What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2016. Part 1: treatment and prevention.

This review is part of a series of annual updates summarizing the evidence base for atopic eczema (AE). It provides a summary of key findings from 28 systematic reviews that were published or indexed during 2016 with a focus on treatment and prevention of AE. There is reasonable evidence of benefit for topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, a glycyrrhetinic acid-containing preparation (Atopiclair® ), oral ciclosporin, oral azathioprine, narrowband ultraviolet B radiation and education programmes. Overall, there is evidence that topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have similar efficacy and that both can prevent AE flares when used twice weekly as maintenance therapy. However, topical calcineurin inhibitors are costlier and have more adverse reactions, thus topical corticosteroids should remain the standard of care for patients with AE. There is no evidence that multiple applications are better than once-daily application of topical corticosteroid. There is inconsistent evidence to support omalizumab and specific allergen immunotherapy use in AE. There is some evidence that vitamin D supplementation and synbiotics reduce AE severity, although the margin of improvement may not be clinically meaningful. There is little evidence to support the use of wet wraps or of complementary/alternative medicine (including Chinese herbal medicine). There is some evidence to suggest that a diet high in fish in infancy may be preventative for AE, but other dietary interventions for the prevention of AE show little promise. This review provides a succinct guide for clinicians and patients wishing to remain up to date with the latest evidence for the treatment and prevention of AE.

Oral propranolol in the treatment of proliferating infantile haemangiomas: British Society for Paediatric Dermatology consensus guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Infantile haemangiomas (IH) are the most common vascular tumours of infancy. Despite their frequency and potential complications, there are currently no unified U.K. guidelines for the treatment of IH with propranolol. There are still uncertainties and diverse opinions regarding indications, pretreatment investigations, its use in PHACES (posterior fossa malformations-haemangiomas-arterial anomalies-cardiac defects-eye abnormalities-sternal cleft and supraumbilical raphe) syndrome and cessation of treatment. OBJECTIVES: To provide unified guidelines for the treatment of IH with propranolol. METHODS: This study used a modified Delphi technique, which involved an international treatment survey, a systematic evidence review of the literature, a face-to-face multidisciplinary panel meeting and anonymous voting. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus on 47 statements in eight categories, including indications and contraindications for starting propranolol, pretreatment investigations, starting and target dose, monitoring of adverse effects, the use of propranolol in PHACES syndrome and how to stop treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus guidelines will help to standardize and simplify the treatment of IH with oral propranolol across the U.K. and assist in clinical decision-making.

Propranolol and prednisolone combination for the treatment of segmental haemangioma in PHACES syndrome.

Posterior fossa malformations-haemangiomas-arterial anomalies-cardiac defects-eye abnormalities-sternal cleft and supraumbilical raphe syndrome (also known as PHACES syndrome) is a rare neurocutaneous disorder. Children presenting with these manifestations need careful ophthalmological, cardiac and neurological assessment. They may have one or more of these extracutaneous manifestations, the most common being cerebral and cardiovascular anomalies. There is controversy about treating these children with propranolol especially if they have cerebrovascular involvement with narrow, dysplastic or absent blood vessels. The concern with propranolol is that hypotension may lead to reduced cerebral blood flow and neurological consequences. Prior to propranolol the systemic treatment for haemangiomas was prednisolone and then the concern was the opposite, namely hypertension. Our proposal was whether a combination of these two drugs would provide a safer and faster recovery. We report three retrospective cases of PHACES syndrome, each of whom received treatment with a combination of propranolol and prednisolone: two children were started on prednisolone and propranolol was added because the haemangiomas failed to respond adequately; the third child was started on propranolol and developed peripheral ischaemia and ulceration necessitating a reduction in dose addition of a low dose of prednisolone. All three patients, who failed on the one treatment, responded well to combination therapy without any significant complications. These outcomes suggest that for some patients with PHACES syndrome the use of combination treatment with propranolol and prednisolone could be advantageous, potentially allowing for the introduction of low doses of each with an enhanced combined effect. The doses can be increased gradually depending on the magnetic resonance imaging findings.