[Self-help measures as determinants of emergency department utilization among people with and without a migration history in Germany]. / Selbsthilfemaßnahmen als Determinanten der Inanspruchnahme einer Notfallambulanz bei Menschen mit und ohne Migrationsgeschichte in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed whether there were differences between people with and without migration history in their implementation of self-help measures before they accessed the services of an emergency department and if there was an association between self-help measures and an appropriate utilization of emergency departments. METHODS: The data basis of this secondary analysis is the EUMaR study, which was conducted from July 2018 to July 2019 and aimed to identify causes contributing to inappropriate and frequent use of emergency departments by migrants. Our study aimed to analyze the differences in self-help measures carried out by the population groups using several multiple logistic regressions. The association between self-help measures implemented and appropriate emergency department utilization was quantified using a multiple logistic regression as well as interactions. RESULTS: The odds of first-generation migrants visiting an emergency department on their own initiative (OR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61) was high compared to people without migrant history. Furthermore, the odds of their doing something by themselves against their complaints (OR=0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86) were low. The odds of appropriate utilization of emergency services by respondents who self-initiated a visit to an emergency department were lower (OR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.34-0.50). The odds of appropriate utilization of emergency department services by respondents who had previously measured vital signs (e. g., blood pressure) were higher (OR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59). CONCLUSION: Barriers to the health care system as well as to general practitioners, medicines or medical aids among first-generation migrants could explain the increased odds of their visiting an emergency department on their own and the lower odds of their doing something by themselves about their complaints. A hypothesis of our study is that measuring vital signs may help to better assess individual health status.

[Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic: Are there risk groups for reduced subjective well-being after the first lockdown?] / Folgen der COVID-19-Pandemie: Gibt es Risikogruppen für ein verringertes subjektives Wohlbefinden nach dem ersten Lockdown?

BACKGROUND: Measures to contain COVID-19 have created burdens that have widened health inequalities. We examine the extent to which risk groups for reduced subjective well-being can be identified after the 2020 lockdown. In doing so, we also consider possible interactions of different social grouping characteristics as part of an intersectional approach. METHOD: Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) data from the years 2018-2020 were analyzed. A total of 16,000 cases with information on changes in well-being (SF-12 scores and individual indicators) were included in the analyses. We use the classification method "random forests" to identify groups with different trends in well-being. For the interpretation of the content, we also present results from a regression model with social and health aspects as predictors. RESULTS: Demographic and social characteristics explained only a very small part of the changes in subjective well-being (R2 = 0.007-0.012) and did not allow for the differentiation of homogeneous risk groups. Although some significant predictors were found in the regression models, the corresponding effects were mostly small. In addition to the initial state of well-being before the pandemic began, the presence of chronic illnesses and disabilities in particular contributed to the explanation of subjective well-being. DISCUSSION: The currently available data do not allow a clear identification of risk groups for losses in well-being in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health status before the onset of the pandemic appears to be more important for short-term changes in subjective well-being than socio-demographic and socio-economic categorization characteristics.

[A guideline on discrimination-sensitive language in research on migration and health]. / Diskriminierungssensible Sprache in der Forschung zu Migration und Gesundheit ­ eine Handreichung.

BACKGROUND: Public health research has increasingly focused on migration as a determinant of health. Responsible research in this area requires an anti-discriminatory approach in its conduct, reporting and dissemination. A discrimination-sensitive use of language is a central element. Guidelines in this regard do not yet exist for the field of public health in German-speaking countries. METHODS: Within the framework of the project Improving Health Monitoring in Migrant Populations (IMIRA) at the Robert Koch Institute, a guideline on anti-discriminatory language in research on migration and health was developed. It consists of a manual and an overview of relevant terms and concepts. The needs, content and form of the guideline were developed in an action research process with project staff from the IMIRA project. RESULTS: The manual shows the following five basic principles for anti-discriminatory language use: (1) avoid generalisations, (2) formulate in a discrimination-sensitive way, (3) use self-designations and external designations, (4) recognise that terms are subject to constant change and (5) openly communicate one's own uncertainties. The overview, which is available online as a "living document", contains terms and concepts that are frequently used in association with the topic of migration. CONCLUSION: The guideline is intended to support researchers in using language in an anti-discriminatory way. This goes hand in hand with a reflection on one's own language use and strengthens responsible research on the topic of migration and health.

Un regard théorique sur l'intégrité à la naissance : médicalisation, théories du risque, embodiment et intersectionnalité.

