Impact of safer supply programs on injection practices: client and provider experiences in Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Fentanyl has contributed to a sharp rise in the toxicity of the unregulated drug supply and fatal overdoses in Canada. It has also changed injection practices. Injection frequency has increased as a result and so has equipment sharing and health-related risks. The aim of this analysis was to explore the impact of safer supply programs on injection practices from the perspective of clients and providers in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The data set included qualitative interviews with 52 clients and 21 providers that were conducted between February and October 2021 across four safer supply programs. Interview excerpts discussing injection practices were extracted, screened, coded and then grouped into themes. RESULTS: We identified three themes, each theme corresponding to a change in injection practices. The first change was a decrease in the amount of fentanyl used and a decrease in injection frequency. The second change involved switching to injecting hydromorphone tablets instead of fentanyl. Finally, the third change was stopping injecting altogether and taking safer supply medications orally. CONCLUSION: Safer supply programs can contribute to reducing injection-related health risks in addition to overdose risks. More specifically, they have the potential to address disease prevention and health promotion gaps that stand-alone downstream harm reduction interventions cannot address, by working upstream and providing a safer alternative to fentanyl.

Community reinforcement approach (CRA) supported with structured recreation therapy: Experiences of people living with HIV in a pilot substance use treatment program at a specialty hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Community reinforcement approach (CRA) is a behavioral intervention that has demonstrated favorable treatment outcomes for individuals with substance use disorders across studies. CRA focuses on abstinence; however, abstinence is not a desired goal among all people who use substances. Previous research has called for harm reduction-oriented treatment programs, especially within hospital settings. We examined the feasibility of a pilot CRA program, "Exploring My Substance Use" (EMSU), that integrates a harm-reduction perspective with structured recreation therapy at a specialty HIV hospital in Toronto, Canada. METHODS: The 12-week EMSU program was delivered alongside a feasibility study that ran for 24 weeks (including an additional 12 weeks after program completion). We recruited hospital in/outpatients with moderate to severe substance use disorder to participate in the program and study. The EMSU program combined weekly substance use groups with weekly recreation therapy sessions. We collected data at five timepoints throughout the study; this article focuses on qualitative data from the final (24-week) interviews, which examine participants' experiences of the program-an under-researched element in CRA literature. We conducted thematic analysis in NVivo12 and descriptive statistics in SPSSv28. RESULTS: Of the n = 12 participants enrolled in the EMSU program, six completed the 12-week intervention. All participants completed the 24-week study interview. The average age of participants was 41.5 years; eight identified as cis-male; most identified as white, experienced food insecurity, and were unstably housed. All participants valued the program, including opportunities to learn new skills and examine function(s) of their substance use, and would enroll if it were offered again. Participants discussed the benefits of leisure activities introduced through recreation therapy, which fostered social connections and provided inspiration/confidence to try new activities. Participants cited a lack of support for those experiencing health/personal challenges and overly strict program attendance rules. To improve the program, participants suggested more tactile activities and incorporating incentives. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the feasibility of a CRA-based program with an integrated harm reduction and a recreation therapy component within an outpatient setting. Future programs should consider building in more flexibility and increased supports for clients dealing with complexities as well as consider COVID-19 related contingencies.

Illicit drug use and harms, and related interventions and policy in Canada: A narrative review of select key indicators and developments since 2000.

BACKGROUND: By the year 2000, Canada faced high levels of illicit drug use and related harms. Simultaneously, a fundamental tension had raisen between continuing a mainly repression-based versus shifting to a more health-oriented drug policy approach. Despite a wealth of new data and numerous individual studies that have emerged since then, no comprehensive review of key indicators and developments of illicit drug use/harm epidemiology, interventions and law/policy exist; this paper seeks to fill this gap. METHODS: We searched and reviewed journal publications, as well as key reports, government publications, surveys, etc. reporting on data and information since 2000. Relevant data were selected and extracted for review inclusion, and subsequently grouped and narratively summarized in major topical sub-theme categories. RESULTS: Cannabis use has remained the principal form of illicit drug use; prescription opioid misuse has arisen as a new and extensive phenomenon. While new drug-related blood-borne-virus transmissions declined, overdose deaths increased in recent years. Acceptance and proliferation of - mainly local/community-based - health measures (e.g., needle exchange, crack paraphernalia or naloxone distribution) aiming at high-risk drug users has evolved, though reach and access limitations have persisted; Vancouver's 'supervised injection site' has attracted continued attention yet remains un-replicated elsewhere in Canada. While opioid maintenance treatment utilization increased, access to treatment for key (e.g., infectious disease, psychiatric) co-morbidities among drug users remained limited. Law enforcement continued to principally focus on cannabis and specifically cannabis users. 'Drug treatment courts' were introduced but have shown limited effectiveness; several attempts cannabis control law reform have failed, except for the recent establishment of 'medical cannabis' access provisions. CONCLUSIONS: While recent federal governments introduced several law and policy measures reinforcing a repression approach to illicit drug use, lower-level jurisdictions (e.g., provincial/municipal levels) and non-governmental organizations increasingly promoted social- and health-oriented intervention frameworks and interventions, therefore creating an increasingly bifurcated - and inherently contradictory - drug policy landscape and reality in Canada.