Oral Anticoagulants in the Oldest Old with Recent Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) after recent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ≥85 years. METHODS: Individual patient data analysis from seven prospective stroke cohorts. We compared DOAC versus VKA treatment among patients with AF and recent stroke (<3 months) aged ≥85 versus <85 years. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause death. We used simple, adjusted, and weighted Cox regression to account for confounders. We calculated the net benefit of DOAC versus VKA by balancing stroke reduction against the weighted ICH risk. RESULTS: In total, 5,984 of 6,267 (95.5%) patients were eligible for analysis. Of those, 1,380 (23%) were aged ≥85 years and 3,688 (62%) received a DOAC. During 6,874 patient-years follow-up, the impact of anticoagulant type (DOAC versus VKA) on the hazard for the composite outcome did not differ between patients aged ≥85 (HR≥85y  = 0.65, 95%-CI [0.52, 0.81]) and < 85 years (HR<85y  = 0.79, 95%-CI [0.66, 0.95]) in simple (pinteraction  = 0.129), adjusted (pinteraction  = 0.094) or weighted (pinteraction  = 0.512) models. Analyses on recurrent stroke, ICH and death separately were consistent with the primary analysis, as were sensitivity analyses using age dichotomized at 90 years and as a continuous variable. DOAC had a similar net clinical benefit in patients aged ≥85 (+1.73 to +2.66) and < 85 years (+1.90 to +3.36 events/100 patient-years for ICH-weights 1.5 to 3.1). INTERPRETATION: The favorable profile of DOAC over VKA in patients with AF and recent stroke was maintained in the oldest old. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:78-88.

Improvement of Functional Outcomes in Patients with Stroke who Received Alteplase for Over 15 Years: Japan Stroke Data Bank.

AIM: The nationwide verification of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was rarely performed after the extension of the therapeutic time window of alteplase or after the expansion of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to examine the long-term change in accurate real-world outcomes of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using the Japan Stroke Databank, a representative Japan-wide stroke database. METHODS: We extracted all patients with AIS who received IVT with alteplase between October 11, 2005, the approval date for alteplase use for AIS in Japan, and December 31, 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups using two critical dates in Japan as cutoffs: the official extension date of the therapeutic time window for IVT to within 4.5 h of symptom onset and the publication date of the revised guideline, where the evidence level of MT was heightened. We assessed the yearly trend of IVT implementation rates and the secular changes and three-group changes in clinical outcomes at discharge. RESULTS: Of 124,382 patients with AIS, 9,569 (7.7%) received IVT (females, 41%; median age, 75 years). The IVT implementation rate has generally increased over time and plateaued in recent years. The proportion of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) increased yearly over 15 years. The results of the changes in the outcomes of the three groups were similar to those of the annual changes. CONCLUSIONS: We revealed that IVT implementation rates in patients with AIS increased, and the functional outcome in these patients improved over 15 years. Therefore, the Japanese IVT dissemination strategy is considered appropriate and effective.

Intravenous Thrombolysis With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Background We elucidated the safety of treatment with alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg within 24 hours for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before ischemic stroke onset. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg from 2011 to 2021 were enrolled from our single-center prospective stroke registry. We compared outcomes between patients taking DOACs and those not taking oral anticoagulants within 48 hours of stroke onset. The primary safety outcome was the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage with a ≥4-point increase on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score from baseline. The efficacy outcome was defined as 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 after stroke onset. Of 915 patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis (358 women; median age, 76 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10), 40 patients took DOACs (6 took dabigatran, 8 took rivaroxaban, 16 took apixaban, and 10 took edoxaban) within 24 hours of onset and 753 patients did not take any oral anticoagulants. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was comparable between patients on DOACs and those not on oral anticoagulants (2.5% versus 2.4%, P=0.95). The rate of favorable outcomes was comparable between the 2 groups (59.4% versus 58.2%, P=0.46), although the admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was higher in patients on DOACs. No significant differences showed in any intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours or mortality at 3 months. Conclusions Intravenous thrombolysis would be safely performed for patients on DOACs following the recommendations of the Japanese guidelines. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02251665.

Impact of Renal Impairment on Intensive Blood-Pressure-Lowering Therapy and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Results From ATACH-2.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The clinical effect of renal impairment on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. This study sought to assess whether estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) affects clinical outcomes or modifies the efficacy of intensive systolic blood pressure (BP) control (target, 110-139 mm Hg) against the standard (target, 140-179 mm Hg) among patients with ICH. METHODS: We conducted post hoc analyses of ATACH-2, a randomized, 2-group, open-label trial. The baseline eGFR of each eligible patient was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. The outcome of interest was death or disability at 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Among the 1,000 patients randomized, 974 were analyzed. The median baseline eGFR was 88 (interquartile range, 68, 99) mL/min/1.73 m2; 451 (46.3%), 363 (37.3%), and 160 (16.4%) patients had baseline eGFR values of ≥90, 60-89, and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Compared with normal eGFR (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), higher odds of death or disability were noted among those with eGFR values of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.26) but not among those with eGFR values of 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.46). The odds of death or disability were significantly higher in the intensive arm among patients with decreased eGFR; the ORs were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55-1.44), 1.13 (0.68-1.89), and 3.60 (1.47-8.80) in patients with eGFR values of ≥90, 60-89, and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p for interaction = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Decreased eGFR is associated with unfavorable outcomes following ICH. The statistically significant interaction between the eGFR group and treatment assignment raised safety concerns for the intensive BP-lowering therapy among patients with renal impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01176565. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in spontaneous ICH, decreased eGFR identifies patients at risk of death or disability following intensive BP control.

[MRI and intravenous thrombolysis for unclear-onset stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case report].

During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, an 81-year-old afebrile woman was transported to our institute at 44 minutes after she was found to have global aphasia and weakness of the right extremities. The onset time was unclear. CT showed an occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery without early ischemic changes. MRI revealed a negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pattern, in which several small acute infarcts were seen in diffusion-weighted images with no corresponding hyperintensity lesions on FLAIR. Accordingly, intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (0.6 mg/kg, the dose approved in Japan) was administered at 1,660 minutes after the last known well and 116 minutes after the symptom recognition. An immediate internal carotid angiogram showed severe stenosis at the distal end of the horizontal portion of the left middle cerebral artery. In the follow-up angiogram at 164 minutes after the symptom recognition, the stenotic lesion almost resolved with the restoration of quick and nearly complete antegrade flow. Her symptoms also resolved promptly. Although the use of MRI is recommended to be minimized in the emergency stroke management during the COVID-19 pandemic, MRI is occasionally mandatory for patient selection, such as cases with unclear onset to perform intravenous thrombolysis. The individualized protected code stroke is essential and must be well considered by each institute for diagnosing patients by selecting appropriate modalities.