INTRODUCTION: Recent quantitative research in public health indicates that women across the globe report suboptimal treatment during institutional deliveries. The most common approaches used to comprehend this abuse, violence, or mistreatment have not fully achieved a balance between theoretical perspectives and empirical assessment. To contribute to a more accurate account of the cultural driving forces, institutional conditions, direct expressions, and individual perceptions that undermine or preserve what we define as “integrity at birth”, we develop a new theoretical approach and a multi-level model. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: We ground the terminology for integrity at birth upon theoretical foundations, referring to two theoretical discourses: medicalization and risk theory on the one hand, and embodiment and intersectionality theory on the other. We then contextualize this in a multi-level model in order to operationalize its potential for public health research. RESULTS: The concept and model of “integrity at birth” recognize that women in labor suffer from a number of gender-specific violations, which can be expressed at all levels (macro to micro) as implicit, inherent, normalized and invisible, or explicit, intentional, visible and socially accepted. In distinguishing six separate domains, we propose a theoretical contribution for obstetric care practices. CONCLUSION: Integrity at birth, as a multi-level and theoretically grounded approach, constitutes an important step towards raising awareness about this issue beyond the dimensions that have been studied to date in quantitative health research. Beyond available evidence of disrespectful and abusive practices constituting violations to integrity at birth, this study takes a step towards understanding gender-based violence and inequalities of health at childbirth.

Public health-relevant consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented challenges to health systems worldwide, including the control of non-COVID-19 diseases. Malaria cases and deaths may increase due to the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic in malaria-endemic countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This scoping review aims to summarize information on public health-relevant effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the malaria situation in SSA. METHODS: Review of publications and manuscripts on preprint servers, in peer-reviewed journals and in grey literature documents from 1 December, 2019 to 9 June, 2021. A structured search was conducted on different databases using predefined eligibility criteria for the selection of articles. RESULTS: A total of 51 papers have been included in the analysis. Modelling papers have predicted a significant increase in malaria cases and malaria deaths in SSA due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many papers provided potential explanations for expected COVID-19 effects on the malaria burden; these ranged from relevant diagnostical and clinical aspects to reduced access to health care services, impaired availability of curative and preventive commodities and medications, and effects on malaria prevention campaigns. Compared to previous years, fewer country reports provided data on the actual number of malaria cases and deaths in 2020, with mixed results. While highly endemic countries reported evidence of decreased malaria cases in health facilities, low endemic countries reported overall higher numbers of malaria cases and deaths in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this review provide evidence for a significant but diverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria in SSA. There is the need to further investigate the public health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the malaria burden. Protocol registered on Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/STQ9D.

[Covid-19 in Refugee Shelters: The German Public Health Service Needs Strengthening Now]. / Covid-19 in Flüchtlingsunterkünften: ÖGD jetzt weiter stärken.

The Covid-19 pandemic poses a major challenge for the management of collective accommodation centres for refugees. The often-overcrowded facilities hinder satisfactory implementation of social distancing and hygiene practices. Adequate information policies as well as a rapid, efficient management of suspected and confirmed Covid-19 cases are essential. However, scientific evidence on this is largely lacking. Besides partially implemented approaches, such as isolation areas or cluster quarantine, plans to evacuate overcrowded facilities should also be considered. The German Public Health Service (ÖGD) plays a vital role in the current Covid-19 pandemic. In order to fulfil their routine tasks of infection control and support health services management for refugee accommodation centres, the ÖGD urgently needs to be strengthened in terms of personnel and material. Additionally, means for a rapid exchange of best practice examples of Covid-19 interventions across federal states as well as collaborative structures and capacity within the ÖGD for accompanying operational research are needed. Refugees, their housing situation and their access to health care need to be included in pandemic plans. Only an integrative health care system can achieve regional and international targets for the control of Covid-19 and other infectious diseases.

[Utilization of medical rehabilitation prior to disability retirement : Comparison of German and non-German nationals with a special focus on ethnic German resettlers]. / Inanspruchnahme medizinischer Rehabilitation im Vorfeld der Erwerbsminderungsrente : Vergleich ausländischer und deutscher Staatsangehöriger unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von (Spät­)Aussiedler/­innen.

BACKGROUND: So far little is known about the utilization of medical rehabilitation among non-German nationals and ethnic German resettlers. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the utilization of medical rehabilitation in non-German nationals and ethnic German resettlers prior to disability retirement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Routine data from the German statutory pension insurance scheme were used. Information on 17,369 individuals who retired due to disability in 2015 was available. Ethnic German resettlers were defined by means of information stemming from a prior occupation in the country of origin. The outcome of interest was the utilization of medical rehabilitation in the past 5 years prior to the disability pension. Multilevel logistic regression was used to control the influence of demographic and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Compared to Germans without resettler status, non-German nationals had a lower chance of utilizing medical rehabilitation. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 0.79 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.67-0.92) for Turkish nationals and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.45-0.71) for nationals from EU countries. Ethnic German resettlers had a higher chance of utilizing medical rehabilitation (adjusted OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.20-1.64). CONCLUSION: Non-German nationals utilized medical rehabilitation prior to disability retirement less frequently than German nationals. This is presumably because of the barriers non-Germans experience in utilization, resulting from poor information and problems emerging in the transition from general practitioner to rehabilitative care. Ethnic German resettlers do not seem to be disadvantaged in terms of access to rehabilitation.

Germany's expanding role in global health.

Germany has become a visible actor in global health in the past 10 years. In this Series paper, we describe how this development complements a broad change in perspective in German foreign policy. Catalysts for this shift have been strong governmental leadership, opportunities through G7 and G20 presidencies, and Germany's involvement in managing the Ebola virus disease outbreak. German global health engagement has four main characteristics that are congruent with the health agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals; it is rooted in human rights, multilateralism, the Bismarck model of social protection, and a link between development and investment on the basis of its own development trajectory after World War 2. The combination of momentum and specific characteristics makes Germany well equipped to become a leader in global health, yet the country needs to accept additional financial responsibility for global health, expand its domestic global health competencies, reduce fragmentation of global health policy making, and solve major incoherencies in its policies both nationally and internationally.

[Global Health Comprises More than Health Security: Discussion]. / Globale Gesundheitspolitik ist mehr als Gefahrenabwehr.

Global health is increasingly present on the international policy agenda and in transnational fora such as the G7 and G20 summits. This trend is as overdue as it is desirable, but the scope and content of the discussion remain rather limited. For safeguarding and improving people's health all over the world, global public health requires coordinated and coherent action. Epidemic preparedness is certainly necessary but refers only to a small segment of global health and will remain insufficient as long as the social and health-system-related causes persist. "One Health" is an important strategy for fighting antimicrobial resistance but without overcoming crucial economic determinants, it will be impossible to solve the problem. Health systems strengthening, the third major field of global health, requires a sound mix of adequate financing, infrastructure, human resources and societal factors for expanding access to health for all. All proposed and desired improvements in global health need complex crosscutting approaches for being effective and sustainable; however, the steps taken by political decision-makers are rather small and do not address essential causes. Global public health means more than tinkering with the symptoms.

[Global Public Health - Results of the Working Group 3 of the Forum Future Public Health, Berlin 2016]. / Globalisierung und Public Health.

In the age of globalization, few health issues remain "local". For example, neither infectious diseases nor climate change stop at national borders, and hence cannot be controlled only within the nation state. The same applies to smoking and nutritional behaviors that affect health and are influenced by multinational companies and transnational policies. Therefore, public health needs to develop strategies and interventions that are not restricted to the nation state alone. This also applies to public health in Germany that needs a stronger global health perspective.

[Migrant-sensitive health care strategies in orthopedic rehabilitation : A postal survey in North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein]. / Migrationssensible Versorgungsstrategien in der orthopädischen Rehabilitation : Eine postalische Befragung in Nordrhein-Westfalen und Schleswig-Holstein.

BACKGROUND: Migrants utilize rehabilitative care less frequently than the majority population in Germany. They also have less favorable treatment outcomes. Little is known about migrant-sensitive measures implemented by rehabilitation hospitals in order to provide a more patient-centered health care for this population group. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to examine which measures of migrant-sensitive health care are used by rehabilitation hospitals in North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein and to identify potential barriers that may affect the implementation of such measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We surveyed the administrative and medical management of all 122 orthopedic rehabilitation hospitals in North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein by means of a postal questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised, amongst others, questions on the implementation of migrant-sensitive measures in accommodation and health care provision. After one postal reminder, a total of 55 hospitals responded to the survey. RESULTS: Of the hospitals surveyed, 83.6% consider migrant-sensitive health care to be important or partially important. Only a few migrant-sensitive measures are employed by hospitals. Thirty percent of all hospitals do not use measures of migrant-sensitive health care at all. Perceived barriers preventing an implementation of these measures are limited financial resources (71.0%) as well as structural (32.7%) and organizational (38.2%) problems. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation hospitals are willing to implement measures of migrant-sensitive health care. Structural and organizational support is necessary in order to overcome existing implementation barriers. In addition, measures need to be cost-effective.

