Effectiveness of a multiple intervention programme for the prevention of falls in older adults persons from a University of the Third Age / Efetividade de uma intervenção múltipla para a prevenção de quedas em idosos participantes de uma Universidade Aberta à Terceira Idade

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multiple intervention programme for the prevention of falls in older adults from a University of the Third Age (U3A). METHOD: A quasi-experimental, non-controlled, longitudinal and quantitative study was performed. 69 older adults were allocated into three groups: Control (CG), Physical Exercise (PEG) and Multiple Intervention (MIG). The instruments/tests used were: sociodemographic questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Scale (15-items), Mini-Mental State Examination, Timed-Up and Go (TUG), Sit-to-Stand and Hand-Grip Strength, Falls Efficacy Scale-International and Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ).The PEG and MIG groups underwent physical training (walking, muscular resistance, and balance) for 16 weeks (2x/week, 60 min/session). In the same period, the MIG also participated in educational sessions (1x/week, 60min/session). Covariance analysis was used for group comparisons. The effect size of the interventions was also calculated. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: 51 older adults (67±6.2 years and 76.3% women), of whom 15 were in the CG, 20 in the PEG and 16 in the MIG, concluded the study. TUG time in both intervention groups was reduced, but FRAQ score improved in the MIG only. Both interventions had a small effect on TUG time, while multiple intervention had a large effect on FRAQ. CONCLUSION: Multiple intervention brought additional benefits to the older adults from this U3A. In addition to improving balance, the older adults who underwent the multiple intervention increased their knowledge about risk factors for falls.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a efetividade de uma intervenção múltipla para a prevenção de quedas em idosos participantes de uma Universidade Aberta à Terceira Idade (UnATI). MÉTODO: Estudo quase experimental, não controlado, de caráter longitudinal e quantitativo. Foram alocados 69 idosos em três grupos: Controle (GC), Exercício Físico (GEF) e Intervenção Múltipla (GIM). Os instrumentos/testes utilizados foram: questionário sociodemográfico, Escala de Depressão Geriátrica (15-itens), Miniexame do Estado Mental, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Levantar e Sentar da Cadeira e Força de Preensão Palmar, Falls Efficacy Scale-International e Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ). Os grupos GEF e GIM foram submetidos ao treinamento físico (caminhada, resistência muscular e equilíbrio) por 16 semanas (duas vezes por semana, 60 min/sessão). No mesmo período, o GIM participou também de sessões educativas (uma vez por semana, 60min/sessão). Na comparação dos grupos, utilizou-se a análise de covariância. O tamanho do efeito das intervenções também foi calculado. O nível de significância estabelecido foi de p<0,05. RESULTADOS: Cinquenta e um idosos [67 (±6,2) anos; 76,3% mulheres], sendo 15 do GC, 20 do GEF e 16 do GIM concluíram o estudo. Ambos os grupos intervenção reduziram o tempo do TUG, mas somente o GIM melhorou a pontuação da FRAQ. Ambas as intervenções tiveram efeito pequeno no tempo do TUG, enquanto a intervenção múltipla apresentou efeito grande na FRAQ. CONCLUSÃO: A intervenção múltipla trouxe benefício adicional aos idosos dessa UnATI. Além da melhora no equilíbrio, os idosos submetidos à intervenção múltipla aumentaram o conhecimento sobre fatores de risco para quedas.

The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in primary care: applicability and psychometric characteristics of the original and short form

Abstract Background Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has negative implications for people’s lives, but is often underdiagnosed in the elderly. There is a shortage of instruments to assess geriatric anxiety. Objectives To analyze the applicability and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and its short form (GAI-SF) within primary care. Methods Fifty-five seniors were classified as non-demented by a multidisciplinary panel. The protocol included the GAI, the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), the Depression Scale D-10, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Bayer Scale for Activities of Daily Living (B-ADL) and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). A sub-sample also completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Results The GAI and GAI-SF showed good internal consistency (0.89; 0.62, respectively) and test-retest stability (0.58, 0.97). The GAI and GAI-SF correlated significantly with the SRQ-20 (0.74, 0.55) and BAI (0.75, 0.58). Discussion The psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian versions of the GAI and GAI-SF suggest these instruments are suitable for application in the Brazilian elderly population within the primary care setting.