[The Management of Blood Glucose Should be Emphasized in the Treatment of COVID-19].

Based on the higher mortality and the higher proportion of critically ill adults in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with diabetes, good inpatient glycemic control is particularly important in the comprehensive treatment of COVID-19. Individualized blood glucose target goals and treatment strategies should be made according to specific circumstances of COVID-19 inpatients with diabetes. For mild patients, a strict glycemic control target (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 4.4-6.1 mmol/L, 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2 h PG) 6.1-7.8 mmol/L) are recommended; a target for the glycemic control of common type patients (FPG 6.1-7.8 mmol/L, 2 h PG 7.8-10.0 mmol/L) and subcutaneous insulin deliver therapy are recommended; a target nonfasting blood glucose range of 10.0 mmol or less per liter for severe-type COVID-19 patients, a relatively Less stringent blood glucose control target (FPG 7.8-10.0 mmol/L, 2 h PG 7.8-13.9 mmol/L) for critically ill patients and intravenous insulin infusion therapy are recommended. Due to the rapid changes in the condition of some patients, the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar status (HHS) maybe occur during the treatment. Blood glucose monitoring, dynamic evaluation and timely adjustment of strategies should be strengthened to ensure patient safety and promote early recovery of patients.

[Successful Treatment of Refractory Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers by Combination Therapy of Autologous Platelet-rich Gel and Topical ß Adrenergic Receptor Blocker: a Case Report].

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 76 year-old woman with 8-year history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was admitted with gangrene of left great toe, 3rd, 4th and 5th toes. Twenty months ago, She started to receive hemodialysis due to end-stage renal disease. She did not have any history of reactive airway disease nor bradycardia that would contraindicate the use of topical beta-blocker. The X-ray of left lower limb and foot showed calcification of left superficial femoral artery, popliteal artery, anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery, dorsal foot artery and digital artery, as well as osteolytic destruction at distal end of metatarsal bone, and lateral dislocation of the 4th and 5th toes. Color Doppler ultrasound of bilateral lower extremity arteries showed obvious calcification of bilateral superficial femoral arteries, thrombosis of left popliteal artery, severe stenosis of left anterior tibial artery, occlusion of left posterior tibial artery, right anterior tibial artery and posterior tibial artery. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of bilateral lower limb arteries revealed moderate stenosis of left superficial femoral artery, occlusion of left popliteal artery, left posterior tibial artery and dorsal pedal artery, occulusion of right posterior tibial artery, but right dorsal pedal artery was visible. DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP: Diagnosis of diabetic foot (left, grade 4) and diabetic lower extremity arterial occlusion (left, stage 4) was made. Based on multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion, the patient was unable to undergo vascular bypass surgery, and left lower extermity amputation also was not suitable because of right atrial thrombosis. Therefore, conservative treatment was recommended. The specific scheme used clopidogrel for antiplatelet agglutination, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (Clexane) and warfarin for anticoagulation, lipo-alprostadil for vasodilation, as well as local debridement and ultrasonic debridement. The treatments were given for up to 9 weeks, but with no significant clinical response. So the patient was treated with vacuum-assisted closure and autologous platelet-rich gel therapy for the next 7 weeks, then applied with 1 drop of timolol maleate 0.5% ophthalmic solution per cm 2 wound area every other day for another 6 weeks, the wound rapidly healed and re-epithelialized basically. The follow-up for 5 weeks showed that the wound healed completely without any discomfort. No side effect was found.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about Hyperuricemia and Gout in Community Health Workers and Patients with Diabetes.