[Accessibility and quality of rehabilitative services among migrants in Germany]. / Erreichbarkeit und Ergebnisqualität rehabilitativer Versorgung bei Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund.

BACKGROUND: Migrants comprise a large proportion of the population in Germany. As compared to non-migrants they are at a higher risk with respect tor occupational accidents, occupational diseases and early retirement due to disability. Tertiary preventive services such as rehabilitation, consequently, are of high relevance for this population group. OBJECTIVES: We provide an overview of the accessibility and quality of preventive services among migrants residing in Germany using medical rehabilitation (tertiary prevention) as an example. We also present strategies which aim to improve health care for this population group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summary of quantitative routine data analyses and of qualitative interviews with patients and health care professionals in rehabilitative care. RESULTS: Migrants utilize rehabilitative health care services less often than non-migrants. Those who undergo medical rehabilitation report a lower satisfaction with health care and show less favorable health outcomes than non-migrants. This, for instance, becomes evident in the occupational performance and subjective treatment outcome after rehabilitation. Socioeconomic, sociodemographic and health factors only partially explain these associations. In addition, there is evidence that migrants face various barriers which affect the accessibility and quality of health care services. CONCLUSIONS: Health care institutions have to provide services which are more sensitive to the heterogeneity of the population in order to reduce barriers in health care. Diversity management can contribute to this goal.

Polio-philanthropy in Africa: A narrative review.

Background and Aim: Polio eradication efforts including polio-philanthropy have been coordinated and sustained since 1988, with the introduction of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI). The polio fight is sustained in the name of evidence-based benevolence or beneficent philanthropy from which Africa has benefited immensely. With the recorded polio cases as of 2023, more efforts and funds are required to eradicate polio. Hence, it is not yet "Uhuru." Using the Mertonian lens, this study examines polio-philanthropy in Africa, its unintended consequences, and crucial dilemmas, which could impact the polio fight and polio-philanthropy. Methods: This is a narrative review that relies on secondary sources obtained through a thorough literature search. Only studies published in English were utilized. The study synthesized relevant literature in line with the study objective. The following databases were consulted: PubMed, philosopher's index, web of knowledge, Google Scholar, and Sociological Abstracts. Both empirical and theoretical studies were utilized for the study. Results: Despite significant achievements, the global initiative has shortcomings when examined through the Mertonian lens of manifest and latent functions. The GPEI sets a unilinear goal within multiple challenges. The activities of the philanthropic giants manifest in disempowering rigor, multisectoral neglect, and parallel (health) systems, sometimes, inimical to the national health system. Most philanthropic giants often operate vertically. It is observed that, apart from funding, the last phase of polio-philanthropy will be defined by some crucial factors, the 4Cs: Communicable disease outbreaks, Conflict, Climate-related disasters, and Conspiracy theory, which could impact the prevalence or resurgence of polio. Conclusion: The polio fight will benefit from the persistent drive to reach the finish line as scheduled. The latent consequences or dysfunctions are general lessons for GPEI and other global health initiatives. Therefore, decision-makers should calculate the net balance of consequences within global health philanthropy for appropriate mitigation.

Global health and health security - conflicting concepts for achieving stability through health?

Global health has become fashionable and an important topic on the international policy agenda. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, cross-border infectious diseases had provoked a great deal of media and public interest, academic research and foreign-policy agendas. This paper analyses the relevance of health security in global health. It stresses global health as an explicitly political concept taking into consideration existing inequalities and power asymmetries. Global health represents the necessary evolution of public health in the face of ubiquitous global challenges and the growing number of international players. Some of them tend to divert global health towards technification, marketisation and privatisation, promoting biomedical reductionism and predominantly technological solutions. Overall, the current global health concept fails to adequately consider the global burden of disease, which is largely determined by non-communicable conditions. Global health goes beyond preventing infectious diseases and health security and must first and foremost focus on the social, economic, ecologic and political determination of health, which interacts with non-communicable and communicable diseases, turning them into syndemics. Health-in-all policies in a global perspective are required for sustainably reducing health inequalities within and between countries, instead of primarily focusing on security and safeguarding the status quo in a changing world.