The key role of levator ani thickness for early urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Urinary continence (UC) recovery dramatically affects quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Membranous urethral length (MUL) has been the most studied anatomical variable associated with UC recovery. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether levator ani thickness (LAT), assessed with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), correlates with UC recovery after RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 209 patients treated with RARP by expert surgeons with extensive robotic experience from 2017 to 2019. All patients had complete, clinical, mpMRI, pathological, and postoperative data including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) protocols. INTERVENTION: After a radiologist-specific training, two urologists independently examined the files, blinded to clinical and pathological findings as well as to postoperative continence status. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: On mpMRI, LAT, bladder neck (BN) shape, MUL, and apex overlapping (AO) were measured. UC recovery was defined as use of 0 or 1 safety pad at follow-up. Multivariable models were used to assess the association between variables and UC recovery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 173 (82.8%) patients were continent after a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 17-28). Of these, 98 (46.9%) recovered within 3 months after surgery, 42 (20.1%) from 3 to 6 months, and 33 (15.8%) from 6 months onwards. A significant higher rate of patients with LAT > 10 mm (88.1 vs.75.8%; p = 0.03) experienced UC recovery, compared to those with LAT < 10 mm. This difference was observed in the first 3 months after surgery. At multivariable analysis, LAT (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.37; p = 0.02), Preoperative ICIQ score (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, p = 0.03) and PFMT (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.01-3.93; p = 0.04) independently predict higher UC recovery within 3 months, after accounting for age, BMI, preoperative PSA, D'Amico risk group, MUL, BN shape and AO. CONCLUSIONS: LAT greater than 1 cm was associated with greater UC recovery. Specifically, LAT greater than 1 cm seems to be associated with higher UC rate at 3 months after RARP, compared to those with LAT < 1 cm. PATIENT SUMMARY: Magnetic resonance features can help in predicting the risk of incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and should be taken into account when counseling patients before surgery.

How to improve outcome in nephron-sparing surgery: the impact of new techniques.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy is the state of the art for localized small renal mass and it is gaining attention also for more advanced cases. In the present narrative review, we discuss the new developments that have occurred in the advancement of this approach over the past few years. RECENT FINDINGS: Off-clamp, selective/superselective clamp and early-unclamping techniques are safe and feasible approaches, with potentially superior functional outcomes, and noninferior complications rate and oncological outcomes, when compared with main artery clamping. Renorrhaphy must preserve the physiological vascularization of residual parenchyma. Running sutures, particularly using barbed wires, shorten the operating and ischemia times. A further advantage could derive from avoiding a double-layer suture. Transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and retroperitoneal RAPN can be considered equivalent in terms of perioperative morbidity, functional and oncologic outcomes, regardless of tumor's location, thus the choice of the approach should be driven by the surgeon's expertise. Future improvements should be introduced by the single-port robotic surgery, which seems to be safe and feasibly also in an off-clamp manner. SUMMARY: Significant advances have recently been achieved in nephron-sparing surgery technique. However, future studies with standardized reporting of these new techniques are needed to assess the real impact of them on early and long-term functional outcomes.

Technical Refinements in Superextended Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients with iT3 lesion at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently not explored. OBJECTIVE: To describe our revised RARP technique (ie, superextended RARP [SE-RARP]) for PCa patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b at MRI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 89 patients with posterior iT3a or T3b disease who underwent SE-RARP at a single high-volume centre between 2015 and 2018 were analysed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: RARP was performed using a DaVinci Xi system. The surgical approach provided an inter- or extrafascial RARP where Denonvilliers' fascia and perirectal fat were dissected free and left on the posterior surface of the seminal vesicles. MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative outcomes, and intra- and postoperative complications were assessed. Postoperative outcomes were assessed in patients with complete follow-up data (n = 78). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Urinary continence (UC) recovery was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 204 min, 300 ml, and 5 d, respectively. The median bladder catheterisation time was 5 d. Overall, 28%, 28%, and 27% of patients had pathological grade group (GG) 4-5, pT3b, and positive surgical margins (PSMs), respectively. Three patients (3.4%) experienced intraoperative complications. Among patients with available follow-up data (n = 78), 14 (18%) experienced 30-d postoperative complications. The median follow-up was 19 mo. Overall, 11 patients received additional treatment. At 2 yr of follow-up, BCR-free and additional treatment-free survival were 55% and 66%, respectively. Pathological GG 4-5 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2) and PSM (HR 5.8) were independent predictors of recurrence, as well as of additional treatment use (HR 5.6 for GG 4-5 and 5.2 for PSM). The 1-yr UC recovery was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: We presented our revised RARP technique applicable to patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b at preoperative MRI. This technique is associated with good morbidity and continence recovery rates, and might guarantee biochemical control of the disease and postpone the use of additional treatments in patients with low-grade and negative surgical margins. PATIENT SUMMARY: A revised robot-assisted radical prostatectomy technique applicable to prostate cancer patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b lesion at magnetic resonance imaging was described. This novel technique is feasible and safe in expert hands.