and safe in expert hands.

Non-conservative management of simple renal cysts in adults: a comprehensive review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Renal cysts are common findings in nearly 10% of general population. According to Bosniak classification, they are classified into simple and complex renal cysts based on their CT characteristics. The majority of simple renal cysts are asymptomatic and require no intervention. Once they become symptomatic or complicated, a non-conservative management should be considered. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This paper is a narrative review of existing manuscripts regarding the non-conservative management of renal cysts. To perform it a search through PubMed was carried out in January 2017. The search was conducted using the following key words: "simple renal cysts," "non-conservative management," "treatment outcomes comparison" etc. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found 1880 publications that were reviewed by 2 of our authors, and only 46 manuscripts were considered for this review. The most common treatment were investigated and compared to understand the best treatment modality in accordance with patients' and cysts' characteristics. Different treatment modalities are available for the management of simple renal cysts. Surgical exploration is a historical procedure that is no longer used. Simple aspiration without sclerotherapy has high recurrence rate (20-80%), so sclerosants agents are recommended. Ethanol is the most commonly used sclerosing agent with high efficacy up to 97%. Laparoscopy is the gold standard for management in large cysts especially in younger patients. Other techniques are described for parapelvic renal cysts like percutaneous endoscopic ablation and ureteroscopic marsupialization. CONCLUSIONS: Different factors affect the treatment decision including natural history of the cyst, presence of symptoms and/or complications and patients' choice. This literature overview shows that ethanol percutaneous sclerotherapy and laparoscopy are the most commonly reported treatment modality for simple renal cysts.