Early supportive medication use and end-of-life care among Medicare beneficiaries with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A randomized controlled trial of cancer patients has linked early supportive care with improved hospice use and less-aggressive end-of-life care. In practice, the early use of supportive interventions and potential impact on end-of-life care are poorly understood. We sought to describe early use of medications to treat common breast cancer symptoms (pain, insomnia, anxiety, and depression) and to assess the relationship between early use of these treatments and end-of-life care. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 2006-2012 SEER-Medicare data was performed. Women included had stage IV breast cancer and died within the observation period. We used modified Poisson regression to assess the relationship between supportive medication use in the 90 days post-diagnosis and several end-of-life care measures (hospice use, in-hospital death, chemotherapy receipt within 14 days of death, ICU admission, or >1 hospitalization or emergency department/ED visit 30 days before death). RESULTS: Among the 947 women included, 68 % of women used at least one supportive medication in the 90 days following their diagnosis: 60.3 % used opioid pain medications and 28.3 % received non-opioid psychotropic medications. Early use of any supportive medications was not associated with end-of-life care. Similarly, we found no differences in end-of-life care between opioid pain medication users and non-users. However, we found that non-opioid psychotropic medication users were less likely to receive chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life (aRR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.12-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Non-opioid psychotropic use was associated with some aspects of end-of-life care. Future research should consider alternative measures of palliative and supportive care use using administrative data sources.

Pre-Post Evaluation of Collaborative Oncology Palliative Care for Patients With Stage IV Cancer.

CONTEXT: The Collaborative Care Model improves care processes and outcomes but has never been tested for palliative care. OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a model of collaborative oncology palliative care for Stage IV cancer. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post evaluation of Collaborative Oncology Palliative Care (CO-Pal), enrolling patients with Stage IV lung, breast or genitourinary cancers and acute illness hospitalization. CO-Pal has 4 components: 1) oncologist communication skills training; 2) patient tracking; 3) palliative care needs assessment; and 4) care coordination stratified by high vs. low palliative care need. Health record reviews from hospital admission through 60 days provided data on outcomes - goals-of-care discussions (primary outcome), advance care planning, symptom treatment, specialty palliative care and hospice use, and hospital transfers. RESULTS: We enrolled 256 patients (n = 114 pre and n = 142 post-intervention); 60-day mortality was 32%. Comparing patients pre vs post-intervention, CO-Pal did not increase overall goals-of-care discussions, but did increase advance care planning (48% vs 63%, P = 0.021) and hospice use (19% vs 31%, P = 0.034). CO-Pal did not impact symptom treatment, overall treatment plans, or 60-day hospital transfers. During the intervention phase, high-need vs low-need patients had more goals-of-care discussions (60% vs. 15%, P < 0.001) and more use of specialty palliative care (64% vs 22%, P < 0.001) and hospice (44% vs 16%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Collaborative oncology palliative care is efficient and feasible. While it did not increase overall goals-of-care discussions, it was effective to increase overall advance care planning and hospice use for patients with Stage IV cancer.

Development of an Art of Oncology Curriculum to Mitigate Burnout and Foster Solidarity Among Hematology/Oncology Fellows.

PURPOSE: Oncologists and fellows in hematology/oncology (HO) training programs report high levels of burnout. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires accredited programs to have a mechanism to foster well-being among fellows. METHODS: Through an iterative process involving a multidisciplinary committee, we created a 3-year longitudinal Art of Oncology (AOO) curriculum intended to address burnout and foster solidary among HO fellows. Sessions used narratives to promote the formation of a shared mental model through discussion of the mutual experience of caring for patients with cancer. We tested the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of implementing the curriculum into traditional didactic lectures as a pilot intervention from 2018 to 2019. Eight sessions were completed. RESULTS: Sixteen fellows participated. Most were married (63%) and planned on pursuing careers in academic medicine (75%). The sample was racially and ethnically diverse (31% minority representation). Thirty-eight percent of fellows reported burnout symptoms. AOO sessions had higher attendance than didactic lectures (P = .04). Of 14 fellows who completed all follow-up assessments (87.5% response rate), 93% (13 of 14 fellows) felt the sessions were very or somewhat helpful and that sessions improved solidarity. Preparedness in managing work-life balance significantly improved (paired t test, mean difference, 0.53; P = .04). Measured levels of burnout did not significantly improve from baseline (mean difference, -0.133; P = .67). Work-life balance was associated with burnout on multivariable analysis (coefficient, 0.40; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a dedicated AOO curriculum is feasible and viewed as helpful by HO fellows. Larger studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this curricular intervention.

Outcomes and satisfaction after delivery of a breast cancer survivorship care plan: results of a multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been suggested to reduce fragmentation of care experienced by cancer survivors. Acceptance of SCPs is high, but trials in the United States are few. This pilot study used a quasiexperimental design to examine the outcomes achieved by breast cancer survivors receiving a standardized SCP visit at one of seven comprehensive cancer centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcomes were assessed before and again 3 months after delivery of an SCP and included survivors' use of and satisfaction with SCPs, perceived knowledge about survivorship, and assessment of the quality and coordination of survivorship care. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine survivors of breast cancer completed baseline and follow-up measures and received a standardized SCP visit. Participants most commonly used SCP materials to make decisions about exercise (64%), which tests to receive and when (62%), and dietary changes (62%). Only 21% shared the SCP with their primary care provider during that time. Satisfaction with the SCP was high, with 90% of participants reporting being at least satisfied with the SCP. Perceived knowledge about survivorship improved after SCP delivery, as did perceived care coordination and the provider's knowledge of the effects of cancer on survivors (all P < .001). Individuals closer to the time of diagnosis reported greater satisfaction with and use of SCPs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates improvements in perceived knowledge and quality of survivorship care after receipt of a comprehensive SCP. Survivors were satisfied with their SCP, and those closer to diagnosis reported greater satisfaction with and use of the materials.