Hyperuricemia exhibits a high incidence among individuals with diabetes; however, the significance of hyperuricemia and gout is often underestimated. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of hyperuricemia and gout among community health workers and patients with diabetes. Two questionnaires were designed to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices of hyperuricemia and gout among community health workers and patients with diabetes in Chenghua District, Chengdu, from August 2021 to January 2022. A total of 709 community health workers were included, whose average score was 17.74/30. Approximately half of general practitioners (GPs) demonstrated knowledge regarding the target serum uric acid levels for hyperuricemia and gout. Only 11.2% of GPs were fully aware of the preferred medicine for acute gout. The majority of GPs (86.7%) demonstrated limited awareness regarding the contraindications associated with colchicine, while a significant proportion (65.1%) lacked knowledge about the specific classes of drugs that inhibit uric acid synthesis. Among the 508 patients with diabetes included in this survey, 32.3% demonstrated awareness of hyperuricemia, while 60.8% exhibited knowledge regarding gout. The average score attained by these individuals was recorded at 7.21 out of a total of 26 points. The majority of patients with diabetes (87.8%) held the mistaken belief that hyperuricemia definitely led to the development of gout. Almost 66% agreed that a massage or a hot compress could be used when acute gouty arthritis attacks. The knowledge rate of hyperuricemia and gout among community health workers was moderate, while it was low in patients with diabetes.

[The importance of multidisciplinary foot-care services in the management of diabetic patients with peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers].

Diabetic peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers are leading causes of hospitalization, for patients with diabetes mellitus, and also are the most important causes of amputation of the lower extremity in those patients, which contribute to the increased mortality and cardiovascular death. The incidence of diabetic peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers shows increasing trend. Diabetic peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers can be successfully treated only by the multidisciplinary foot-care services which provide more comprehensive and integrated care as compared to ordinary medical team or single specialist. Multidisciplinary foot-care services are provided by the team consist of: diabetologist, diabetes nurse, vascular surgeon, general surgeon, orthopedist, orthopaedic surgeon, podiatrist and orthotist, interventional radiologist and a radiology coordinator, microbiologist, psychologist, educators, shoemaker and rehabilitation team. Contrary to developed countries, multidisciplinary foot-care team has not been constructed in most centres in China. Diabetic education, appropriate foot care, early detection of risk factors of foot ulcers and early intervention are key components in the overall management of diabetic foot disorders and have assumed important roles in programs focused on amputation prevention. Prompt and aggressive treatments of diabetic peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers can often prevent an exacerbation of the problem and the potential need for amputation, which include correction of biomechanical abnormalities, infection control, serial debridement of ulcers, peripheral revascularization and wound coverage, etc. It is very important to construct a multidisciplinary diabetic foot care team to more effectively improve the survival and prognosis of patients with diabetic peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers with comprehensive treatments.

Efficacy and safety of metformin and sitagliptin based triple antihyperglycemic therapy (STRATEGY): a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Despite the current guideline's recommendation of a timely stepwise intensification therapy, the "clinical inertia", termed as the delayed treatment intensification, commonly exists in the real world, which may be partly due to the relatively little substantial evidence and no clear consensus regarding the efficacy and safety of triple oral agents in patients inadequately controlled with dual therapy. In this clinical trial performed in 237 centers in China, 5,535 type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by previous therapies were treated with a stable metformin/sitagliptin dual therapy for 20 weeks. The patients who did not reach the glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goal were then further randomized into glimepiride, gliclazide, repaglinide, or acarbose group for an additional 24-week triple therapy. A mean HbA1c reduction of 0.85% was observed when sitagliptin was added to the patients inadequately controlled with metformin in 16 weeks. Further HbA1c reductions in the 24-week triple therapy stage were 0.65% in glimepiride group, 0.70% in gliclazide group, 0.61% in repaglinide group, and 0.45% in acarbose group. The non-inferiority criterion for primary hypotheses was met for gliclazide and repaglinide, but not for acarbose, compared with glimepiride, when added to metformin/sitagliptin dual therapy. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 29.2% in the dual therapy stage and 30.3% in the triple therapy stage. Metformin/sitagliptin as baseline therapy, with the addition of a third oral antihyperglycemic agent, including glimepiride, gliclazide, repaglinide, or acarbose, was effective, safe and well-tolerated for achieving an HbA1c <7.0% goal in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with previous therapies. The timely augmentation of up to three oral antihyperglycemic agents is valid and of important clinical benefit to prevent patients from exposure to unnecessarily prolonged hyperglycemia.