Efficacy of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet 2,940 and 1,064 nm Laser Treatment for Facial Rejuvenation-A Randomized Controlled Split-Face Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The 2,940 nm erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet and 1,064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers have been widely applied in facial rejuvenation, but no randomized trials exist to evaluate the efficacy of the combination treatment. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of the combined treatment for facial rejuvenation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 subjects with facial aging were enrolled and randomly assigned into 2 groups: one side of the face was treated with a 2,940 nm or 1,064 nm laser alone and the other side was treated with the combined lasers. The patients were treated by 3 sessions with 1-month intervals. The efficacies were quantitatively accessed by digitalized high-resolution photographs. RESULTS: The 1,064 nm laser alone showed significant improvements on indexes of skin texture, spore, brown spots, elasticity, and melanin as compared with the baseline (p < .05). The 2,940 nm laser alone showed significant improvements on indexes of wrinkle, texture, pore, and elasticity (p < .05). The combined treatments showed significant improvements on the abovementioned indexes as compared with either a 1,064 nm or 2,940 nm laser treatment (p < .05). CONCLUSION: A combination of 1,064 nm and 2,940 nm laser treatment renders significantly better efficacies for facial rejuvenation as compared with a 2,940 nm or 1,064 nm laser alone.

A randomized, split-face controlled trial on the safety and effects of microneedle fractional radiofrequency and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm laser therapies for baggy lower eyelids.

The non-ablative fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm laser (NAFL) and the microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) procedures are effective treatments that enable periorbital skin rejuvenation. To compare the clinical effectiveness and side effects of MFR and the NAFL for baggy lower eyelids (BLEs) in the Chinese population. Fifteen Chinese subjects with BLEs received three split-face treatments on a monthly basis randomly. Objective and subjective assessments were performed at baseline, as well as 1 month and 3 months after the third treatment. The results were evaluated using Antera-3D and CineScan systems. Blinded investigator assessments were performed by two plastic surgeons using a 0 to 4 score in six anatomic categories of BLEs. The patients also reported their level of satisfaction based on a four-point score. Most of the patients reported a greater than 47% satisfaction rate with both treatments. The cumulative contribution scores of prolapse of orbital fat, hollow tear trough, and skin laxity for each category variable declined with time. Using Antera 3D, the volume of elevation (mm3) decreased from 0.6 ± 0.4 to 0.4 ± 0.3 and from 0.6 ± 0.3 to 0.3 ± 0.3, the elevation area (mm2) decreased from 17.0 ± 8.4 to 13.0 ± 7.1 and from 17.0 ± 7.8 to 10.0 ± 5.6, and the maximum peak height (mm) also decreased from 0.10 ± 0.04 to 0.06 ± 0.04 and from 0.10 ± 0.03 to 0.06 ± 0.02 in the MFR and NAFL groups, respectively. Using CineScan, the depth of middle orbital fat (mm) decreased significantly from 10.2 ± 2.2 to 8.0 ± 0.7 and from 9.8 ± 1.1 to 8.0 ± 0.9 and the length of orbital fat significantly decreased from 9.2 ± 1.2 to 7.7 ± 0.7 and from 9.7 ± 1.4 to 7.8 ± 0.6 in the MFR and NAFL groups, respectively. MFR and NAFL therapies were effective for the treatment of BLEs, especially in BLE patients with skin elasticity in addition to tear trough deformity and orbital fat prolapse. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04237324. TRIAL REGISTER: ClinicalTrials.gov. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Clinical efficacy of different therapeutic modes of CO2 fractional laser for treatment of static periocular wrinkles in Asian skin.

BACKGROUND: Periocular fine lines and wrinkles usually appear as a first visible sign of facial aging. Fractional ablative laser has been used to treat periorbital wrinkles. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy on treatment of static periorbital wrinkles using different emission modes of CO2 fractional laser. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with static periorbital wrinkles were enrolled. The subjects were randomly assigned into two split-face groups: One side was treated with a deep (n = 15) or mid-mode of CO2  superficial laser (n = 15), and the other side of periocular region was treated by a fusion mode in combination of both modes (n = 30). RESULTS: The patients in three groups showed significant improvements on indexes of periocular wrinkles, skin textures, and elasticity at three-month follow-up as compared with baseline (p < 0.05). Fusion mode resulted in a significantly progressive improvement on periocular wrinkles at three-month follow-up as compared with one-month follow-up (p < 0.05), which were not observed in other modes. Fusion mode delivered better improvements of periocular wrinkles and skin textures as compared to deep and mid-modes at three-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Fusion mode also resulted in better scores of global esthetic improvement scale and patient satisfaction as compared to other modes at both follow-ups. CONCLUSION: The fusion mode has a synergistic effect in periorbital static wrinkle treatment, which is worthy of further evaluation and investigation.