Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJU Int ; 122(4): 713-715, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630765

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe our buried penis repair technique that includes penile release, tissue resection, wound closure, and penile reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 73 patients were treated from 2007 to 2017. Patients can be categorised into five stages: Stage I, involves only a phimotic band; Stage 2, required excision of diseased penile skin with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG); Stage 3, requires scrotal excision; Stage 4, requires escutcheonectomy; and Stage 5, requires panniculectomy. Successful treatment hinges on adequate excision of diseased skin and de-bulking followed by replacement of deficient skin with STSG. RESULTS: In all, 36 of 73 (49%) patients had Stage 1-3 disease, whilst 37 of 73 (51%) were Stage 4-5. There were complications within the first 30 days in 44 of 73 (60%) patients. In all, 62 of 73 (85%) patients either had no complications or Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications and nine (12%) had complications beyond 30 days. Only five of 36 (14%) patients with Stage 1-3 disease had complications. One patient developed recurrent phimosis. CONCLUSION: The buried penis is a challenging surgical entity where conservative treatment will most likely lead to failure. Surgery is the only means for a lasting cure in these patients and should be used as a first-line treatment. One should expect complications postoperatively, especially within the first 30 days; however, these are mostly limited to Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications.


Assuntos
Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Doenças do Pênis/cirurgia , Pênis/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças do Pênis/etiologia , Escroto/cirurgia , Transplante de Pele , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Anat ; 31(2): 187-190, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29178533

RESUMO

Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty (RFFP) is the current standard of care for most FTM gender confirmation surgeries. This procedure is associated with a rate of urethral stricture as high as 51%, which falls only to 23-35% even among the most experienced contemporary surgeons. While some modifications have been proposed to combat this high complication rate, it still remains a major source of lasting morbidity. The method involves literature review of RFFP literature. Lowest stricture rates are found when neourethra is made with a long, meticulously constructed tube of well-vascularized perivaginal/periurethral and labia minora tissue. In cases of urethral stricture, urethroplasty is required in 94-96% of patients. Surgery should be delayed until all acute inflammation has subsided. Urethroplasty is technically challenging and fails in up to 50% of cases. Repeated surgery or salvage urethral exteriorization procedures, which can leave the patient with lifelong perineal urethrostomy, are often required. Patient and physician knowledge regarding the high burden and poor treatment options for urethral stricture after phalloplasty is incomplete, and patient acceptance of this reality is crucial for honest understanding of the potential complications of this increasingly common but extremely complex surgery. Clin. Anat. 31:187-190, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Pênis/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/efeitos adversos , Doenças Uretrais/etiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologia , Fístula Urinária/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/métodos , Sítio Doador de Transplante , Falha de Tratamento , Doenças Uretrais/prevenção & controle , Doenças Uretrais/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/prevenção & controle , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Fístula Urinária/prevenção & controle , Fístula Urinária/cirurgia , Micção
4.
Nat Rev Urol ; 7(7): 386-91, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20531384

RESUMO

The management of patients with urethral stricture can be a complex process. However, with the appropriate tools, the urologist experienced in urethral surgery can manage most cases without too much difficulty. Here, we describe three surgical techniques--anastomotic urethroplasty, buccal mucosal graft-onlay urethroplasty and the two-staged Johanson urethroplasty--that, in our experience, can accommodate the majority of patients with urethral stricture and provide excellent long-term results. Diagnosis and evaluation of candidacy for each of the surgical techniques are important aspects of treatment planning, and are also described. The aim of the article is to increase the awareness of the technique and application of these three urethroplasty procedures, which can be implemented by all urologists who actively care for and surgically treat patients with urethral stricture disease.


Assuntos
Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretra/patologia , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA