Use of 18F-FDG-PET-CT for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Children With Wilms Tumor.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-FDG-PET-CT) in the assessment of histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in children with Wilms tumors (WTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively registered 12 patients with WTs who were treated with 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. All patients underwent sequential F-FDG-PET-CT before (PET-CT1) and after (PET-CT2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured on PET-CT1 (SUV1) and PET-CT2 (SUV2). The percentage change in SUVmax (SUVmax reduction) was calculated. After surgery the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were graded histopathologically: ≥90% necrosis indicated a good response and <90% necrosis was considered a poor response. The correlation between SUVmax reduction and histologic response was estimated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Among the 12 patients who underwent PET-CT before and after chemotherapy, SUVmax reduction was significantly different between the good response group and the poor response group (P=0.035). A significant, in terms of P value, correlation was found between pathologic response and SUVmax reduction (r=0.700; 95% confidence interval, 0.060-0.935; P=0.011). A threshold of 66% reduction in SUVmax was identified, with which partition, there were 8 good histologic responders (≥66% decrease in SUVmax) and 4 poor responders. The histologic complete response rate of the good responders was 87.5%, whereas that of poor responders was 0%. SUV1≥7 and SUV2≥2.4 were both considered to be with high risk of recurrence. In patients with SUV1≥7, 4/5 cases relapsed and 4/6 patients with SUV2≥2.4 relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: As there seems to be a good correlation of changes in SUVmax and histologic response, PET-CT has the potential of predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in children with WT. SUV1 and SUV2 by themselves might be a good prognosticator of the clinical outcome of WT pediatric patients treated with International Society of Pediatric Oncology protocols, although the reduction rate of SUVmax is much less powerful for prognosis.

Bioinspired MoS2 Nanosheet-Modified Carbon Fibers for Synergetic Bacterial Elimination and Wound Disinfection.

Bacterial infection is one of the most frequent wound complications and has become a major public health concern. Increasing resistance to antibiotics has been noted with these agents broadly used in wound management. It is an urgent demand to develop alternative antibacterial strategies with a reduced chance of resistance. Herein, a Nepenthes-mimicking nanosheet array of MoS2 on carbon fibers (CF-MoS2 ) is proposed to achieve dual bactericidal activities. First, the sharp edges of synthesized surfaces are capable of inducing physical disruption of cell membranes, demonstrating mechanical antibacterial activity like their natural counterparts. Second, in the presence of near-infrared light, bioinspired CF-MoS2 nanosheets are able to cause the death of damaged bacteria owing to their inherent photothermal properties. Such dual-functional modes endow the surfaces with nearly 100% killing efficiency for highly concentrated Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Furthermore, their potential to be applied as wound dressings for photothermal treatment of infectious wounds is also investigated in vivo. Bioinspired CF-MoS2 dressings show advantages of synergistic disinfection and efficient promotion of wound regeneration. It is foreseen that this high-performance and multifunctional CF-MoS2 could afford a feasible broad-spectrum treatment for non-antibiotic disinfection.

Personalized Variable vs Fixed-Dose Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Exacerbations of COPD: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COPD exacerbations decrease treatment failure and shorten the length of hospitalization. However, the optimal dose is unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is personalized-dose corticosteroid administered according to a dosing scale more effective than fixed-dose corticosteroid administration in hospitalized patients with COPD with exacerbations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label trial. In-hospital patients with COPD with exacerbations were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the fixed-dose group (receiving the equivalent of 40 mg of prednisolone) or the personalized-dose group for 5 days. The primary end point was a composite measure of treatment failure that included in-hospital treatment failure and medium-term (postdischarge) failure. Secondary end points were length of stay and cost. RESULTS: A total of 248 patients were randomly assigned to the fixed-dose group (n = 124) or personalized-dose group (n = 124). One patient in each group was not included in the intention-to-treat population because of incorrect initial COPD diagnosis. Failure of therapy occurred in 27.6% in the personalized-dose group, compared with 48.8% in the fixed-dose group (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68; P = .001). The in-hospital failure of therapy was significantly lower in the personalized-dose group (10.6% vs 24.4%; P = .005), whereas the medium-term failure rate, adverse event rate, hospital length of stay, and costs were similar between the two groups. After treatment failure, a lower additional dose of corticosteroids and a shorter duration of treatment were needed in the personalized-dose group to achieve control of the exacerbation. In the personalized-dose cohort, those receiving 40 mg or less had an average failure rate of 44.4%, compared with 22.9% among those receiving more than 40 mg (P = .027). INTERPRETATION: Personalized dosing of corticosteroids reduces the risk of failure because more patients were provided with a higher initial dose, especially > 60 mg, whereas 40 mg or less was too low in either group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02147015; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.